Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-jtdwj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T14:56:47.363Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The scholarly radiation therapist. Part one: charting the territory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2008

Nicole Harnett ,
Cathryne Palmer ,
Amanda Bolderston ,
Julie Wenz  and
Pamela Catton
Nicole Harnett
Affiliation:
Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Cathryne Palmer
Affiliation:
Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Amanda Bolderston
Affiliation:
Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Julie Wenz
Affiliation:
Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Pamela Catton
Affiliation:
Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

As radiation therapy practice evolves with advancing treatment and planning technologies, merging of imaging modalities, changing working models and the advancement to higher education, radiation therapists are frequently finding themselves on the frontline of translating new knowledge into practice. To a large degree, this growing involvement in self-directed original research, with associated dissemination of completed results, has led to an increasing number of therapists being encouraged to pursue an academic path in addition to a clinical career. In Canada, radiation therapists are being appointed as faculty to university departments for the first time. It is heartening that such opportunities are increasing; therapists are able to play a profound role in developing an evidence-based professional body of knowledge while at the same time being recognised for scholarly endeavours. However, despite these many positive steps, barriers and challenges to the development of a scholarly culture for radiation therapists still exist. Part one of this two-part series explores the history of the profession and the subsequent development of a scholarly culture.

Keywords

Academic practiceprofessionalisationprofessional structurescholarship

Information

Type
Original Article
Information
Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , June 2008 , pp. 99 - 104
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Smith, MJ, Liehr, P.Story theory: advancing nursing practice scholarship. Holist Nurse Pract 2005;19(6):272–276.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nixon, S.Undergraduate research: theory or practice? Radiography 1999; 5:237–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, IS.The emergence of clinical scholarship as a professional imperative. J Prof Nurs 1986; 2:318–325.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wood, SO, Biordi, DL, Miller, BA, Poncar, P, Snelson, CM, Banks, MJ, Hemminger, SA.Boyer’s model of scholarship applied to a career ladder for nontenured nursing faculty. Nurse Educ 1998;23(3):33–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Riley, JM, Beal, J, Levi, P, McCausland, MP.Revisioning nursing scholarship. J Nurs Scholarsh 2002; 34(4):383–390.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diers, D.Clinical Scholarship. J Prof Nurs 1995; 11:24–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crookes, PA, Bradshaw, PL.Developing scholarship in nursing—steps within a strategy. J Nurs Manag 2002;10:177–181.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, EG, Van Ort, S.Facilitating scholarship among clinical faculty. J Prof Nurs 2001; 17(3):141–146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Higgs, J, Titchell, A (eds). Practice Knowledge and Expertise in the Health Professions. Oxford: Buttersworth Heinemann, 2001.Google Scholar
Pearson, P, Jones, K.The Primary Health Care Non-Team? BMJ 1994;309:1387–1388.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bolderston, A.Advanced practice perspectives in radiation therapy. J Radiother Pract 2005; 4:1–5.Google Scholar
International Commission on Radiological Protection. Prevention of Accidental Exposures to Patients Undergoing Radiation Therapy. Publication 86. 2000Google Scholar
Bloom, S.Structure and ideology in medical education: an analysis of resistance to change. J Health Soc Behav 1988;29:294–306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baird, M.Evolution of a degree program: the Australian example. Radiol Technol 1992;63:404–409.Google ScholarPubMed
Canadian Association of Medical Radiation Technologists. Degree Education for Medical Radiation Technologists: The Facts and the Fiction Behind CAMRT’s Education Plans. Ottawa, Canada 1998.Google Scholar
Schön, D.Educating the Reflective Practitioner. San Francisco: Josey-Bass, 1987.Google Scholar
Manning, D, Bentley, HB.The consultant radiographer and a doctorate degree. Radiography 2003; 9:3–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nixon, S.Professionalism in radiography. Radiography 2001; 7:31–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, R.Find and deliver: research and practice in therapeutic radiography. Radiography 2000; 6:225–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colyer, H.The role of the radiotherapy treatment review radiographer. Radiography 2000;6:253–260.Google Scholar
Boyer, EL.Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, 1990.Google Scholar