Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Understanding rationales for collaboration in high-intensity policy conflicts

  • Christopher M. Weible (a1), Tanya Heikkila (a2) and Jonathan Pierce (a3)
Abstract
Abstract

Why people collaborate to achieve their political objectives is one enduring question in public policy. Although studies have explored this question in low-intensity policy conflicts, a few have examined collaboration in high-intensity policy conflicts. This study asks two questions: What are the rationales motivating policy actors to collaborate with each other in high-intensity policy conflicts? What policy actor attributes are associated with these rationales? This study uses questionnaire data collected in 2013 and 2014 of policy actors from New York, Colorado and Texas who are actively involved with hydraulic fracturing policy debates. The results show that professional competence is the most important rationale for collaborating, whereas shared beliefs are moderately important, and financial resources are not important. Policy actor attributes that are associated with different rationales include organisational affiliation and extreme policy positions. This article concludes with a discussion on advancing theoretical explanations of collaboration in high-intensity policy conflicts.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

G. Bel and M. E. Warner (2015) Inter-Municipal Cooperation and Costs: Expectations and Evidence. Public Administration 93(1): 5267.

R. Berardo and J. T. Scholz (2010) Self‐Organizing Policy Networks: Risk, Partner Selection, and Cooperation in Estuaries. American Journal of Political Science 54(3): 632649.

J. C. Calanni , S. N. Siddiki , C. M. Weible and W. D. Leach (2014) Explaining Coordination in Collaborative Partnerships and Clarifying the Scope of the Belief Homophily Hypothesis. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 25(3): 901927.

C. Davis (2012) The Politics of “Fracking”: Regulating Natural Gas Drilling Practices in Colorado and Texas. Review of Policy Research 29(2): 177191.

D. Elgin (2015) Cooperative Interactions Among Friends and Foes Operating Within Collaborative Governance Arrangements. Public Administration 93(3): 769787.

J. M. Fisk (2013) The Right to Know? State Politics of Fracking Disclosure. Review of Policy Research 30(4): 345365.

V. Gray and D. Lowery (1996) A Niche Theory of Interest Representation. The Journal of Politics 58(1): 91111.

B. W. Head and J. Alford (2015) Wicked Problems: Implications for Public Policy and Management. Administration & Society 47(6): 711739.

T. Heikkila and A. K. Gerlak (2005) The Formation of Large-Scale Collaborative Resource Management Institutions: Clarifying the Roles of Stakeholders, Science, and Institutions. Policy Studies Journal 33(4): 583612.

T. Heikkila and C. Weible (2016) Contours of Coalition Politics in the United States. In Weible, C. , Heikkila T. , Ingold K. and Fischer M. (eds.), Policy Debates on Hydraulic Fracturing: Comparing Coalition Politics in North America and Europe. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2952.

A. D. Henry (2011) Power, Ideology, and Policy Network Cohesion in Regional Planning. Policy Studies Journal 39(3): 361383.

K. Ingold and M. Fischer (2014) Drivers of Collaboration to Mitigate Climate Change: An Illustration of Swiss Climate Policy Over 15 Years. Global Environmental Change 24: 8898.

K. Jacobs (2010) The Politics of Partnerships: A Study of Policy and Housing Collaboration to Tackle Anti-Social Behavior on Australian Public Housing Estates. Public Administration 88(4): 928942.

H. D. Lasswell (1971) A Pre-View of Policy Sciences. New York: American Elsevier.

M. Levi and L. Stoker (2000) Political Trust and Trustworthiness. Annual Review of Political Science 3: 475507.

M. Lubell (2007) Familiarity Breeds Trust: Collective Action in a Policy Domain. Journal of Politics 69(1): 237250.

S. Matti and A. Sandström (2011) The Rationale Determining Advocacy Coalitions: Examining Coordination Networks and Corresponding Beliefs. Policy Studies Journal 39(3): 385410.

K. McNutt and L. A. Pal (2011) Modernizing Government: Mapping Global Public Policy Networks. Governance 24(3): 439467.

D. Nohrstedt and O. Bodin (2014) Evolutionary Dynamics of Crisis Preparedness: Resources, Turbulence, and Network Change in Swedish Municipalities. Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy 5(2): 134155.

E. Ostrom (1998) A Behavioral Approach to the Rational Choice Theory of Collective Action: Presidential Address American Political Science Association, 1997. American Political Science Review 92(1): 122.

H. H. Park and R. K. Rethemeyer (2012) The Politics of Connections: Assessing the Determinants of Social Structure in Policy Networks. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 24(2): 349379.

S. H. Park , R. Chen and S. Gallagher (2002) Firm Resources as Moderators of the Relationship Between Market Growth and Strategic Alliances in Semiconductor Start-Ups. Academy of Management Journal 45: 527545.

J. Pfeffer and P. Nowak (1976) Joint Ventures and Interorganizational Interdependence. Administrative Science Quarterly 21: 398418.

K. G. Provan , J. M. Beyer and C. Kruytbosch (1980) Environmental Linkages and Power in Resource-Dependence Relations Between Organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly 25: 200225.

S. E. Robinson and B. S. Gaddis (2012) Seeing Past Parallel Play: Survey Measures of Collaboration in Disaster Situations. Policy Studies Journal 40(2): 256273.

P. A. Sabatier (1988) An Advocacy Coalition Framework of Policy Change and the Role of Policy-Oriented Learning Therein. Policy Sciences 21: 129168.

B. Warner and J. Shapiro (2013) Fractured, Fragmented Federalism: A Study in Fracking Regulatory Policy. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 43: 464496.

C. Weare , P. Lichterman and N. Esparza (2014) Collaboration and Culture: Organizational Culture and the Dynamics of Collaborative Policy Networks. Policy Studies Journal 42(4): 590619.

C. M. Weible (2005) Beliefs and Policy Influence: An Advocacy Coalition Approach to Policy Networks. Political Research Quarterly 58(3): 461477.

C. M. Weible , P. A. Sabatier and A. Pattison (2010) Harnessing Expert-Based Information for Learning and Sustainable Management of Complex Socio-Ecological Systems. Environmental Science and Policy 13: 522534.

C. M. Weible and T. Heikkila (2017) Policy Conflict Framework. Policy Sciences, forthcoming.

M. Zafonte and P. A. Sabatier (2004) Short‐Term Versus Long‐Term Coalitions in the Policy Process: Automotive Pollution Control, 1963–1989. Policy Studies Journal 32(1): 75107.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Public Policy
  • ISSN: 0143-814X
  • EISSN: 1469-7815
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-public-policy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 8
Total number of PDF views: 42 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 231 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 6th February 2017 - 24th May 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.