Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Measuring interest group framing strategies in public policy debates

  • Heike Klüver (a1) and Christine Mahoney (a2)
Abstract

Framing plays an important role in lobbying, as interest groups strategically highlight some aspects of policy proposals while ignoring others to shape policy debates in their favour. However, due to methodological difficulties, we have remarkably little systematic data about the framing strategies of interest groups. This article therefore proposes a new technique for measuring interest group framing that is based on a quantitative text analysis of interest group position papers and official policy documents. We test this novel methodological approach on the basis of two case studies in the areas of environmental and transport policy in the European Union. We are able to identify the frames employed by all interest groups mobilised in a debate and assess their effectiveness by studying to what extent decision-makers move closer to their policy positions over the course of the policy debate.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Althaus, S. L. and Kim, Y. M. (2006) Priming Effects in Complex Information Environments: Reassessing the Impact of News Discourse on Presidential Approval. Journal of Politics 68(4): 960976.
Bailey, A. and Schonhardt-Bailey, C. (2008) Does Deliberation Matter in FOMC Monetary Policymaking? The Volcker Revolution of 1979. Political Analysis 16(4): 404427.
Baumgartner, F. R., Berry, J. M., Hojnacki, M., Kimball, D. C. and Leech, B. L. (2009) Lobbying and Policy Change: Who Wins, Who Loses, and Why. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Baumgartner, F. R., De Boef, S. and Boydstun, A. (2008) The Decline of the Death Penalty and the Discovery of Innocence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Baumgartner, F. R. and Jones, B. D. (1993) Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Baumgartner, F. R. and Jones, B. D. (2009) Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Baumgartner, F. R. and Leech, B. L. (2001) Interest Niches and Policy Bandwagons: Patterns of Interest Group Involvement in National Politics. Journal of Politics 63(4): 11911213.
Berinsky, A. J. and Kinder, D. R. (2006) Making Sense of Issues through Media Frames: Understanding the Kosovo Crisis. Journal of Politics 68(3): 640656.
Budge, I., Klingemann, H.-D., Volkens, A., Bara, J. and Tanenbaum, E. (2001) Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments 1945-1998. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bunea, A. (2013) Issues, Preferences and Ties: Determinants of EU Interest Groups’ Preference Attainment in the Environmental Policy Area. Journal of European Public Policy 20(4): 552570.
Dür, A. and De Bièvre, D. (2007) The Question of Interest Group Influence. Journal of Public Policy 27(1): 112.
Entman, R. M. (1991) Framing US Coverage of International news: Contrasts in Narratives of the KAL and Iran Air Incidents. Journal of Communication 43(4): 5158.
Greenacre, M. J. (1984) Theory and Application of Correspondence Analysis. London: Academic Press.
Grimmer, J. (2010) A Bayesian Hierarchical Topic Model for Political Texts: Measuring Expressed Agendas in Senate Press Releases. Political Analysis 18(1): 135.
Klingemann, H.-D., Volkens, A., Bara, J. L., Budge, I. and McDonald, M. D. (2006) Mapping Policy Preferences II: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments in Eastern Europe, European Union, and OECD 1990-2003. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Klüver, H. (2009) Measuring Interest Group Influence using Quantitative Text Analysis. European Union Politics 10(4): 535549.
Klüver, H. (2011) The Contextual Nature of Lobbying: Explaining Lobbying Success in the European Union. European Union Politics 12(4): 483506.
Klüver, H. (2012) Biasing Politics? Interest Group Participation in European Policy-Making. West European Politics 35(5): 11141133.
Klüver, H. (2013a) Lobbying as a Collective Enterprise: Winners and Losers of Policy Formulation in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy 20(1): 5976.
Klüver, H. (2013b) Lobbying in the European Union: Interest Groups, Lobbying Coalitions and Policy Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lancia, F. (2007) Word Co-occurrence and Similarity in Meaning: Some Methodological Issues, http://www.mytlab.com/wcsmeaning.pdf (accessed 15 June 2012).
Laver, M., Benoit, K. and Garry, J. (2003) Extracting Policy Positions from Political Texts using Word as Data. American Political Science Review 97(2): 311331.
Mahoney, C. (2007) Lobbying Success in the United States and the European Union. Journal of Public Policy 27(1): 3556.
Mahoney, C. (2008) Brussels Versus the Beltway: Advocacy in the United States and the European Union. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Miller, M. M. (1997) Frame Mapping and Analysis of News Coverage of Contentious Issues. Social Science Computer Review 15(4): 367378.
Peffley, M. and Hurwitz, J. (2007) Persuasion and Resistance: Race and the Death Penalty in America. American Journal of Political Science 51(4): 9961012.
Quinn, K. M., Monroe, B., Colaresi, M., Crespin, M. and Radev, D. (2010) How to Analyze Political Attention with Minimal Assumptions and Costs. American Journal of Political Science 54(1): 209228.
Riker, W. (1986) The Art of Political Manipulation. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Riker, W. (1996) The Strategy of Rhetoric: Campaigning for the American Constitution. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Schonhardt-Bailey, C. (2005a) Measuring Ideas More Effectively: An Analysis of Bush and Kerry’s National Security Speeches. PS: Political Science & Politics 38(4): 701711.
Schonhardt-Bailey, C. (2005b) Measuring Ideas More Effectively: An Analysis of Bush and Kerry’s National Security Speeches. PS: Political Science 38(4): 701711.
Schonhardt-Bailey, C. (2006) From the Corn Laws to Free Trade: Interests, Ideas, and Institutions in Historical Perspective. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Schonhardt-Bailey, C. (2008) The Congressional Debate on Partial-Birth Abortion: Constitutional Gravitas and Moral Passion. British Journal of Political Science 38(3): 383410.
Schonhardt-Bailey, C. (2012) Looking at Congressional Committee Deliberations from Different Perspectives: Is the Added Effort Worth It? Paper presented at the ESRC Methods Festival, Oxford, 5 July.
Shah, D. V., Watts, M. D. W., Domke, D. D. and Fan, D. P. (2002) News Framing and Cueing of Issue Regimes: Explaining Clinton’s Public Approval in Spite of Scandal. Public Opinion Quarterly 66(3): 339370.
Sharp, E. B. and Joslyn, M. (2003) Individual and Contextual Effects on Attributions about Pornography. Journal of Politics 63(2): 501519.
Slapin, J. B. and Proksch, S.-O. (2008) A Scaling Model for Estimating Time-Series Party Positions from Texts. American Journal of Political Science 52(3): 705722.
Steinbach, M., Karypis, G. and Kumar, V. (2000) A Comparison of Document Clustering Techniques, Technical Report #00-034, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Minnesota.
Thomson, R. (2011) Resolving Controversy in the European Union: Legislative Decision-Making Before and After Enlargement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Weale, A., Bicquelet, A. and Bara, J. (2012) Debating Abortion, Deliberative Reciprocity and Parliamentary Advocacy. Political Studies 60(3): 643667.
Yackee, S. W. (2005) Sweet-Talking the Fourth Branch: The Influence of Interest Group Comments on Federal Agency Rulemaking. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16(1): 103124.
Yackee, J. W. and Yackee, S. W. (2005) A Bias Towards Business? Assessing Interest Group Influence on the U.S. Bureaucracy. Journal of Politics 68(1): 128139.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Public Policy
  • ISSN: 0143-814X
  • EISSN: 1469-7815
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-public-policy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed