Skip to main content
×
×
Home

The importance of salience: public opinion and state policy action on climate change

  • Rebecca Bromley-Trujillo (a1) and John Poe (a2)
Abstract

How does the salience of environmental issues influence climate policy adoption in the American states? This article considers how two aspects of public salience, issue problem status and issue attention, work with environmental interest group membership to influence climate policy adoption in the American states. We contribute to the theoretical development of issue salience and offer alternative measures that capture differences in salience across subnational units. We find evidence that states where climate change is perceived to be a problem, and where attention to environmental issues is high, are more likely to adopt relevant policies. Furthermore, states with Republican majorities in either legislative chamber are less likely to adopt climate policies. Our findings have implications for the impact of salience on the policy process.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author. Email: rebecca.bromleytrujillo@cnu.edu
References
Hide All
Abelson, RP (1988) Conviction. American Psychologist 43, 267275.
Abramowitz, AI (1995) It’s Abortion, Stupid: Policy Voting in the 1992 Presidential Election. Journal of Politics 57, 176186.
Aldrich, JH, Sullivan, JLBorgida, E (1989) Foreign Affairs and Issue Voting: Do Presidential Candidates “Waltz Before a Blind Audience?”. The American Political Science Review 83, 123141.
Allison, PDWaterman, RP (2002) Fixed-Effects Negative Binomial Regression Models. Sociological Methodology 32, 247265.
Arceneaux, K (2002) Direct Democracy and the Link between Public Opinion and State Abortion Policy. State Politics and Policy Quarterly 2, 372388.
Bennett, L (2011) News: The Politics of Illusion. White Plains, NY: Longman.
Berry, FS (1994) Sizing up State Policy Innovation Research. Policy Studies Journal 22, 442456.
Berry, FSBerry, WD (1992) Tax Innovation in the States: Capitalizing on Political Opportunity. American Journal of Political Science 36, 715742.
Berry, WD, Ringquist, EJ, Fording, RCHanson, RL (1998) Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the American States, 1960–93. American Journal of Political Science 42, 327348.
Berry, WD, Ringquist, EJ, Fording, RC, Hanson, RLKlarner, C (2010) Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the American States: A Re-appraisal. State Politics and Policy Quarterly 10, 117135.
Bishin, B (2009) Tyranny of the Minority: The Subconstituency Politics Theory of Representation. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
Bizer, GY, Visser, PS, Berent, MKKrosnick, JA (2004) Importance, Knowledge, and Accessibility: Exploring the Dimensionality of Strength-Related Attitude Properties. In Saris WE and Sniderman PM (eds.), Studies in Public Opinion: Gauging Attitudes, Nonattitudes, Measurement Error and Change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Boden, TA, Marland, GAndres, RJ (2017) National CO2 Emissions from Fossil-Fuel Burning, Cement Manufacture, and Gas Flaring: 1751-2014, Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy, doi: 10.3334/CDIAC/00001_V2017.
Bohner, GDickel, N (2011) Attitudes and Attitude Change. Annual Review of Psychology 62, 391417.
Boninger, DS, Krosnick, JA, Berent, MKFabrigar, LR (1995) The Causes and Consequences of Attitude Importance. Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences 4, 159189.
Bostrom, A, Morgan, G, Fischhoff, BRead, D (1994) What Do People Know about Global Climate Change? 1. Mental models. Risk Analysis 14, 959970.
Brace, P, Sims-Butler, K, Arceneaux, KJohnson, M (2002) Public Opinion in the American States: New Perspectives Using National Survey Data. American Journal of Political Science 46, 173189.
Bromley-Trujillo, R, Poe, J, Butler, JSDavis, W (2016) The Spreading of Innovation: State Adoptions of Energy and Climate Change Policy. Review of Policy Research 33, 544565. doi: 10.1111/ropr.12189.
Burden, BCSanberg, JNR (2003) Budget Rhetoric in Presidential Campaigns from 1952 to 2000. Political Behavior 25, 97118.
Burstein, P (2003) The Impact of Public Opinion on Policy: A Review of an Agenda. Political Research Quarterly 56, 2940.
Capstick, S, Whitmarsh, L, Poortinga, W, Pidgeon, NUpham, P (2015) International Trends in Public Perceptions of Climate Change over the Past Quarter Century. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 6, 3561.
Carley, S (2011) The Era of State Energy Policy Innovation: A Review of Policy Instruments. Review of Policy Research 28, 265294.
Carley, SMiller, CJ (2012) Regulatory Stringency and Policy Drivers: A Reassessment of Renewable Portfolio Standards. Policy Studies Journal 40, 730756.
Carpini, MXD, Keeter, SKennamer, JD (1994) Effects of the News Media Environment on Citizen Knowledge of State Politics and Government. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 71, 443456.
Chandler, J (2009) Trendy Solutions: Why Do States Adopt Sustainable Energy Portfolio Standards? Energy Policy 37, 32743281.
Dahl, RA (1956) A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Daley, DGarand, JC (2005) Horizontal Diffusion, Vertical Diffusion, and Internal Pressure in State Environmental Policymaking, 1989-1998. American Politics Research 33, 615644.
Davenport, CLipton, E (2017) How G.O.P. Leaders Came to View Climate Change as Fake Science. New York Times, http://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/03/us/politics/republican-leaders-climate-change.html.
Demski, C, Capstick, S, Pidgeon, N, Sosato, RGSpence, A (2017) Experience of Extreme Weather Affects Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation Responses. Climatic Change 140, 149164.
Dorroh, J (2009) Statehouse Exodus. American Journalism Review 31, 2036.
Dunlap, REMcCright, A (2011) Organized Climate Change Denial. In: Schlosberg D, Dryzek J and Norgaard, R. (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Climate Change and Society. Oxford University Press, Cambridge, 1, pp. 144160.
Dunlap, RE, Xiao, CMcCright, A (2001) Politics and Environment in America: Partisan and Ideological Cleavages in Public Support for Environmentalism. Environmental Politics 10, 2348.
Enda, J, Matsa, KEBoyles, JL (2014) America’s Shifting Statehouse Press. Pew Research Center’s Journalism Project. http://www.journalism.org/2014/07/10/americas-shifting-statehouse-press/ (accessed 12 February 2017).
Epstein, LSegal, JA (2000) Measuring Issue Salience. American Journal of Political Science 44, 6683.
Erikson, RS, Wright, GCMcIver, JP (1993) Statehouse Democracy: Public Opinion and Policy in the American States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Greenblatt, A (2010) How Republicans Learned to Reject Climate Change. National Public Radio, https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=125075282. (accessed 15 October 2018).
Green, W (2004) The Behaviour of the Maximum Likelihood Estimator of Limited Dependent Variable Models in the Presence of Fixed Effects. The Econometrics Journal 7, 98119.
Haider-Markel, DPMeier, KJ (2003) Legislative Victory, Electoral Uncertainty: Explaining Outcomes in the Battles over Lesbian and Civil Rights. Review of Policy Research 20, 671690.
Hays, SP, Esler, MHays, CE (1996) Environmental Commitment Among the States: Integrating Alternative Approaches to State Environmental Policy. Publius 26, 4158.
Hilbe, JM (2011) Negative Binomial Regression. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Huang, M-Y, Alavalapati, JRR, Carter, DRLangholtz, MH (2007) Is the Choice of Renewable Portfolio Standards Random? Energy Policy 35, 55715575.
Johnson, M, Brace, PArceneaux, K (2005) Public Opinion and Dynamic Representation in the American States: The Case of Environmental Attitudes. Social Science Quarterly 86, 87108.
Karch, A (2007) Emerging Issues and Future Directions in State Policy Diffusion Research. State Politics & Policy Quarterly 7, 5480.
Kelemen, D (2010) Globalizing European Union Environmental Policy. Journal of European Public Policy 17, 335349.
Kim, SYWolinsky-Nahmias, Y (2014) Cross-National Public Opinion on Climate Change: The Effects of Affluence and Vulnerability. Global Environmental Politics 13, 79106.
Klarner, C (2003) The Measurement of the Partisan Balance of State Government. State Politics & Policy Quarterly 3, 309319.
Konisky, DM, Hughes, LKaylor, CH (2016) Extreme Weather Events and Climate Change Concern. Climatic Change 134, 533547.
Krosnick, J Opinions in the States. Available from http://climatepublicopinion.stanford.edu/sample-page/opinions-in-the-states/ (accessed 21 July 2017).
Lax, JRPhillips, JH (2009) How Should We Estimate Opinion in the States? American Journal of Political Science 53, 107121.
Lax, JRPhillips, JH (2012) The Democratic Deficit in the States. American Journal of Political Science 56, 148166.
Leiserowitz, A (2006) Climate Change Risk Perception and Policy Preferences: The Role of Affect, Imagery, and Values. Climate Change 77, 4272.
Lyon, TPYin, H (2010) Why do States Adopt Renewable Portfolio Standards? An Empirical Investigation. Energy Journal 31, 131156.
Maibach, E, Roser-Renouf, CLeiserowitz, A (2009) Global Warming’s Six Americas 2009: An Audience Segmentation Analysis. New Haven, CT: Yale Project on Climate Change.
Matisoff, DC (2008) The Adoption of State Climate Change Policies and Renewable Portfolio Standards: Regional Diffusion or Internal Determinants? Review of Policy Research 25, 527546.
Matisoff, DCEdwards, J (2014) Kindred Spirits or Intergovernmental Competition? The Innovation and Diffusion of Energy Policies in the American States (1990–2008). Environmental Politics 23, 795817.
McCarthy, T (2014) Meet the Republicans in Congress who Don’t Believe Climate Change is Real. The Guardian, http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/nov/17/climate-change-denial-scepticism-republicans-congress.
Monroe, AD (1998) Public Opinion and Policy, 1980–1993. Public Opinion Quarterly 62, 628.
Mooney, CZLee, M-H (1995) Legislative Morality in the American States: The Case of Pre‐Roe Abortion Regulation Reform. American Journal of Political Science 39, 599627.
Neundorf, AAdams, J (2016) The Micro-Foundations of Party Competition and Issue Ownership: The Reciprocal Effects of Citizens’ Issue Salience and Party Attachments. British Journal of Political Science 122. doi: 10.1017/S0007123415000642.
Oehl, B, Schaffer, LMBernauer, T (2017) How to Measure Public Demand for Policies When There is no Appropriate Survey Data? Journal of Public Policy 37, 173204.
Ostrom, E (2010) Polycentric Systems for Coping with Collective Action and Global Environmental Change. Global Environmental Change 20, 550557.
Owen, AL, Conover, E, Videras, JWu, S (2012) Heat Waves, Droughts, and Preferences for Environmental Policy. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 31, 556577.
Page, BIShapiro, RY (1983) The Effects of Public Opinion on Policy. American Political Science Review 77, 175190.
Rabe, BG (2010) Greenhouse Governance: Addressing Climate Change in America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Reilly, S, Richey, STaylor, JB (2012) Using Google Search Data for State Politics Research: An Empirical Validity Test Using Roll-off Data. States Politics and Policy Quarterly 12, 146159.
Reynolds, TW, Bostrom, A, Read, DMorgan, MG (2010) Now What Do People Know About Global Climate Change? Survey Studies of Educated Laypeople. Risk Analysis 30, 15201538.
Ringquist, EGarand, JC (1999) Policy Change in the American States. In Weber Ronald E and Brace Paul (eds.), American State and Local Politics. New York: Chatham House Publishing, 268299.
Rogers, S (2015) Voter Knowledge of State Legislatures. Paper presented at the Midwest Political Science Association Annual Conference, Chicago IL.
Schreurs, MATiberghien, Y (2007) Multi-Level Reinforcement: Explaining European Union Leadership in Climate Change Mitigation. Global Environmental Politics 7, 1946.
Smith, TW (1985) The Polls: America’s Most Important Problems Part I: National and International. Public Opinion Quarterly 49, 264274.
Squire, P (2007) Measuring State Legislative Professionalism: The Squire Index Revisited. State Politics and Policy Quarterly 7, 211227.
Stimson, JA, MacKuen, MBErikson, RS (1995) Dynamic Representation. American Political Science Review 89, 543565.
Stoutenborough, JWBeverlin, M (2008) Promoting Pollution-Free Energy: The Diffusion of State Net Metering Policies. Social Science Quarterly 89, 12301251.
UNFCCC. Paris Agreement- Status of Ratification. https://unfccc.int/process/the-paris-agreement/status-of-ratification. (accessed 15 October 2018).
U.S. Climate Policy Maps (2013) Center for Climate and Energy Solutions. http://www.c2es.org/us-states-regions/policy-maps.
Walker, JL (1969) The Diffusion of Innovations Among the American States. American Political Science Review 63, 880899.
Wheeler, SM (2008) State and Municipal Climate Change Plans: The First Generation. Journal of the American Planning Association 74, 481496.
Wlezien, C (2005) On the Salience of Political Issues: The Problem with ‘Most Important Problem. Electoral Studies 24, 555579.
Yeager, DS, Larson, SB, Krosnick, JA, Tompson, T (2011) Measuring Americans' Issue Priorities: A New Version of the Most Important Problem Question Reveals More Concern about Global Warming and the Environment. Public Opinion Quarterly 75, 125138.
Zahran, S, Brody, SD, Grover, HVedlitz, A (2006) Climate Change Vulnerability and Policy Support. Society & Natural Resources 19, 771789.
Zaller, J (1992) Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Zaller, JFeldman, S (1992) A Simple Theory of the Survey Response: Answering Questions Versus Revealing Preferences. American Journal of Political Science 36, 579616.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Public Policy
  • ISSN: 0143-814X
  • EISSN: 1469-7815
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-public-policy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Type Description Title
UNKNOWN
Supplementary materials

Bromley-Trujillo and Poe Dataset
Dataset

 Unknown
WORD
Supplementary materials

Bromley-Trujillo and Poe supplementary material
Bromley-Trujillo and Poe supplementary material 1

 Word (1.7 MB)
1.7 MB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed