Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Ties that count: explaining interest group access to policymakers

  • Jan Beyers (a1) and Caelesta Braun (a2)
Abstract
Abstract

The degree to which interest groups gain access to policymakers has often been explained by focusing on the exchange of resources in a dyadic relation between interest groups and policymakers. This article argues that the position an interest group occupies within a coalition and the relations it has outside its coalition substantially affect the likelihood of gaining access to policymakers. Our empirical focus is on the Dutch interest group system for which we examine how coalitions among groups and the network position of interest groups within and between such coalitions shape access. The analysis, based on data collected among 107 Dutch interest groups and 28 policymakers, leads to the conclusion that network positions count differently for elected and non-elected officials, and that network ties that bridge different coalitions add significant explanatory leverage to resource-based explanations of access.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Atkinson M. M. Coleman W. D. (1992) Policy Networks, Policy Communities and the Problems of Governance. Governance 5(2): 154180.
Austen-Smith D. (1995) Campaign Contributions and Access. American Political Science Review 89(3): 566581.
Baumgartner F. R. Leech B. L. (2001) Interest Niches and Policy Bandwagons: Patterns of Interest Group Involvement in National Politics. Journal of Politics 63(4): 11911213.
Baumgartner F. R., Berry J. M., Hojnacki M., Kimball D. C., Leech B. L. (2009) Lobbying and Policy Change: Who Wins, Who Loses, and Why. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Beyers J. (2002) Gaining and Seeking Access. The European Adaptation of Domestic Interest Associations. European Journal of Political Research 41(5): 585612.
Beyers J. (2004) Voice and Access. The Political Practices of European Interest Associations. European Union Politics 5(2): 211240.
Beyers J. Kerremans B. (2004) Bureaucrats, Politicians, and Societal Interests. How is European Policy-Making Politicized? Comparative Political Studies 37(10): 131.
Beyers J. Kerremans B. (2012) Domestic Embeddedness and the Dynamics of Multi-Level Venue-Shopping in Four EU Member-States. Governance 25(2): 262290.
Binderkrantz A. (2005) Interest Group Strategies: Navigating Between Privileged Access and Strategies of Pressure. Political Studies 53(4): 694715.
Binderkrantz A. (2008) Different Groups, Different Strategies: How Interest Groups Pursue Their Political Ambitions. Scandinavian Political Studies 31(2): 173200.
Borgatti S. P., Everett M. G., Freeman L. C. (1999) UCINET 5.0 for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Natick: Analytic Technologies.
Bouwen P. (2002) Corporate Lobbying in the European Union: The Logic of Access. Journal of European Public Policy 9(3): 365390.
Braun C. (2012) The Captive or the Broker? Explaining Public Agency-Interest Group Interactions. Governance 25(2): 291314.
Breiger R. L., Boorman S. A., Arabie Ph. (1975) An Algorithm for Clustering Relational Data, with Application to Social Network Analysis and Comparison with Multidimensional Scaling. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 12: 328383.
Burt R. (1978) Cohesion Versus Structural Equivalence as a Basis for Network Subgroups. Sociological Methods and Research 7: 189212.
Burt R. S. (2004) Structural Holes and Good Ideas. American Journal of Sociology 110(2): 349399.
Carpenter D. P., Esterling K. M., Lazer D. M. J. (1998) The Strength of Weak Ties in Lobbying Networks. Evidence from Health-Care Politics in the United States. Journal of Theoretical Politics 10(4): 417444.
Carpenter D. P., Esterling K. M. et al. (2003) The Strength of Strong Ties. A Model of Contact-Making in Policy Networks with Evidence from US Health Politics. Rationality and Society 15(4): 411440.
Carpenter D. P., Esterling K. M. et al. (2004) Friends, Brokers, and Transitivity: Who Informs Whom in Washington Politics? The Journal of Politics 66(1): 224246.
Crombez C. (2002) Information, Lobbying and the Legislative Process in the European Union. European Union Politics 3(1): 732.
Dow M. M., Burton M. L., White D. R., Reitz K. P. (1984) Galton's Problem as Network Autocorrelation. American Ethnologist 11(4): 754770.
Eising R. (2004) Multilevel Governance and Business Interests in the European Union. Governance 17(2): 211245.
Eising R. (2007) The Access of Business Interests to EU Political Institutions: Towards Elite Pluralism? Journal of European Public Policy 14(2): 348403.
Granovetter M. S. (1973) The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology 78(6): 13601380.
Gray V. Lowery D. (1998) To Lobby Alone or in a Flock. Foraging Behavior Among Organized Interests. American Politics Quarterly 26(1): 534.
Hall R. L. Deardorff A. V. (2006) Lobbying as a Legislative Subsidy. American Political Science Review 100(1): 6984.
Hansen J. M. (1991) Gaining Access. Congress and the Farm Lobby, 1919–1981. London: The University of Chicago Press.
Heaney M. T. (2004) Issue Networks, Information, and Interest Group Alliances: The Case of Wisconsin Welfare Politics, 1993–1999. State Politics and Policy Quarterly 4(3): 237270.
Heaney M. T. (2006) Brokering Health Policy: Coalitions, Parties, and Interest Group Influence. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 31(5): 887994.
Heinz J. P., Laumann E. O., Nelson R. L., Salisbury R. H. (1993) The Hollow Core. Private Interests in National Policy Making. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Henning C. H. C. A. (2009) Networks of Power in the CAP System of the EU-15 and EU-27. Journal of Public Policy 29(2): 153177.
Hojnacki M. (1997) Interest Groups’ Decisions to Join Alliances or Work Alone. American Journal of Political Science 41(1): 6187.
Hula K. W. (1999) Lobbying Together. Interest Group Coalitions in Legislative Politics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Jones B. D. Baumgartner F. R. (2005) The Politics of Attention. How Government Prioritizes Problems. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
Kollman K. (1998) Outside Lobbying. Public Opinion and Interest Group Strategies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Kriesi H., Tresch A., Jochum M. (2007) Going Public in the European Union. Action Repertoires of Western European Collective Political Actors. Comparative Political Studies 40(1): 4873.
Kriesi H., Adam S., Jochum M. (2006) Comparative Analysis of Policy Networks in Europe. Journal of European Public Policy 13(3): 341361.
Laumann E. O. Knoke D. (1987) The Organizational State. Social Choice in National Policy Domains. Wisconsin: The University of Wisconsin Press.
Leenders R. T. A. J. (2002) Modeling Social Influence Through Network Autocorrelation: Constructing the Weight Matrix. Social Networks 24(1): 2146.
Leifeld P. Schneider V. (2012) Information Exchange in Policy Networks. American Journal of Political Science 56(3): 731744.
Long S. J. (1997) Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. London: Sage.
Mahoney C. (2007) Networking vs. Allying: The Decision of Interest Groups to Join Coalitions in the US and the EU. Journal of European Public Policy 14(2): 366383.
Maloney W. A., Jordan G., McLaughlin A. M. (1994) Interest Groups and Public Policy: The Insider/Outsider Model Revisited. Journal of Public Policy 14(1): 1738.
Mizruchi M. S. Neuman E. J. (2008) The Effect of Density on the Level of Bias in the Network Autocorrelation Model. Social Networks 30: 190200.
O'Malley A. J. Marsden P. V. (2008) The Analysis of Social Networks. Health Services and Outcomes Research Methdology 8(4): 222269.
Pappi F. U. Henning C. H. C. A. (1998) Policy Networks: More Than a Metaphor. Journal of Theoretical Politics 10(4): 553575.
Pappi F. U. Henning C. H. C. A. (1999) The Organization of Influence on the EC's Common Agricultural Policy: A Network Approach. European Journal of Political Research 36(2): 257281.
Phillips S. D. (1991) Meaning and Structure in Social Movements: Mapping the Network of National Canadian Women's Organizations. Canadian Journal of Political Science 24(4): 755782.
Poppelaars C. (2009a) Resource Exchange in Urban Governance: On the Means that Matter. Urban Affairs Review 43(1): 327.
Poppelaars C. (2009b) Steering a Course Between Friends and Foes. Why Bureaucrats Interact with Interest Groups. Delft: Eburon.
Poppelaars C. Scholten P. (2008) Two Worlds Apart: The Divergence of National and Local Immigrant Integration Policies in the Netherlands. Administration and Society 40(4): 335357.
Rhodes R. A. W. Marsh D. (1992) New Directions in the Study of Policy Networks. European Journal of Political Research 21(1–2): 161205.
Sabatier P. A. (1988) An Advocacy Coalition Framework of Policy Change and the Role of Policy-Oriented Learning Therein. Policy Sciences 2–3(21): 129168.
Scharpf F. W. (1997) Games Real Actors Play. Actor-Centered Institutionalism in Policy Research. Oxford: Westview Press.
Sloof R. (1998) Game-Theoretic Models of the Political Influence of Interest Groups. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Wasserman S. Faust K. (1998) Social Network Analysis. Methods and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zafonte M. Sabatier P. (1998) Shared Beliefs and Imposed Interdependencies as Determinants of Ally Networks in Overlapping Subsystems. Journal of Theoretical Politics 10(4): 473505.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Public Policy
  • ISSN: 0143-814X
  • EISSN: 1469-7815
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-public-policy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 21
Total number of PDF views: 264 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 640 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 23rd February 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.