Skip to main content Accessibility help

When and how can advocacy groups promote new technologies? Conditions and strategies for effectiveness

  • Sung Eun Kim (a1) and Johannes Urpelainen (a2)

When and how can advocacy groups influence the diffusion of new technologies, such as wind power? We examine the relationship between two different strategies that advocacy groups can adopt: political lobbying and campaigns aimed at potential end users of the new technology. Our game-theoretic analysis shows that without the opportunity to engage in political lobbying, end user campaigns by an advocacy group have the counterproductive effect of reducing the government's incentive to subsidise the new technology. Instead of supporting the advocacy group's campaigning, the government free rides on the social movement's campaigning efforts. While political lobbying cannot prevent free riding, it increases the government's incentive to subsidise the new technology, and thus increases the advocacy group's payoff. These findings suggest that advocacy groups can promote technology diffusion if they can effectively deploy a dual strategy of political lobbying and end user campaigning.

Hide All
Abbott, K. W.Snidal, D. (2010) International Regulation Without International Government: Improving IO Performance Through Orchestration. Review of International Organizations 5(3): 315344.
Ainsworth, S.Sened, I. (1993) The Role of Lobbyists: Entrepreneurs with Two Audiences. American Journal of Political Science 37(3): 834866.
Arthur, W. B. (1989) Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns and Lock-in by Historical Events. Economic Journal 99(1): 106131.
Austen-Smith, D. (1993) Information and Influence: Lobbying for Agendas and Votes. American Journal of Political Science 37(3): 799833.
Baron, D. P. (2001) Private Politics, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Integrated Strategy. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 10(1): 745.
Baron, D. P. (2009) A Positive Theory of Moral Management, Social Pressure, and Corporate Social Performance. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 18(1): 743.
Beise, M. (2004) Lead Markets: Country-Specific Drivers of the Global Diffusion of Innovations. Research Policy 33(6–7): 9971018.
Binder, S.Neumayer, E. (2005) Environmental Pressure Group Strength and Air Pollution: An Empirical Analysis. Ecological Economics 55(4): 527538.
Cashore, B. (2002) Legitimacy and the Privatization of Environmental Governance: How Non-State Market-Driven (NSMD) Governance Systems Gain Rule-Making Authority. Governance 15(4): 503529.
Cowan, R.Gunby, P. (1996) Sprayed to Death: Path Dependence, Lock-in and Pest Control Strategies. Economic Journal 106(436): 521542.
Dalton, R. J. (1994) The Green Rainbow: Environmental Interest Groups in Western Europe. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Dalton, R. J.Rohrschneider, R. (2003) The Environmental Movement and the Modes of Political Action. Comparative Political Studies 36(7): 743771.
del Río, P.Unruh, G. C. (2007) Overcoming the Lock-Out of Renewable Energy Technologies in Spain: The Cases of Wind and Solar Electricity. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 11(7): 14981513.
Dingwerth, K. (2005) The Democratic Legitimacy of Public-Private Rule Making: What Can We Learn from the World Commission on Dams? Global Governance 11(1): 6583.
Dingwerth, K. (2008) Private Transnational Governance and the Developing World: A Comparative Perspective. International Studies Quarterly 52(3): 607634.
Falkner, R. (2003) Private Environmental Governance and International Relations: Exploring Links. Global Environmental Politics 3(2): 7887.
Feddersen, T. J.Gilligan, T. W. (2001) Saints and Markets: Activists and the Supply of Credence Goods. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 10(1): 149171.
Grossman, G. M.Helpman, E. (1994) Protection for Sale. American Economic Review 84(4): 833850.
Grossman, G. M.Helpman, E. (2001) Special Interest Politics. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Grübler, A., Nakićenović, N.Victor, D. G. (1999) Dynamics of Energy Technologies and Global Change. Energy Policy 27(5): 247280.
Gulbrandsen, L. H. (2004) Overlapping Public and Private Governance: Can Forest Certification Fill the Gaps in the Global Forest Regime? Global Environmental Politics 4(2): 7599.
Gulbrandsen, L. H. (2008) Accountability Arrangements in Non-State Standards Organizations: Instrumental Design and Imitation. Organization 15(4): 563683.
Gullberg, A. T. (2008) Lobbying Friends and Foes in Climate Policy: The Case of Business and Environmental Interest Groups in the European Union. Energy Policy 36(8): 29642972.
Hall, R. L.Deardorff, A. V. (2006) Lobbying as Legislative Subsidy. American Political Science Review 100(1): 6984.
Heymann, M. (1998) Signs of Hubris: The Shaping of Wind Technology Styles in Germany, Denmark, and the United States, 1940–1990. Technology and Culture 39(4): 641670.
Huber, J. (2008) Pioneer Countries and the Global Diffusion of Environmental Innovations: Theses From the Viewpoint of Ecological Modernisation Theory. Global Environmental Change 18(3): 360367.
Keck, M. E.Sikkink, K. (1998) Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Keohane, N. O., Revesz, R. L.Stavins, R. N. (1998) The Choice of Regulatory Instruments in Environmental Policy. Harvard Environmental Law Review 22(2): 313367.
Laird, F. N.Stefes, C. (2009) The Diverging Paths of German and United States Policies for Renewable Energy: Sources of Difference. Energy Policy 37(7): 26192629.
Lanjouw, J. O.Mody, A. (1996) Innovation and the International Diffusion of Environmentally Responsive Technology. Research Policy 25(4): 549571.
Lipp, J. (2007) Lessons for Effective Renewable Electricity Policy from Denmark, Germany and the United Kingdom. Energy Policy 35(11): 54815495.
Lyon, T. P.Yin, H. (2010) Why Do States Adopt Renewable Portfolio Standards?: An Empirical Investigation. Energy Journal 31(3): 131155.
Michaelowa, A. (2005) The German Wind Energy Lobby: How to Promote Costly Technological Change Successfully. European Environment 15: 192199.
Nemet, G. F.Kammen, D. M. (2007) U.S. Energy Research and Development: Declining Investment, Increasing Need, and the Feasibility of Expansion. Energy Policy 35(1): 746755.
O'Rourke, D. (2003) Outsourcing Regulation: Analyzing Nongovernmental Systems of Labor Standards and Monitoring. Policy Studies Journal 31(1): 129.
Pattberg, P. H. (2005) The Forest Stewardship Council: Risk and Potential of Private Forest Governance. Journal of Environment and Development 14: 356374.
Perez, Y.Ramos-Real, F. J. (2009) The Public Promotion of Wind Energy in Spain from the Transaction Costs Perspective 1986–2007. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 13(5): 10581066.
Prakash, A.Potoski, M. (2006) The Voluntary Environmentalists: Green Clubs, ISO 14001, and Voluntary Environmental Regulations. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Price, R. (1998) Reversing the Gun Sights: Transnational Civil Society Targets Land Mines. International Organization 52(3): 613644.
Rabe, B. (2004) Statehouse and Greenhouse: The Evolving Politics of American Climate Change Policy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Shaiko, R. G. (1999) Voices and Echoes for the Environment: Public Interest Representation in the 1990s and Beyond. New York: Columbia University Press.
Vasi, I. B. (2011) Winds of Change: The Environmental Movement and the Global Development of the Wind Energy Industry. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Vogel, D. (2008) Private Global Business Regulation. Annual Review of Political Science 11: 261282.
Wapner, P. (1995) Politics Beyond the State: Environmental Activism in World Civic Politics. World Politics 47(3): 311340.
Zarco-Jasso, H. (2005) Public-Private Partnerships: A Multidimensional Model for Contracting. International Journal of Public Policy 1(1–2): 2240.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Public Policy
  • ISSN: 0143-814X
  • EISSN: 1469-7815
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-public-policy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed