Skip to main content

Integrating Comparisons Across Time and Space: Methodology and Applications to Disparities within Yugoslavia

  • Pavle Sicherl (a1)

An extended conceptual and analytical framework is elaborated where proximity in time as one dimension of a multidimensional concept of disparity is used as a tool to integrate space and time in comparative analysis. Time distance measures the difference in time (number of years) when two compared units achieve a given level of the indicator. Time distance emphasises a novel perspective of disparity between the compared units, and time is a universal unit of measurement comparable between countries, levels and units of comparison. It complements rather than substitutes for conventional measures, at the conceptual level the overall degree of disparity is looked upon as a weighted combination of static and dynamic dimensions of disparity.

The comparative analysis of socio-economic data sometimes employs comparison across time within a country, e.g. monitoring trends in productivity, per capita income or unemployment. Alternatively, comparison is made across space between countries, e.g. comparing the level of productivity or unemployment in different countries at a given point in time. In each case, the analysis seeks to identify disparities. The purpose of this article is to demonstrate the advantage of analysing disparities, referred to often as inequalities or differences, by intergrating comparisons across both time and space. Empirical examples from the regions (republics and autonomous provinces) of the former Yugoslavia are used to provide empirical illustrations of this expanded analytical framework

Hide All
Hirschmann, A. (1973) ‘Changing Tolerance for Income Inequality in the Course of Economic Development’, Quarterly Journal of Economics.
Kukar, S. and Sicherl, P. (1991) ‘Differences in the Level of Socio-Economic Development between Republics and Autonomous Provinces in Yugoslavia’, Institute for Economic Research, Ljubljana.
Rose, R. (1992) ‘Making Progress and Catching Up, A Time-Space Analysis of Social Welfare across Europe’, Studies in Public Policy 208, CSPP, Glasgow.
Rose, R. and Haerpfer, C. (1992) ‘New Democracies between State and the Market’, Studies in Public Policy 204, CSPP, Glasgow.
Sicherl, P. (1973) ‘Time Distance as a Dynamic Measure of Disparities in Social and Economic Development’, Kyklos, XXVI, Fasc. 3.
Sicherl, P. (1978) ‘S-distance as a Measure of Time Dimension of Disparities’, in Mlinar, Z. and Teune, H., eds, The Social Ecology of Change, London: Sage Publications.
Sicherl, P. (1980) ‘Growth and the Time Dimension of Inequalities’ in Mathews, R. C. O., ed., Economic Growth and Resources, Vol. 2, Trends and Factors, Macmillan for IEA, London.
Sicherl, P. (1987) ‘A New Measure of Disparities in Development’, Discussion Paper No. 356, Economic Growth Center, Yale University, New Haven.
Sicherl, P. (1989) Methods of Measuring Disparities between Men and Women, United Nations Research and Training Institute for Advancement of Women, Santo Domingo.
Sicherl, P. (1990) Slovenija zdaj (Slovenia Now), Gospodarski vestnik, Ljubljana.
United Nations Development Program (1991) Human Development Report 1991. New York: Oxford University Press.
United Nations Research Institute for Social Development (1985) D., McGranahan, Pizaro, E., Richard, C., Measurement and Analysis of Socio-Economic Development, Geneva.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Public Policy
  • ISSN: 0143-814X
  • EISSN: 1469-7815
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-public-policy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed