Skip to main content
×
Home

Intergovernmental climate change mitigation policies: theory and outcomes

  • Hal T. Nelson (a1), Adam Rose (a2), Dan Wei (a3), Thomas Peterson (a4) and Jeffrey Wennberg (a5)...
Abstract
Abstract

This paper develops a framework for analysing intergovernmental relationships around greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation policies along a cooperation-conflict spectrum that affects the probability of their enactment. Cooperative policies, such as federal fiscal transfers to sub-national governments, facilitate enactment. Coordination policies, including enabling and funding mechanisms, promote interdependence between jurisdictions. Competitive policies, such as federal performance standards and price mechanisms, increase political conflict over authority. We categorise 23 policies developed by over 1,500 state stakeholders into the cooperation/coordination/conflict taxonomy. If scaled to the national level, these policies could reduce GHG emissions by over 3 billion tonnes by 2020 and generate nearly 2.2 million jobs (1.19 per cent above baseline projections). Nearly two-thirds of the job gains are from coordinated and cooperative policy options that are unlikely to occur under the status quo policy process. We recommend a national climate action planning process to reduce GHG emissions while increasing aggregate economic efficiency.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Adelman D. E. and Engel K. H. (2007) Adaptive Federalism: The Case Against Reallocating Environmental Regulatory Authority. Minnesota Law Review 92: 17961850.
Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations (1992) Federal Statutory Preemption of State and Local Authority: History, Inventory and Issues, A-121, http://www.library.unt.edu/gpo/acir/Reports/policy/a-121.pdf (accessed 26 October 2012)
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) (2009) Pub. L. No. 111-5, 123 Stat. 115, 516 (Feb. 19, 2009).
Banks J. S. and Duggan J. (2000) A Bargaining Model of Collective Choice. American Political Science Review 94(1): 7388.
Bardach E. (1996) Barriers to Interagency Collaboration. In Kettl D. F. and Milward H. B. (eds.), The State of Public Management. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 168192.
Baron D. P. and Ferejohn J. A. (1989) Bargaining in Legislatures. American Political Science Review 83(4): 11811206.
Bary A. (2010) The JP Morgan Chase Advantage. Barrons, 2 October, 1920.
Black D. (1958) The Theory of Committees and Elections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bendor J., Glazer A. and Hammond T. (2001) Theories of Delegation. Annual Review of Political Science 4: 235269.
Bennett E. (1997) Multilateral Bargaining Problems. Games and Economic Behavior 19(2): 151179.
Betsill M. M. and Bulkeley H. (2004) Transnational Networks and Global Environmental Governance: The Cities for Climate Protection Program. International Studies Quarterly 48(2): 471493.
Biermann F., Pattberg P., van Asselt H. and Zelli F. (2009) The Fragmentation of Global Governance Architectures: A Framework for Analysis. Global Environmental Politics 4: 1440.
Blom-Hansen J. (1999) Policy-Making in Central-Local Government Relations: Balancing Local Autonomy, Macroeconomic Control, and Sectoral Policy Goals. Journal of Public Policy 19(3): 237264.
Breton A. (1998) Competitive Governments: An Economic Theory of Politics and Public Finance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Broder J. M. (2010) “Cap and Trade” Loses its Standing as Energy Policy of Choice. New York Times, 25 March, http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/26/science/earth/26climate.html?_r=0 (accessed 23 October 2012).
Butler C. K., Bellman M. J. and Kichiyev O. A. (2007) Assessing Power in Spatial Bargaining: When is There Advantage to Being Status‐Quo Advantaged? International Studies Quarterly 51(3): 607623.
Camia C. (2012) Top Iowans, Romney at Odds on Subsidy for Wind Power. USA Today, 2 August, http://content.usatoday.com/communities/onpolitics/post/2012/08/mitt-romney-wind-energy-credit-terry-branstad-/1#.U1VjqPldV8E (accessed 14 May 2013).
Cammissa A. M. (1995) Governments as Interest Groups: Intergovernmental Lobbying and the Federal System. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Carley S. (2009) State Renewable Energy Electricity Policies: An Empirical Evaluation of Effectiveness. Energy Policy 37(8): 30713081.
Dinan J. (2008) The State of American Federalism 2007–2008: Resurgent State Influence in the National Policy Process and Continued State Policy Innovation. Publius 38(3): 381415.
Downs A. (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
Drummond W. J. (2010) Statehouse Versus Greenhouse have State-Level Climate Action Planners and Policy Entrepreneurs Reduced Greenhouse Gas Emissions? Journal of the American Planning Association 76(4): 413433.
Elazar D. J. (1991) Cooperative Federalism. In Kenyon D. A. and Kincaid J. (eds.), Competition Among States and Local Governments: Efficiency and Equity in American Federalism. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute, 6586.
Fisher R., Ury W. and Patton B. (1991) Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In , 2nd ed. New York: Penguin Press.
Florida Governor’s Action Team on Energy and Climate Change (FGAT) (2008) Florida’s Energy and Climate Change Action Plan, http://www.flclimatechange.us/stakeholder.cfm (accessed 15 May 2013).
Freeman J. and Farber D. A. (2005) Modular Environmental Regulation. Duke Law Journal 54(4): 795912.
Globe Advisors and Center for Climate Strategies (2012) The West Coast Clean Economy, Opportunities for Investment & Accelerated Job Creation, March, http://www.pacificcoastcollaborative.org/Documents/Reports%20and%20Action%20Items/Final%20WCCE%20Methodology.pdf (accessed 15 May 2013).
Gormley W. T. (2006) Money and Mandates: The Politics of Intergovernmental Conflict. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 36(4): 523540.
Hall T. E. and O’Toole L. J. (2000) Structures for Policy Implementation: An Analysis of National Legislation, 1965–1966 and 1993–1994. Administration and Society 31(6): 667686.
Heinzerling L. (2008) Climate, Preemption, and the Executive Branches. Arizona Law Review 50: 925934.
Hill M. and Hupe P. (2002) Implementing Public Policy: Governance in Theory and in Practice. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.
Hotelling H. (1929) Stability in Competition. Economic Journal 39: 4157.
International Energy Agency (2007) Mind the Gap – Quantifying Principal-Agent Problems in Energy Efficiency, http://www.iea.org/w/bookshop/add.aspx?id=324 (accessed 15 May 2013).
Johnson S. (2007) Letter to Governor Schwarzenegger on Emission Waiver, http://www.cleancarscampaign.org/webcontent/newsroom/docs/121907_EPALetter.pdf (accessed 26 October 2012).
Joskow P. L. and Schmalensee R. (1998) The Political Economy of Market-Based Environmental Policy: The U.S. Acid Rain Program. Journal of Law and Economics 41: 89135.
Krause R. M. (2011) An Assessment of the Greenhouse Gas Reducing Activities Being Implemented in US Cities. Local Environment 16(2): 193211.
Layzer J. (2006) The Environmental Case: Translating Values Into Policy, 2nd ed., Washington, DC: CQ Press.
Lindblom C. (1965) The Intelligence of Democracy. NewYork: The Free Press.
Lubell M., Leach W. D. and Sabatier P. A. (2009) Collaborative Watershed Partnerships in the Epoch of Sustainability. In Mazmanian D. A. and Kraft M. E. (eds.), Towards Sustainable Communities: Transitions and Transformations in Environmental Policy. Cambridge: MIT Press, 255288.
Lutsey N. and Sperling D. (2008) America’s Bottom-Up Climate Change Mitigation Policy. Energy Policy 36(2): 673685.
Maggioni E., Nelson H. and Mazmanian D. (2012) Stakeholder Participation and State Climate Change Policies. Policy Studies Journal 40(2): 234255.
Mazmanian D., Jurewitz J. and Nelson H. (2008) When a Sub-National State Actor Confronts a Global Challenge: California Setting the Pace and Tone of U.S. Climate Change Policy. Journal of Environment and Development 17(4): 401423.
Mazmanian D., Nelson H. and Jurewitz J. (2013) Chapter 17: Climate Change. In Rarik E. (ed.), Governing California: Politics, Government, And Public Policy in the Golden State, 3rd ed. Berkeley: UC Press, 405423.
Mazmanian D. A. and Kraft M. E. (2009) The Three Epochs of the Environmental Movement. In Mazmanian D. A. and Kraft M. E. (eds.), Towards Sustainable Communities: Transitions and Transformations in Environmental Policy. Cambridge: MIT Press, 332.
Meirowitz A. (2007) Communication and Bargaining in the Spatial Model. International Journal of Game Theory 35(2): 251266.
Michigan Climate Action Council (MCAC) (2008) Michigan Climate Action Plan, http://www.miclimatechange.us/stakeholder.cfm (accessed 15 May 2013).
Miller S., Wei D. and Rose A. (2010) The Economic Impact of the Michigan Climate Change Action Plan on the State’s Economy. Report to the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality. The Center for Climate Strategies, Washington, DC.
Molina M., Neubauer M., Sciortino M., Nowak S., Vaidyanathan S., Kaufman N. and Chittum A. (2010) The 2010 State Energy Efficiency Scorecard, ACEEE Report E107, http://www.aceee.org/sites/default/files/publications/researchreports/e107.pdf
Nash J. (1950) The Bargaining Problem. Econometrica 18(2): 155162.
National Research Council (NRC) (2011) America’s Climate Choices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Nelson H. (2012) Government Performance and U.S. Residential Building Energy Codes. In Kugler J. and Tammen R. (eds.), The Performance of Nations. Chapter 12. Boulder, CO: Rowman & Littlefield, 267292.
Nelson H., et al. (2014) The Great Recession or Progressive Energy Policies: Explaining the Decline in Recent US GHG Emissions Forecasts, Working Paper.
Nichols C. (2008) Reducing CO2 Emissions by Improving the Efficiency of the Existing Coal-fired Power Plant Fleet, DOE/NETL-2008/1329, http://www.netl.doe.gov/energy-analyses/pubs/CFPP%20Efficiency-FINAL.pdf (accessed 26 October 2012).
Partridge M. D. and Rickman D. S. (2010) CGE Modelling for Regional Economic Development Analysis. Regional Studies 44(10): 13111328.
Peterson T., Wennberg J., Rose A. and Wei D. (2010a) Impacts of Comprehensive Climate and Energy Policies on the US Economy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University.
Peterson T. P., Wennberg J., Rose A. and Wei D. (2010b) Estimation Methodology for GHG Reduction Potential and Cost-Effectiveness of Super Options. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University.
Posner P. (2007) The Politics of Coercive Federalism in the Bush Era. Publius 37(3): 390412.
Rabe B. (2011) Contested Federalism and American Climate Policy. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 41(3): 494521.
Rabe B. G. (2004) Statehouse and Greenhouse: The Emerging Politics of American Climate Change Policy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Rabe B. G. (2008) Commentary. Arizona Law Review 50: 788792.
Raiffa H. (2002) Negotiation Analysis: The Science and Art of Collaborative Decision Making. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Regional Economic Models, Inc. (REMI) (2009) REMI PI+ Model Document, www.remi.com (accessed 19 January 2011).
Regional Economic Models, Inc. (REMI) (2012) REMI Model Online Documents, http://www.remi.com/ (accessed 15 May 2013).
Richards K. and Richards S. (2009) Comparative Analysis of Climate Change Bills in the U.S. Senate. Environmental Law Reporter 39: 1060110604.
Richardson L. E. and Houston D. J. (2009) Federalism and Safety on America’s Highways. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 39(1): 117137.
Riker W. H. (1980) Implications from the Disequilibrium of Majority Rule for the Study of Institutions. The American Political Science Review 4: 432446.
Rose A. and Miernyk W. (1989) Input-Output Analysis: The First Fifty Years. Economic Systems Research 1(2): 229271.
Rose A. and Wei D. (2009) Macroeconomic Assessment of Action Plan, Chapter 11, Pennsylvania Climate Change Action Plan Final Report, http://www.elibrary.dep.state.pa.us/dsweb/View/Collection-10677
Rose A. and Wei D. (2012) Macroeconomic Impacts of the Florida Energy and Climate Change Action Plan. Climate Policy 12(1): 5069.
Rose A., Wei D. and Dormady N. (2011) Regional Macroeconomic Assessment of the Pennsylvania Climate Action Plan. Regional Science Policy and Practice 3(4): 357379.
Rose A., Wei D. and Prager D. (2012) Distributional Impacts of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading: Alternative Allocation and Recycling Strategies in California. Contemporary Economic Policy 30(4): 603617.
Rubin E. L. and Feeley M. (1993) Federalism: Some Notes on a National Neurosis. UCLA Law Review 41: 903952.
Sabatier P. A. and Jenkins-Smith H. C. (1999) The Advocacy Coalition Framework: An Assessment. In Sabatier P. A. (ed.), Theories of the Policy Process. Boulder: Westview Press, 117168.
Schreurs M. A. (2008) From the Bottom Up Local and Subnational Climate Change Politics. The Journal of Environment & Development 17(4): 343355.
Shepsle K. A. and Weingast B. R. (1987) The Institutional Foundations of Committee Power. American Political Science Review 81(1): 85104.
Snyder J. (2007) Southern Co. Takes Aim at Renewable Energy Bill, Renewable Energy World, 14 May http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/article/2007/05/southern-co-takes-aim-at-renewable-energy-bill-48469 (accessed 25 October 2012).
Sovacol B. K. (2008) The Best of Both Worlds: Environmental Federalism and the Need for Federal Actions on Renewable Energy and Climate Change. Stanford Law Journal 27: 397477.
Stoker R. (1992) Reluctant Partners: Implementing Federal Policy. Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh University Press.
Treyz G. (1993) Regional Economic Modeling: A Systematic Approach to Economic Forecasting and Policy Analysis. Boston: Kluwer.
Urpelainen J. (2012) A Model of Dynamic Climate Governance: Dream Big, Win Small. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 13(2): 119.
US Department of Energy (2012) AEO 2012 Reference Cas e Carbon Dioxide Emissions by Sector and Source, http://www.eia.gov/oiaf/aeo/tablebrowser/#release=AEO2012&subject=0-AEO2012&table=17-AEO2012&region=1-0&cases=ref2012-d020112c (accessed 15 May 2013).
Victor D. G., House J. C. and Joy S. (2005) A Madisonian Approach to Climate Policy. Science 5742: 1820.
Volden C. (2005) Intergovernmental Political Competition in American Federalism. American Journal of Political Science 49(2): 327342.
Weaver J. K. (1986) The Politics of Blame Avoidance. Journal of Public Policy 6(4): 371398.
Wei D. and Rose A. (2011) The Macroeconomic Impact of the New York Climate Action Plan: A Screening Analysis, Report to New York State Energy Research and Development Authority, New York: New York State Energy Research and Development Authority.
Weible C. M. (2005) Beliefs and Perceived Influence in a Natural Resource Conflict: An Advocacy Coalition Approach to Policy Networks. Political Research Quarterly 58(3): 461475.
Wellborn D. M. (1988) Conjoint Federalism and Environmental Regulation in the United States. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 18(1): 2743.
Wheeler S. M. (2008) State and Municipal Climate Change Plans: The First Generation. Journal of the American Planning Association 74(4): 481496.
Wilson W. ([1908] 1961) Constitutional Government in the United States. New York: Columbia University Press.
Winder D. W. and LaPlant J. T. (2000) State Lawsuits Against “Big Tobacco”: A Test of Diffusion Theory. State and Local Government Review 32(2): 132141.
Wood B. D. (1992) Modeling Federal Implementation as a System: The Clean Air Case. American Journal of Political Science 36(1): 4067.
Woods N. D. (2006) Primacy Implementation of Environmental Policy in the U.S. States. Publius 36(2): 259276.
Wright D. S. (2001) Models of National, State and Local Relationships. In O’Toole L. J. Jr. (ed.), American Intergovernmental Relations. Washington, DC: CQ Press, 7488.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Public Policy
  • ISSN: 0143-814X
  • EISSN: 1469-7815
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-public-policy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary Materials

Nelson Supplementary Material
Appendix

 Word (179 KB)
179 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 12
Total number of PDF views: 96 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 365 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 19th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.