Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Intergovernmental climate change mitigation policies: theory and outcomes

  • Hal T. Nelson (a1), Adam Rose (a2), Dan Wei (a3), Thomas Peterson (a4) and Jeffrey Wennberg (a5)...
Abstract
Abstract

This paper develops a framework for analysing intergovernmental relationships around greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation policies along a cooperation-conflict spectrum that affects the probability of their enactment. Cooperative policies, such as federal fiscal transfers to sub-national governments, facilitate enactment. Coordination policies, including enabling and funding mechanisms, promote interdependence between jurisdictions. Competitive policies, such as federal performance standards and price mechanisms, increase political conflict over authority. We categorise 23 policies developed by over 1,500 state stakeholders into the cooperation/coordination/conflict taxonomy. If scaled to the national level, these policies could reduce GHG emissions by over 3 billion tonnes by 2020 and generate nearly 2.2 million jobs (1.19 per cent above baseline projections). Nearly two-thirds of the job gains are from coordinated and cooperative policy options that are unlikely to occur under the status quo policy process. We recommend a national climate action planning process to reduce GHG emissions while increasing aggregate economic efficiency.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

J. S. Banks and J. Duggan (2000) A Bargaining Model of Collective Choice. American Political Science Review 94(1): 7388.

D. P. Baron and J. A. Ferejohn (1989) Bargaining in Legislatures. American Political Science Review 83(4): 11811206.

J. Bendor , A. Glazer and T. Hammond (2001) Theories of Delegation. Annual Review of Political Science 4: 235269.

E. Bennett (1997) Multilateral Bargaining Problems. Games and Economic Behavior 19(2): 151179.

M. M. Betsill and H. Bulkeley (2004) Transnational Networks and Global Environmental Governance: The Cities for Climate Protection Program. International Studies Quarterly 48(2): 471493.

J. Blom-Hansen (1999) Policy-Making in Central-Local Government Relations: Balancing Local Autonomy, Macroeconomic Control, and Sectoral Policy Goals. Journal of Public Policy 19(3): 237264.

C. K. Butler , M. J. Bellman and O. A. Kichiyev (2007) Assessing Power in Spatial Bargaining: When is There Advantage to Being Status‐Quo Advantaged? International Studies Quarterly 51(3): 607623.

S. Carley (2009) State Renewable Energy Electricity Policies: An Empirical Evaluation of Effectiveness. Energy Policy 37(8): 30713081.

J. Dinan (2008) The State of American Federalism 2007–2008: Resurgent State Influence in the National Policy Process and Continued State Policy Innovation. Publius 38(3): 381415.

W. J. Drummond (2010) Statehouse Versus Greenhouse have State-Level Climate Action Planners and Policy Entrepreneurs Reduced Greenhouse Gas Emissions? Journal of the American Planning Association 76(4): 413433.

R. Fisher , W. Ury and B. Patton (1991) Getting to Yes:Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In, 2nd ed. New York: Penguin Press.

W. T. Gormley (2006) Money and Mandates: The Politics of Intergovernmental Conflict. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 36(4): 523540.

T. E. Hall and L. J. O’Toole (2000) Structures for Policy Implementation: An Analysis of National Legislation, 1965–1966 and 1993–1994. Administration and Society 31(6): 667686.

H. Hotelling (1929) Stability in Competition. Economic Journal 39: 4157.

P. L. Joskow and R. Schmalensee (1998) The Political Economy of Market-Based Environmental Policy: The U.S. Acid Rain Program. Journal of Law and Economics 41: 89135.

R. M. Krause (2011) An Assessment of the Greenhouse Gas Reducing Activities Being Implemented in US Cities. Local Environment 16(2): 193211.

M. Lubell , W. D. Leach and P. A. Sabatier (2009) Collaborative Watershed Partnerships in the Epoch of Sustainability. In Mazmanian D. A. and Kraft M. E. (eds.), Towards Sustainable Communities: Transitions and Transformations in Environmental Policy. Cambridge: MIT Press, 255288.

N. Lutsey and D. Sperling (2008) America’s Bottom-Up Climate Change Mitigation Policy. Energy Policy 36(2): 673685.

E. Maggioni , H. Nelson and D. Mazmanian (2012) Stakeholder Participation and State Climate Change Policies. Policy Studies Journal 40(2): 234255.

D. Mazmanian , J. Jurewitz and H. Nelson (2008) When a Sub-National State Actor Confronts a Global Challenge: California Setting the Pace and Tone of U.S. Climate Change Policy. Journal of Environment and Development 17(4): 401423.

D. A. Mazmanian and M. E. Kraft (2009) The Three Epochs of the Environmental Movement. In Mazmanian D. A. and Kraft M. E. (eds.), Towards Sustainable Communities: Transitions and Transformations in Environmental Policy. Cambridge: MIT Press, 332.

A. Meirowitz (2007) Communication and Bargaining in the Spatial Model. International Journal of Game Theory 35(2): 251266.

J. Nash (1950) The Bargaining Problem. Econometrica 18(2): 155162.

M. D. Partridge and D. S. Rickman (2010) CGE Modelling for Regional Economic Development Analysis. Regional Studies 44(10): 13111328.

P. Posner (2007) The Politics of Coercive Federalism in the Bush Era. Publius 37(3): 390412.

B. Rabe (2011) Contested Federalism and American Climate Policy. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 41(3): 494521.

L. E. Richardson and D. J. Houston (2009) Federalism and Safety on America’s Highways. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 39(1): 117137.

A. Rose and W. Miernyk (1989) Input-Output Analysis: The First Fifty Years. Economic Systems Research 1(2): 229271.

A. Rose and D. Wei (2012) Macroeconomic Impacts of the Florida Energy and Climate Change Action Plan. Climate Policy 12(1): 5069.

A. Rose , D. Wei and N. Dormady (2011) Regional Macroeconomic Assessment of the Pennsylvania Climate Action Plan. Regional Science Policy and Practice 3(4): 357379.

A. Rose , D. Wei and D. Prager (2012) Distributional Impacts of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading: Alternative Allocation and Recycling Strategies in California. Contemporary Economic Policy 30(4): 603617.

K. A. Shepsle and B. R. Weingast (1987) The Institutional Foundations of Committee Power. American Political Science Review 81(1): 85104.

M. A. Schreurs (2008) From the Bottom Up Local and Subnational Climate Change Politics. The Journal of Environment & Development 17(4): 343355.

C. Volden (2005) Intergovernmental Political Competition in American Federalism. American Journal of Political Science 49(2): 327342.

J. K. Weaver (1986) The Politics of Blame Avoidance. Journal of Public Policy 6(4): 371398.

C. M. Weible (2005) Beliefs and Perceived Influence in a Natural Resource Conflict: An Advocacy Coalition Approach to Policy Networks. Political Research Quarterly 58(3): 461475.

S. M. Wheeler (2008) State and Municipal Climate Change Plans: The First Generation. Journal of the American Planning Association 74(4): 481496.

D. W. Winder and J. T. LaPlant (2000) State Lawsuits Against “Big Tobacco”: A Test of Diffusion Theory. State and Local Government Review 32(2): 132141.

B. D. Wood (1992) Modeling Federal Implementation as a System: The Clean Air Case. American Journal of Political Science 36(1): 4067.

N. D. Woods (2006) Primacy Implementation of Environmental Policy in the U.S. States. Publius 36(2): 259276.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Public Policy
  • ISSN: 0143-814X
  • EISSN: 1469-7815
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-public-policy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary Materials

Nelson Supplementary Material
Appendix

 Word (179 KB)
179 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 8
Total number of PDF views: 59 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 288 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 29th June 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.