Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Instruments of Government: Perceptions and Contexts

  • Stephen H. Linder (a1) and B. Guy Peters (a2)
Abstract
ABSTRACT

Government uses a wide variety of instruments to reach its policy goals, ranging from indirect methods, such as moral suasion and cash inducements, to more direct ones involving government provision of services. Although there has been a fair amount of writing on the nature and use of various policy instruments, there is very little work on either the meaning ascribed to these instruments by the decisionmakers who use them (or the experts who design them) or the processes by which some come to be favored over others. Characteristics of the political system, such as national policy style, the organizational setting of the decisionmaker, and the problem situation are all likely to have some influence over the choice of instruments. The relative impact of these variables, however, is likely to be mediated by subjective factors linked to cognition. Perceptions of the proper ‘tool to do the job’ intervenes between context and choice in a complex way. Efforts to account for variation in instrument choice, then, must focus not only on macro level variables but on micro ones as well.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Atkinson M. and Chandler M., eds. (1983). The Politics of Canadian Public Policy. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Berger P. and Luckmann T. (1966). The Social Construction of Reality. Garden City, NJ: Doubleday.
Bobrow D. and Dryzek J. (1987). Policy Analysis By Design. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Braybrooke D. and Lindblom C. (1963). A Strategy of Decision. New York, NY: Free Press.
Campbell J. (1989). Afterward on Policy Communities: A Framework for Comparative Research. Governance 2: 8694.
Cohen M., March J. and Olsen J. (1972). A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice. Administrative Science Quarterly 17: 125.
Dahl R. and Lindblom C. (1953). Politics, Economics and Welfare. New York: Harper and Row.
Diver C. (1983). The Optimal Precision of Administrative Rules. The Yale Law Journal 93: 65109.
Doern G. B. and Phidd R. (1983). Canadian Public Policy: Ideas, Structure, Process. Toronto: Methuen.
Doern G. B. and Wilson V. S., eds. (1974). Issues in Canadian Public Policy. Toronto: Macmillan.
Downs A. (1967). Inside Bureaucracy. Boston: Little, Brown.
Dunn W. (1982). Policy Analysis: An Introduction. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Dunn W. (1986). Policy Analysis: Perspectives, Concepts and Methods. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Dunn W. and Holzner B. (1988). Knowledge in Society: Anatomy of an Emergent Field. Knowledge in Society 1: 326.
Elmore R. (1985). Forward and Backward Mapping: Reversible Logic in the Analysis of Public Policy. In Policy Implementation in Federal and Unitary Systems, Hanf K. and Toonen T., eds. Dodrecht, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
Gormley W. (1986). Muscles and Prayers: Coercive and Catalytic Controls over Public Policy, Paper presented at Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C.
Greenberg G. D. et al. (1977). Developing Public Policy Theory: Perspectives from Empirical Research. American Political Science Review 71: 1532–43.
Hood C. (1984). The Tools of Government. London: Macmillan.
Hood C., Dunsire A. and Thompson S. (1988). Thatcherism, Fraserism and the Bureaucracy, Governance 1: 243270.
Hoppe R., van de Graaf H. and van Dijk A. (1987). Implementation Research and Policy Design. International Review of Administrative Sciences 53: 581604.
Ingraham P. (1987). Toward More Systematic Consideration of Policy Design. Policy Studies Journal 15: 611628.
Ingram H. and Schneider A. (1988). Behavioral Approaches to Policy Design, Unpublished Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, Illinois.
Jones C. (1977). An Introduction to the Study of Public Policy. N. Scituate, MA: Duxbury.
Kaufmann F., Majone G. and Ostrom V. (1986). Guidance, Performance and Evaluation in the Public Sector. New York, NY: Walter deGruyter.
Kelman S. (1981). What Price Incentives? Boston: Auburn House.
Kettl D. (1987). Government by Proxy. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.
Kingdon J. (1984). Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policy. Boston: Little, Brown.
Kirschen E. et al. (1964). Economic Policy in Our Times. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Linder S. and Peters B. G. (1984). From Social Theory to Policy Design. Journal of Public Policy 4: 237259.
Lowi T. J. (1972). Four Systems of Policy, Politics and Choice. Public Administration Review 32: 298310.
Lynn L. and Seidl J. (1975). Policy Analysis at HEW. Policy Analysis 1: 232273.
Majone G. (1975) The Feasibility of Social Policies. Policy Sciences 6: 4969.
March J. and Olsen J. (1984). The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life. American Political Science Review 78: 734748.
May P. (1981). Hints for Crafting Alternative Policies. Policy Analysis 7: 227244.
Mayntz R. (1981). The Changing Conditions of Effective Public Policy, University of Bielefeld, ZiF Research Group.
McDonnell K. and Elmore R. (1986). Getting the Job Done: Alternative Policy Instruments. Paper presented at the Annual Research Conference of the Association of Policy Analysis and Management, Austin, Texas.
McKelvey R. (1982). Organizational Systematics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Meltsner A. (1975). Policy Analysts in the Bureaucracy. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Miller T. (1984). Conclusion: A Design Science Perspective. In Miller T., ed., Public Sector Performance. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Mohr L. (1973). The Concept of Organizational Goal, American Political Science Review 67: 470481.
Mosher F. (1980). The Changing Responsibilities and Tactics of the Federal Government. Public Administration Review 40: 541548.
O'Toole L. (1986). Policy Recommendations for Multi-Actor Implementation. Journal of Public Policy 6: 181210.
Peters B. G. (1986). American Public Policy: Promise and Performance. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
Phidd R. and Doern G. B. (1978). The Politics and Management of Canadian Economic Policy. Toronto: Macmillan.
Putnam R. (1982). The Comparative Study of Political Elites. New York: Wiley.
Richardson J. (1982). Policy Styles in Western Europe. London: George Allen & Unwin.
Ripley R. (1966). Public Policies and Their Politics. New York: Norton.
Sabatier P. (1987). Top-Down and Bottom-Up Approaches to Implementation Research. Journal of Public Policy 6: 2148.
Salamon L. (1981). Rethinking Public Management. Public Policy 29: 255275.
Simon H. (1947). Administrative Behavior. New York, NY: Macmillan.
Spitzer R. (1987). Promoting Policy Theory. Policy Studies journal 15: 675689.
Steinberger P. (1980). Typologies of Public Policy: Meaning Construction and the Policy Process. Social Science Quarterly 61: 185197.
Tinbergen J. (1956). Economic Policy: Principles and Design. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company.
Trebilcock M. et al. (1982). The Choice of Governing Instrument. Ottawa: Ministry of Supply and Services.
Torgerson D. (1985). Contextual Orientation in Policy Analysis. Policy Sciences 18: 241261.
Walker J. (1989). Introduction: Policy Communities as Global Phenomena. Governance 2: 14.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Public Policy
  • ISSN: 0143-814X
  • EISSN: 1469-7815
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-public-policy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 81 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 583 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 22nd October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.