Anderson, S. and Habel, P. (2009) Revisiting Adjusted ADA Scores for the U.S. Congress, 1947-2007. Political Analysis
Auerswald, D. and Maltzman, F. (2003) Policymaking Through Advice and Consent: Treaty Consideration by the United States Senate. Journal of Politics
Baumgartner, F. R. and Leech, B. L. (1998) Basic Interests: The Importance of Groups in Politics and Political Science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Beckman, M. N. (2010) Pushing the Agenda: Presidential Leadership in U.S. Lawmaking, 1953-2004. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Binder, S. A. (2003) Stalemate: Causes and Consequences of Legislative Gridlock. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Cameron, C. M. (2000) Veto Bargaining: Presidents and the Politics of Negative Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carroll, R., Lewis, J., Lo, J., McCarty, N., Poole, K. and Rosenthal, H. (2015) “Common Space” DW-NOMINATE Scores with Bootstrapped Standard Errors (Joint House and Senate Scaling), voteview.com/data (accessed April 2015)
Chiou, F.-Y. and Rothenberg, L. S. (2003) When Pivotal Politics Meets Partisan Politics. American Journal of Political Science
Chiou, F.-Y. and Rothenberg, L. S. (2006) Preferences, Parties, and Legislative Productivity. American Politics Research
Clinton, J. D. (2007) Lawmaking and Roll Calls. Journal of Politics
Covington, C. R. and Bargen, A. A. (2004) Comparing Floor-Dominated and Party-Dominated Explanations of Policy Change in the House of Representatives. Journal of Politics
Cox, G. W. and McCubbins, M. D. (2005) Setting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the U.S. House of Representatives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Epstein, D. and O’Halloran, S. (1999) Delegating Powers: A Transaction Cost Politics Approach to Policy Making Under Separate Powers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Groseclose, T., Levitt, S. and Snyder, J. (1999) Comparing Interest Group Scores Across Time and Chambers: Adjusted ADA Scores for the U.S. Congress. American Political Science Review
Harbridge, L. (2015) Is Bipartisanhip Dead?: Policy Agreement and Agenda-Setting in the House of Representatives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heitshusen, V. and Young, G. (2006) Macro-Politics and Changes in the U.S. Code: Testing Competing Theories of Policy Production, 1874-1946. In Adler E. S. and Lapinski J. (eds.), The Macropolitics of Congress. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 129–150.
Howell, W. (2003) Power Without Persuasion: The Politics of Direct Presidential Action. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Howell, W., Adler, E. S., Cameron, C. and Riemann, C. (2000) Divided Government and the Legislative Productivity of Congress, 1945-94. Legislative Studies Quarterly
Jenkins, J. A. and Monroe, N. W. (2016) On Measuring Legislative Agenda-Setting Power. American Journal of Political Science
Johnson, T. R. and Roberts, J. M. (2005) Pivotal Politics, Presidential Capital, and Supreme Court Nominations. Congress & the Presidency
Krehbiel, K. (1998) Pivotal Politics: A Theory of U.S. Lawmaking. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Krehbiel, K. (2006a) Macropolitics and Micromodels: Cartels and Pivots Reconsidered. In Adler E. S. and Lapinski J. (eds.), The Macropolitics of Congress. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 21–49.
Krehbiel, K. (2006b) Pivots. In Weingast B. R. and Wittman D. A. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 223–240.
Krehbiel, K., Meirowitz, A. and Woon, J. (2005) Testing Theories of Lawmaking. In Austen-Smith D. and Duggan J. (eds.), Social Choice and Strategic Decisions: Essays in Honor of Jeffrey S. Banks. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 249–268.
Krehbiel, K. and Peskowitz, Z. (2015) Legislative Organization and Ideal-Point Bias. Journal of Theoretical Politics
Lapinski, J. S. (2008) Policy Substance and Performance in American Lawmaking, 1877-1994. American Journal of Political Science
Lapinski, J. S. (2013) The Substance of Representation: Congress, American Political Development, and Lawmaking. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Lee, F. E. (2009) Beyond Ideology: Politics, Principles, and Partisanship in the US Senate. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Madonna, A. J. (2011) Winning Coalition Formation in the U.S. Senate: The Effects of Legislative Decisions Rules and Agenda Change. American Journal of Political Science
Mayhew, D. R. (2005 ) Divided We Govern: Party Control, Lawmaking, and Investigations, 1946-2002, 2nd ed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
McCarty, N., Poole, K. and Rosenthal, H. (2006) Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Moe, T. and Howell, W. (1999) Unilateral Action and Presidential Power. Presidential Studies Quarterly
Oh, J. S. (2015) The Pivotal Politics of Temporary Legislation. Iowa Law Review
Poole, K. T. (2007) Changing Minds? Not in Congress!
Primo, D. M., Binder, S. A. and Maltzman, F. (2008) Who Consents? Competing Pivots in Federal Judicial Selection. American Journal of Political Science
Richman, J. (2011) Parties, Pivots, and Policy: The Status Quo Test. American Political Science Review
Romer, T. and Rosenthal, H. (1978) Political Resource Allocation, Controlled Agendas, and the Status Quo. Public Choice
Smith, S. S. (2007) Party Influence in Congress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stiglitz, E. H. and Weingast, B. R. (2010) Agenda Control in Congress: Evidence from Cutpoint Estimates and Ideal Point Uncertainty. Legislative Studies Quarterly
Stimson, J. A. (1991) Public Opinion in America: Moods, Cycles, and Swings. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Wawro, G. J. and Schickler, E. (2004) Where’s the Pivot? Obstruction and Lawmaking in the Pre-Cloture Senate. American Journal of Political Science
Wawro, G. J. and Schickler, E. (2006) Filibuster: Obstruction and Lawmaking in the U.S. Senate. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Woon, J. (2009) Change We Can Believe In? Using Political Science to Predict Policy Change in the Obama Presidency. PS: Political Science & Politics
Woon, J. and Cook, I. P. (2015) Competing Gridlock Models and Status Quo Policies. Political Analysis