Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-dvmhs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-07T09:30:31.614Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparing Three Methods of Measuring Race/Ethnicity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2017

Paru R. Shah  and
Nicholas R. Davis
Paru R. Shah*
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee
Nicholas R. Davis
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Paru Shah, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, WI. E-mail: shahp@uwm.edu
Get access

Abstract

In this research note, we explore compare and contrast three methods for measuring race. We utilize as our baseline, or “true”, measure expert coded racial categories, and to this compare two alternatives. The first is a hybrid Bayesian analysis of racial/ethnic surname lists and population distributions, which allow us to develop a race probability score for each candidate. The second is a novel and innovative crowdsourcing method that allows many contributors to classify the racial identity of candidates. We analyze and discuss the potential benefits, pitfalls, and tradeoffs of each method. We conclude with the implications of these new measures for future election research as well as race and politics scholarship more broadly.

Keywords

crowdsourcingexpert-coded dataBayesian codingreliabilityvalidity
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Race, Ethnicity, and Politics , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , March 2017 , pp. 124 - 139
Copyright
Copyright © The Race, Ethnicity, and Politics Section of the American Political Science Association 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adjaye-Gbewonyo, Dzifa, Bednarczyk, Robert A., Davis, Robert L., and Omer, Saad B.. 2014. “Using the Bayesian Improved Surname Geocoding Method (BISG) to create a working classification of race and ethnicity in a diverse managed care population: a validation study.” Health Services Research 49 (1): 268–83.Google Scholar
Alonso, Omar and Baeza-Yates, Ricardo. 2011. “Design and Implementation of Relevance Assessments using Crowdsourcing.” In Advances in Information Retrieval: 33rd European Conference on IR Research, Dublin, Ireland, April 18–21, 2011. Proceedings. Editors: Clough, Paul, Foley, Colum, Gurrin, Cathal, Jones, Gareth, Kraaij, Wessel, Lee, Hyowon, Mudoch, Vanessa. Springer, 153–64.Google Scholar
Alonso, Omar and Mizzaro, Stefano. 2009. Can we get rid of TREC assessors? Using Mechanical Turk for relevance assessment. In Proceedings of the SIGIR 2009 Workshop on the Future of IR Evaluation. pp. 15–16.Google Scholar
Benoit, Kenneth, Conway, Drew, Lauderdale, Benjamin E., Laver, Michael, and Mikhaylov, Slava. 2016. “Crowd-sourced Text Analysis: Reproducible and Agile Production of Political Data.” American Political Science Review 110 (2): 278–95.Google Scholar
Berinsky, Adam J., Huber, Gregory A., and Lenz, Gabriel S.. 2012. “Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon. com's Mechanical Turk.” Political Analysis 20 (3): 351–68.Google Scholar
Bothwell, Robert K., Brigham, John C., and Malpass, Roy S.. 1989. “Cross-racial Identification.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 15 (1): 19–25.Google Scholar
Chiroro, Patrick and Valentine, Tim. 1995. “An Investigation of the Contact Hypothesis of the Own-Race Bias in Face Recognition.” The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 48 (4): 879–94.Google Scholar
Dehon, Hedwige and Brédart, Serge. 2001. “An Other-Race Effect in Age Estimation from Faces.” Perception 30 (9): 1107–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elliott, Marc N., Fremont, Allen, Morrison, Peter A., Pantoja, Philip, and Lurie, Nicole. 2008. “A New Method for Estimating Race/Ethnicity and Associated Disparities Where Administrative Records Lack Self-Reported Race/Ethnicity.” Health Services Research 43 (5 Part 1): 1722–36.Google Scholar
Enos, Ryan D. 2015. “The Effect of Proximity to African-Americans on Latino Vote Choice in the 2008 Presidential Primary in Los Angeles.” http://people.hmdc.harvard.edu/renos/papers/threat_LosAngeles_primary.pdf (Accessed August 15, 2016).Google Scholar
Furl, Nicholas, Phillips, P. Jonathan, and O'Toole, Alice J.. 2002. “Face Recognition Algorithms and the Other-Race Effect: Computational Mechanisms for a Developmental Contact Hypothesis.” Cognitive Science 26 (6): 797–815.Google Scholar
Goldstone, Robert L. 2003. “Do We All Look Alike to Computers?” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7 (2): 55–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hanson, Andrew and Hawley, Zackary. 2011. “Do Landlords Discriminate in the Rental Housing Market? Evidence from an Internet Field Experiment in US Cities.” Journal of Urban Economics 70 (2): 99–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horton, John J., Rand, David G., and Zeckhauser, Richard J.. 2011. “The Online Laboratory: Conducting Experiments in a Real Labor Market.” Experimental Economics 14 (3): 399–425.Google Scholar
Hsueh, Pei-Yun, Melville, Prem, and Sindhwani, Vikas. 2009. Data quality from crowdsourcing: a study of annotation selection criteria. In Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2009 Workshop on Active Learning for Natural Language Processing. Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 27–35.Google Scholar
Imai, Kosuke, and Khanna, Kabir. 2016. “Improving Ecological Inference by Predicting Individual Ethnicity from Voter Registration Records.” Political Analysis 24(2): 263–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juenke, Eric Gonzalez and Shah, Paru. 2015. “Not the Usual Story: The Effect of Candidate Supply on Models of Latino Descriptive Representation.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 3(3): 438–53.Google Scholar
Lauderdale, Diane S. and Bert, Kestenbaum. 2000. “Asian American Ethnic Identification by Surname.” Population Research and Policy Review 19 (3): 283–300.Google Scholar
Meissner, Christian A. and Brigham, John C.. 2001. “Thirty Years of Investigating the Own-Race Bias in Memory for Faces: A Meta-Analytic Review.” Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 7 (1): 3.Google Scholar
Morrison, Peter A. and Coleman, Charles D.. 2001. “Using First Names to Estimate Racial Proportions in Populations.” Paper Presented at the Population Association of America Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Nicoll, Angus, Bassett, Karen, and Ulijaszek, Stanley J.. 1986. “What's in a Name? Accuracy of using Surnames and Forenames in Ascribing Asian Ethnic Identity in English Populations.” Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 40 (4): 364–68.Google Scholar
Omi, Michael and Winant, Howard. 1986. Racial Formation in the United States: From the 1960s to the 1980s. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
O'Toole, Alice J., Peterson, Jennifer, and Deffenbacher, Kenneth A.. 1996. “An ‘Other-Race Effect’ for Categorizing Faces by Sex.” Perception 25: 669–76.Google Scholar
Paolacci, Gabriele, Chandler, Jesse, and Ipeirotis, Panagiotis G.. 2010. “Running Experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk.” Judgment and Decision making 5 (5): 411–19.Google Scholar
Rhodes, Gillian, Locke, Vance, Ewing, Louise, and Evangelista, Emma. 2009. “Race Coding and the Other-Race Effect in Face Recognition.” Perception 38 (2): 232.Google Scholar
Rhodes, Gillian, Hayward, William G., and Winkler, Christopher. 2006. “Expert Face Coding: Configural and Component Coding of Own-Race and Other-Race Faces.” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 13 (3): 499–505.Google Scholar
Snow, Rion, O'Connor, Brendan, Jurafsky, Daniel, and Ng, Andrew Y.. 2008. Cheap and Fast—But is it Good?: Evaluating Non-Expert Annotations for Natural Language Tasks. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 254–63.Google Scholar
U.S. Census Bureau. 1990. Selected Population Characteristics, 1990 Census of Population and Housing. http://www.census.gov/main/www/cen1990.html.Google Scholar
U.S. Census Bureau. 2000. Selected Population Characteristics, 2000 Census of Population and Housing. http://www.census.gov/main/www/cen1990.html.Google Scholar
Word, David L., Coleman, Charles D., Nunziata, Robert, and Kominski, Robert. 2008. “Demographic aspects of surnames from census 2000.” Unpublished Manuscript, http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/ download (Accessed August 15, 2016).Google Scholar