Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Howlett, Michael P.
Tan, Seck
Wellstead, Adam
Migone, Andrea
and
Evans, Bryan Mitchell
2013.
The 'Lumpiness' Thesis Revisited: The Venues of Policy Work and the Distribution of Analytical Techniques in Canada.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
del Rio, Pablo
and
Howlett, Michael P.
2013.
Beyond the 'Tinbergen Rule' in Policy Design: Matching Tools and Goals in Policy Portfolios.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Jordan, Andrew
and
Russel, Duncan
2014.
Embedding the Concept of Ecosystem Services? The Utilisation of Ecological Knowledge in Different Policy Venues.
Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy,
Vol. 32,
Issue. 2,
p.
192.
Howlett, Michael
Migone, Andrea
and
Tan, Seck L.
2014.
Duplicative or Complementary? The Relationship between Policy Consulting and Internal Policy Analysis in Canadian Government.
Canadian Journal of Political Science,
Vol. 47,
Issue. 1,
p.
113.
Vigoda-Gadot, Eran
Cohen, Haim
and
Zalmanovitch, Yair
2014.
Does the privatizing of policy formation threaten democracy? Arguments from the Israeli experience.
Policy Studies,
Vol. 35,
Issue. 5,
p.
484.
Howlett, Michael P.
and
Mukherjee, Ishani
2014.
Policy Design and Non-Design: Towards a Spectrum of Policy Formulation Types.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Howlett, Michael
Tan, Seck L
Migone, Andrea
Wellstead, Adam
and
Evans, Bryan
2014.
The distribution of analytical techniques in policy advisory systems: Policy formulation and the tools of policy appraisal.
Public Policy and Administration,
Vol. 29,
Issue. 4,
p.
271.
Jung, Arlena
Korinek, Rebecca-Lea
and
Straßheim, Holger
2014.
Embedded expertise: a conceptual framework for reconstructing knowledge orders, their transformation and local specificities.
Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research,
Vol. 27,
Issue. 4,
p.
398.
Craft, Jonathan
2015.
Revisiting the Gospel: Appointed Political Staffs and Core Executive Policy Coordination.
International Journal of Public Administration,
Vol. 38,
Issue. 1,
p.
56.
Shaw, Richard
and
Eichbaum, Chris
2015.
Follow the Yellow Brick Road: New Directions in Studying Political Advisers in Executive Government.
International Journal of Public Administration,
Vol. 38,
Issue. 1,
p.
1.
Howlett, M
2015.
Policy analytical capacity: The supply and demand for policy analysis in government.
Policy and Society,
Vol. 34,
Issue. 3-4,
p.
173.
Robson, Jennifer
2015.
Spending on Political Staffers and the Revealed Preferences of Cabinet: Examining a New Data Source on Federal Political Staff in Canada.
Canadian Journal of Political Science,
Vol. 48,
Issue. 3,
p.
675.
Connaughton, Bernadette
2015.
Navigating the Borderlines of Politics and Administration: Reflections on the Role of Ministerial Advisers.
International Journal of Public Administration,
Vol. 38,
Issue. 1,
p.
37.
Shaw, Richard
and
Eichbaum, Chris
2015.
Following the Yellow Brick Road: Theorizing the Third Element in Executive Government.
International Journal of Public Administration,
Vol. 38,
Issue. 1,
p.
66.
Craft, Jonathan
2015.
Conceptualizing the policy work of partisan advisers.
Policy Sciences,
Vol. 48,
Issue. 2,
p.
135.
Mukherjee, Ishani
and
Howlett, Michael P.
2015.
Who is a Stream? Epistemic Communities, Instrument Constituencies and Advocacy Coalitions in Multiple Streams Subsystems.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Öberg, PerOla
Lundin, Martin
and
Thelander, Jonas
2015.
Political Power and Policy Design: Why Are Policy Alternatives Constrained?.
Policy Studies Journal,
Vol. 43,
Issue. 1,
p.
93.
Fortier, Isabelle
Emery, Yves
and
Roldan, Rachel
2016.
Des conditions et enjeux de la politisation de l’administration publique au regard de l’ethos public : une étude comparée (Canada/Suisse) de l’expérience des cadres dirigeants.
Gestion et management public,
Vol. Volume 4 / n° 4,
Issue. 2,
p.
75.
Béland, Daniel
and
Howlett, Michael
2016.
How Solutions Chase Problems: Instrument Constituencies in the Policy Process.
Governance,
Vol. 29,
Issue. 3,
p.
393.
Marier, Patrik
2016.
Devine intervention? Lessons in systemic retrenchment from Canada’s most generous welfare state.
Regional & Federal Studies,
Vol. 26,
Issue. 2,
p.
221.