Skip to main content Accessibility help

A focus group consultation round exploring patient experiences of comfort during radiotherapy for head and neck cancer

  • Simon D. Goldsworthy (a1), Kelly Tuke (a1) and Jos M. Latour (a1)



The aim of this study was to consult patients about their experiences of comfort while wearing a thermoplastic mask during head and neck radiotherapy before designing a study to develop a comfort scale for radiotherapy.


A qualitative method using a focus group of patients receiving radiotherapy for head and neck cancer was deployed. Five patients were invited and agreed to participate. Semi-structured questions guided the focus group interview. Thematic analysis was used to identify themes.


Three patients participated in the focus group. Three main themes were identified: Physical comfort, Mental perception, Passivity. Physical comfort derived from feelings of pressure, unpleasantness, and generally being uncomfortable. Mental perception derived from how the physical comfort was perceived and derived from feelings of shock, anxiety, indifference and sensory systems. Passivity arose from feelings such as the ‘doctor knows best’, ‘putting up with it’, and ‘being taken for a ride’.


The insight of patient’s comfort and experiences are valuable for clinicians to provide patient-centred care. Findings of this study implicate further investigation of how the themes of patient comfort can be measured in radiotherapy to improve the patient experience.


Corresponding author

Correspondence to: Simon D Goldsworthy, Radiotherapy, Beacon Cancer Centre, Taunton, Somerset Taunton, Somerset, TA1 5DA UK. Tel: 01823 344250; E-mail:,


Hide All
1.The Royal College of Radiologists, Society and College of Radiographers, Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine. On Target: Ensuring Geometric Accuracy in Radiotherapy. London, UK: The Royal College of Radiologists, 2008: 11–14.
2.Boda-Heggeman, J, Walter, C, Rahn, A, et al. Repositioning accuracy of two different mask systems – 3D revisited: comparison using true 3D/3D matching with cone-beam CT. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006; 66: 15681575.
3.Dobbs, J, Barratt, A, Morris, S, Roques, T. Practical Radiotherapy Planning, 4th edition. UK: Hodder Arnold, 2009.
4.Leitzen, C, Wilhelm-Buchstab, T, Garbe, Set al. Quality of patient positioning during cerebral tomotherapy irradiation using different mask systems. Strahlenther Onkol 2014; 190: 382385.
5.Dahele, M, Verbakel, W, Cuijpers, J, Slotman, B, Senan, S. An analysis of patient positioning during stereotactic lung radiotherapy performed without rigid external immobilization. Radiother Oncol 2012; 104: 2832.
6.Mullaney, L M, O’Shea, E, Dunne, M Tet al. A randomized trial comparing bladder volume consistency during fractionated prostate radiation therapy. Pract Radiat Oncol 2014; 4: e203e212.
7.Cheng, F, Wang, W. Factors influencing comfort level in head and neck neoplasm patients receiving radiotherapy. Int J Nur Scie 2014; 1: 394399.
8.Kolcaba, K, Tilton, C, Drouin, C. Comfort theory: a unifying framework to enhance the practice environment. J Nurs Adm 2006; 36: 538544.
9.Kolcaba, K, Steiner, R. Empirical evidence for the nature of holistic comfort. J Holist Nurs 2000; 18: 4662.
10.Pineau, C. The Psychological Meaning of Comfort. International Review of Applied Psychology, Volume 31. Paris, France: SAGE, 1982: 271283.
11.Bartlett, F R, Colgan, R M, Carr, Ket al. The UK HeartSpare Study: randomised evaluation of voluntary deep-inspiratory breath-hold in women undergoing breast radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2013; 108: 242247.
12.Nutting, C M, Khoo, V S, Walker, Vet al. A randomized study of the use of a customized immobilization system in the treatment of prostate cancer with conformal radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2000; 54: 19.
13.Cox, J, Davison, A. Comfort as a determiner of treatment position in radiotherapy of the male pelvis. Radiography 2005; 11: 109115.
14.Maclsaac, S C, Doucette, J. Patient assessment. In: Washington C M, Leaver D (eds) Principles and Practice of Radiation Therapy, 4th edition. USA: Elsevier Mosby, 2015: 219--239.
15.Braun, V, Clarke, V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitat Res Psychol 2006; 3: 77101.
16.Kruger, R, Casey, M. Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research, 3rd edition. USA: Sage Publications, 2000.
17.Krueger, R A. Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research, 2nd edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2000.
18.Creswell, J W. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method Approaches, 3rd edition. CA: SAGE, 2009.
19.Flinton, D D, Owens, A. Sampling Errors, Bias and Objectivity in Ramlaul. A Medical Imaging and Radiotherapy Research, Skills and Strategies. UK: Churchill Livingstone, 2010.
20.Rubin, H, Rubin, I. Qualitative Interviewing, 3rd edition. USA: Sage, 2012.
21.Kidd, P, Parshall, M. Getting the focus and the group: enhancing analytical rigor in focus group research. Qualitative Health Research 2000; 10: 293308.
22.Williams, P, Wilford, B, Cutler, S, Qualitative analysis in Ramlaul. A Medical Imaging and Radiotherapy Research, Skills and Strategies. UK: Churchill Livingstone, 2010.
23.Medical Research Council. Good Research Practice; Principles and Guidelines. UK: Medical Research Council, 2012.
24.Onwuegbuzie, A J, Dickinson, W B, Leech, N L, Zoran, A G. A qualitative framework for collecting and analyzing data in focus group research. Int J Qual Meth 2009; 8: 121.
25.National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Patient and public involvement in health and social care research: a handbook for researchers…/RDS-PPIHandbook-2014-v8-FINAL.pdf. Accessed on 20th November 2015.
26.Arino, C, Stadelmaier, N, Dupin, C, Kantor, G, Henriques de Figueiredo, B. Thermoplastic mask in radiotherapy: a source of anxiety for the patient? Cancer Radiother 2014; 18: 753756.
27.van der Steen, J T, Sampson, E L, Van den Block, Let al. Tools to assess pain or lack of comfort in dementia: a content analysis. J Pain Symptom Manage 2015; 50: 659675.
28.Bayley, A J, Catton, C N, Haycocks, Tet al. Randomized trial of supine vs. prone positioning in patients undergoing escalated dose conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol 2004; 70: 3744.
29.Appleton, L, Wyatt, D, Perkins, Eet al. The impact of prostate cancer on men’s everyday life. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2015; 24: 7184.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice
  • ISSN: 1460-3969
  • EISSN: 1467-1131
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-radiotherapy-in-practice
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed