Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 93
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Henstra, Daniel 2016. The tools of climate adaptation policy: analysing instruments and instrument selection. Climate Policy, Vol. 16, Issue. 4, p. 496.

    Margetts, Helen and Hood, Christopher 2016. Contemporary Approaches to Public Policy.

    Mukherjee, Ishani and Howlett, Michael 2016. An Asian perspective on policy instruments: policy styles, governance modes and critical capacity challenges. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, Vol. 38, Issue. 1, p. 24.

    Voß, Jan-Peter 2016. Knowing Governance.

    Yeung, Karen 2016. The Forms and Limits of Choice Architecture as a Tool of Government. Law & Policy, Vol. 38, Issue. 3, p. 186.


    Dutil, Patrice 2015. Crowdsourcing as a new instrument in the government's arsenal: Explorations and considerations. Canadian Public Administration, Vol. 58, Issue. 3, p. 363.

    Froestad, Jan Grimwood, Sakina Herbstein, Tom and Shearing, Clifford 2015. Policy Design and Nodal Governance: A Comparative Analysis of Determinants of Environmental Policy Change in a South African City. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, Vol. 17, Issue. 2, p. 174.

    Macintosh, Andrew Foerster, Anita and McDonald, Jan 2015. Policy design, spatial planning and climate change adaptation: a case study from Australia. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Vol. 58, Issue. 8, p. 1432.

    Peters, B. Guy and Pierre, Jon 2015. Governance and policy problems: instruments as unitary and mixed modes of policy intervention. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, Vol. 37, Issue. 4, p. 224.


    Woo, J.J. 2015. Singapore’s policy style: statutory boards as policymaking units. Journal of Asian Public Policy, Vol. 8, Issue. 2, p. 120.

    Woo, J.J. Ramesh, M. and Howlett, M. 2015. Legitimation capacity: System-level resources and political skills in public policy. Policy and Society, Vol. 34, Issue. 3-4, p. 271.

    Benijts, Tim 2014. A Business Sustainability Model for Government Corporations. A Belgian Case Study. Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol. 23, Issue. 3, p. 204.

    Macintosh, Andrew McDonald, Jan and Foerster, Anita 2014. Applied Studies in Climate Adaptation.

    Murphy, Lorraine 2014. The policy instruments of European front-runners: effective for saving energy in existing dwellings?. Energy Efficiency, Vol. 7, Issue. 2, p. 285.

    Siddiki, Saba 2014. Assessing Policy Design and Interpretation: An Institutions-Based Analysis in the Context of Aquaculture in Florida and Virginia, United States. Review of Policy Research, Vol. 31, Issue. 4, p. 281.

    Voß, Jan-Peter and Simons, Arno 2014. Instrument constituencies and the supply side of policy innovation: the social life of emissions trading. Environmental Politics, Vol. 23, Issue. 5, p. 735.

    Fischer, A. Paige Kline, Jeffrey D. Charnley, Susan and Olsen, Christine 2013. Erratum to ‘Identifying policy target groups with qualitative and quantitative methods: the case of wildfire risk on nonindustrial private forest lands’ [Forest Policy and Economics 25 (2012) 62–71]. Forest Policy and Economics, Vol. 28, p. 69.

    Hophmayer-Tokich, Sharon 2013. Water Pollution Control Legislation in Israel: Understanding Implementation Processes from an Actor-Centered Approach. Water, Vol. 5, Issue. 3, p. 1393.


Instruments of Government: Perceptions and Contexts

  • Stephen H. Linder (a1) and B. Guy Peters (a2)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 28 November 2008

Government uses a wide variety of instruments to reach its policy goals, ranging from indirect methods, such as moral suasion and cash inducements, to more direct ones involving government provision of services. Although there has been a fair amount of writing on the nature and use of various policy instruments, there is very little work on either the meaning ascribed to these instruments by the decisionmakers who use them (or the experts who design them) or the processes by which some come to be favored over others. Characteristics of the political system, such as national policy style, the organizational setting of the decisionmaker, and the problem situation are all likely to have some influence over the choice of instruments. The relative impact of these variables, however, is likely to be mediated by subjective factors linked to cognition. Perceptions of the proper ‘tool to do the job’ intervenes between context and choice in a complex way. Efforts to account for variation in instrument choice, then, must focus not only on macro level variables but on micro ones as well.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

J. Campbell (1989). Afterward on Policy Communities: A Framework for Comparative Research. Governance 2: 8694.

M. Cohen , J. March and J. Olsen (1972). A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice. Administrative Science Quarterly 17: 125.

C. Diver (1983). The Optimal Precision of Administrative Rules. The Yale Law Journal 93: 65109.

R. Elmore (1985). Forward and Backward Mapping: Reversible Logic in the Analysis of Public Policy. In Policy Implementation in Federal and Unitary Systems, K. Hanf and T. Toonen , eds. Dodrecht, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.

G. D. Greenberg (1977). Developing Public Policy Theory: Perspectives from Empirical Research. American Political Science Review 71: 1532–43.

C. Hood , A. Dunsire and S. Thompson (1988). Thatcherism, Fraserism and the Bureaucracy, Governance 1: 243270.

R. Hoppe , H. van de Graaf and A. van Dijk (1987). Implementation Research and Policy Design. International Review of Administrative Sciences 53: 581604.

P. Ingraham (1987). Toward More Systematic Consideration of Policy Design. Policy Studies Journal 15: 611628.

T. J. Lowi (1972). Four Systems of Policy, Politics and Choice. Public Administration Review 32: 298310.

G. Majone (1975) The Feasibility of Social Policies. Policy Sciences 6: 4969.

F. Mosher (1980). The Changing Responsibilities and Tactics of the Federal Government. Public Administration Review 40: 541548.

B. G. Peters (1986). American Public Policy: Promise and Performance. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.

R. Spitzer (1987). Promoting Policy Theory. Policy Studies journal 15: 675689.

D. Torgerson (1985). Contextual Orientation in Policy Analysis. Policy Sciences 18: 241261.

J. Walker (1989). Introduction: Policy Communities as Global Phenomena. Governance 2: 14.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Public Policy
  • ISSN: 0143-814X
  • EISSN: 1469-7815
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-public-policy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *