Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Understanding rationales for collaboration in high-intensity policy conflicts

  • Christopher M. Weible (a1), Tanya Heikkila (a2) and Jonathan Pierce (a3)
Abstract
Abstract

Why people collaborate to achieve their political objectives is one enduring question in public policy. Although studies have explored this question in low-intensity policy conflicts, a few have examined collaboration in high-intensity policy conflicts. This study asks two questions: What are the rationales motivating policy actors to collaborate with each other in high-intensity policy conflicts? What policy actor attributes are associated with these rationales? This study uses questionnaire data collected in 2013 and 2014 of policy actors from New York, Colorado and Texas who are actively involved with hydraulic fracturing policy debates. The results show that professional competence is the most important rationale for collaborating, whereas shared beliefs are moderately important, and financial resources are not important. Policy actor attributes that are associated with different rationales include organisational affiliation and extreme policy positions. This article concludes with a discussion on advancing theoretical explanations of collaboration in high-intensity policy conflicts.

Copyright
References
Hide All
BacharachM. and GambettaD. (2001) Trust in Signs. In Cook, K.S. (ed.), Trust in Society. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 148184.
BelG. and WarnerM. E. (2015) Inter-Municipal Cooperation and Costs: Expectations and Evidence. Public Administration 93(1): 5267.
BerardoR. (2010) Sustaining Joint Ventures: The Role of Resource Exchange and the Strength of Interorganizational Relationships. In Scholz J. T. and Feiock R.C. (eds.), Self Organizing Federalism: Collaborative Mechanisms to Mitigate Institutional Collective Action Dilemmas. New York: Cambridge University Press, 204228.
BerardoR. and ScholzJ. T. (2010) Self‐Organizing Policy Networks: Risk, Partner Selection, and Cooperation in Estuaries. American Journal of Political Science 54(3): 632649.
BernauerT. and CaduffL. (2004) In Whose Interest? Pressure Group Politics, Economic Competition and Environmental Regulation. Journal of Public Policy 24(1): 99126.
BoudetH. S. and OrtolanoL. (2010) A Tale of Two Sitings: Contentious Politics in Liquefied Natural Gas in the United States. Environmental Politics 20: 786806.
CalanniJ. C., SiddikiS. N., WeibleC. M. and LeachW. D. (2014) Explaining Coordination in Collaborative Partnerships and Clarifying the Scope of the Belief Homophily Hypothesis. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 25(3): 901927.
ColemanJ. S. (1990) Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
DahlR. (1963) Modern Political Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Inc.
DavisC. (2012) The Politics of “Fracking”: Regulating Natural Gas Drilling Practices in Colorado and Texas. Review of Policy Research 29(2): 177191.
DawesR. M. (1973) The Commons Dilemma Game: An N-Person Mixed Motive Game With a Dominating Strategy for Defection. ORI Research Bulletin 13(2): 112.
ElginD. (2015) Cooperative Interactions Among Friends and Foes Operating Within Collaborative Governance Arrangements. Public Administration 93(3): 769787.
FeiockR. (2013) The Institutional Collective Action Framework. Policy Studies Journal 3(41): 397425.
FergusonR. F. and StoutlandS. E. (1999) Reconceiving the Community Development Field. In Ferguson R. F. and Dickens W. T. (eds.), Urban Problems and Community Development. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 3376.
FestingerL. (1962) A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
FischerM., IngoldK., SciariniP. and VaroneF. (2015) Dealing With Bad Guys: Actor-and Process-Level Determinants of the “Devil Shift” in Policy Making. Journal of Public Policy 36(2): 126.
FiskJ. M. (2013) The Right to Know? State Politics of Fracking Disclosure. Review of Policy Research 30(4): 345365.
GerlakA., HeikkilaT. and LubellM. (2012) The Promise and Performance of Collaborative Governance. In Kamieniecki S. and Kraft M. E. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of U.S. Environmental Policy . Oxford: Oxford University Press, 413434.
GrayV. and LoweryD. (1996) A Niche Theory of Interest Representation. The Journal of Politics 58(1): 91111.
HeadB. W. and AlfordJ. (2015) Wicked Problems: Implications for Public Policy and Management. Administration & Society 47(6): 711739.
HeikkilaT. and GerlakA. K. (2005) The Formation of Large-Scale Collaborative Resource Management Institutions: Clarifying the Roles of Stakeholders, Science, and Institutions. Policy Studies Journal 33(4): 583612.
HeikkilaT. and WeibleC. (2016) Contours of Coalition Politics in the United States. In Weible, C. , Heikkila T. , Ingold K. and Fischer M. (eds.), Policy Debates on Hydraulic Fracturing: Comparing Coalition Politics in North America and Europe. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2952.
HeikkilaT., WeibleC. M. and PierceJ. J. (2014) Exploring the Policy Narratives and Politics of Hydraulic Fracturing in New York. In McBeth, M. , Jones M. and Shanahan E. (eds.), The Science of Stories: Applications of the Narrative Policy Framework. New York: Palgrave, 185206.
HenryA. D. (2011) Power, Ideology, and Policy Network Cohesion in Regional Planning. Policy Studies Journal 39(3): 361383.
IngoldK. and FischerM. (2014) Drivers of Collaboration to Mitigate Climate Change: An Illustration of Swiss Climate Policy Over 15 Years. Global Environmental Change 24: 8898.
JacobsK. (2010) The Politics of Partnerships: A Study of Policy and Housing Collaboration to Tackle Anti-Social Behavior on Australian Public Housing Estates. Public Administration 88(4): 928942.
Jenkins-SmithH., NohrstedtD., WeibleC. M. and SabatierP. A. (2014) The Advocacy Coalition Framework: Foundations, Evolution, and Ongoing Research. In Sabatier, P. and Weible C. M. (eds.), Theories of the Policy Process, 3rd ed. Boulder, CO: Westview, 183224.
Jenkins-SmithH. and St. ClairG. (1993) The Politics of Offshore Energy: Empirically Testing the Advocacy Coalition Framework. In Sabatier P. and Jenkins-Smith H. (eds.), Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 149176.
LasswellH. D. (1956) The Decision Process. College Park, MD: University of Maryland Press.
LasswellH. D. (1971) A Pre-View of Policy Sciences. New York: American Elsevier.
LeviM. (2000) When Good Defenses Make Good Neighbors. In Menard C. (ed.), Institutions, Contracts, and Organizations: Perspectives from New Institutional Economics. Chichester, UK: Edward Elgar, 137157.
LeviM. and StokerL. (2000) Political Trust and Trustworthiness. Annual Review of Political Science 3: 475507.
LubellM. (2007) Familiarity Breeds Trust: Collective Action in a Policy Domain. Journal of Politics 69(1): 237250.
MattiS. and SandströmA. (2011) The Rationale Determining Advocacy Coalitions: Examining Coordination Networks and Corresponding Beliefs. Policy Studies Journal 39(3): 385410.
McNuttK. and PalL. A. (2011) Modernizing Government: Mapping Global Public Policy Networks. Governance 24(3): 439467.
NohrstedtD. and BodinO. (2014) Evolutionary Dynamics of Crisis Preparedness: Resources, Turbulence, and Network Change in Swedish Municipalities. Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy 5(2): 134155.
OlsonM. (1965) The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
OrcuttM. (2011) How Much U.S. Shale Gas is There, Really?. MIT Technology Review, 31 August, http://www.technologyreview.com/article/425286/how-much-us-shale-gas-is-there-really/ (accessed 26 January 2017).
OstromE. (1998) A Behavioral Approach to the Rational Choice Theory of Collective Action: Presidential Address American Political Science Association, 1997. American Political Science Review 92(1): 122.
ParkH. H. and RethemeyerR. K. (2012) The Politics of Connections: Assessing the Determinants of Social Structure in Policy Networks. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 24(2): 349379.
ParkS. H., ChenR. and GallagherS. (2002) Firm Resources as Moderators of the Relationship Between Market Growth and Strategic Alliances in Semiconductor Start-Ups. Academy of Management Journal 45: 527545.
PfefferJ. and NowakP. (1976) Joint Ventures and Interorganizational Interdependence. Administrative Science Quarterly 21: 398418.
ProvanK. G., BeyerJ. M. and KruytboschC. (1980) Environmental Linkages and Power in Resource-Dependence Relations Between Organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly 25: 200225.
PutnamR. (1976) The Comparative Study of Political Elites. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
RichardsonN., GottliebM., KrupnickA. and WisemanH. (2013) The State of Shale Gas Regulation. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC, http://www.rff.org/rff/documents/RFF-Rpt-StateofStateRegs_Report.pdf (accessed 26 January 2017).
RobinsonS. E. and GaddisB. S. (2012) Seeing Past Parallel Play: Survey Measures of Collaboration in Disaster Situations. Policy Studies Journal 40(2): 256273.
SabatierP. A. (1988) An Advocacy Coalition Framework of Policy Change and the Role of Policy-Oriented Learning Therein. Policy Sciences 21: 129168.
SabatierP. A. (1991) Toward Better Theories of the Policy Process. PS: Political Science and Politics 24(2): 147156.
SabatierP. A., FochtW., LubellM., TrachtenbergZ., VedlitzA. and MatlockM. (eds.) (2005) Swimming Upstream: Collaborative Approaches to Watershed Management. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
SabatierP. A. and Jenkins-SmithH. (eds.) (1993) Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
ScottW. R. and MeyerJ. W. (1991) The Organization of Societal Sectors: Propositions and Early Evidence. In Powell W. W. and DiMaggio P. J. (eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Studies. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 108140.
TillyC. and TarrowS. (2007) Contentious Politics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
US Energy Information Administration (2014a) Colorado State Profile and Energy Analysis. US Energy Information Administration, Washington, DC, http://www.eia.gov/state/analysis.cfm?sid=CO (accessed 26 January 2017).
US Energy Information Administration (2014b) Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production. US Energy Information Administration, Washington, DC, http://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/ng_prod_sum_dcu_NUS_m.htm (accessed 26 January 2017).
US Energy Information Administration (2014c) Texas Field Production of Crude Oil (Data File). US Energy Information Administration, Washington, DC, http://tonto.eia.gov/dnav/pet/hist/LeafHandler.ashx?n=PET&s=MCRFPTX1&f=M (accessed 26 January 2017).
US Energy Information Administration (2015) Drilling Productivity Report for Key Tight Oil and Shale Gas Regions. US Energy Information Administration, Washington, DC, http://www.eia.gov/petroleum/drilling/pdf/dpr-full.pdf (accessed 26 January 2017).
WarnerB. and ShapiroJ. (2013) Fractured, Fragmented Federalism: A Study in Fracking Regulatory Policy. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 43: 464496.
WeareC., LichtermanP. and EsparzaN. (2014) Collaboration and Culture: Organizational Culture and the Dynamics of Collaborative Policy Networks. Policy Studies Journal 42(4): 590619.
WeibleC. M. (2005) Beliefs and Policy Influence: An Advocacy Coalition Approach to Policy Networks. Political Research Quarterly 58(3): 461477.
WeibleC. M., SabatierP. A. and PattisonA. (2010) Harnessing Expert-Based Information for Learning and Sustainable Management of Complex Socio-Ecological Systems. Environmental Science and Policy 13: 522534.
WeibleC. and HeikkilaT. (2014) Fracking Resolution in New York – Escalation of Fracking Politics Across the Nation. The Conversation, 22 December, http://theconversation.com/fracking-resolution-in-new-york-escalation-of-fracking-politics-across-the-nation-35655#comment_548955 (accessed 26 January 2017).
WeibleC. and HeikkilaT. (2016) Policy Conflict Theory. Presented at the Midwest Political Science Association Annual Meeting, 7–10 April, Chicago, IL.
WeibleC. M. and HeikkilaT. (2017) Policy Conflict Framework. Policy Sciences, forthcoming.
ZafonteM. and SabatierP. A. (2004) Short‐Term Versus Long‐Term Coalitions in the Policy Process: Automotive Pollution Control, 1963–1989. Policy Studies Journal 32(1): 75107.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Public Policy
  • ISSN: 0143-814X
  • EISSN: 1469-7815
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-public-policy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 11
Total number of PDF views: 96 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 500 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 6th February 2017 - 20th October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.