Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-03T03:39:23.943Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Stereotactic radiosurgery in brain metastasis: treatment outcomes and patterns of failure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 March 2023

Menekse Turna*
Affiliation:
Department of Radiation Oncology, Anadolu Medical Center, Gebze, Kocaeli, Turkey
Rashad Rzazade
Affiliation:
Department of Radiation Oncology, Anadolu Medical Center, Gebze, Kocaeli, Turkey
Esra Küçükmorkoç
Affiliation:
Department of Radiation Oncology, Anadolu Medical Center, Gebze, Kocaeli, Turkey
Mehmet Doğu Canoğlu
Affiliation:
Department of Radiation Oncology, Anadolu Medical Center, Gebze, Kocaeli, Turkey
Nadir Küçük
Affiliation:
Department of Radiation Oncology, Anadolu Medical Center, Gebze, Kocaeli, Turkey
Hale Başak Çağlar
Affiliation:
Department of Radiation Oncology, Anadolu Medical Center, Gebze, Kocaeli, Turkey
*
Author for correspondence: Menekse Turna, Department of Radiation Oncology, Anadolu Medical Center, Gebze, Kocaeli, Turkey. E-mail: menekse.turna@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction:

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has become a preferred treatment in the initial management of brain metastases (BM). This study reported treatment outcomes and identified the patient, tumour, and treatment-related factors that predict failure, survival, and brain necrosis (BN).

Methods:

We retrospectively reviewed the electronic medical records of all BM patients treated with SRS. Patient, tumour characteristics and treatment details data were collected. All recurrences and BN were defined in the neurooncological tumour board.

Results:

From December 2016 to April 2020, 148 patients were analysed. The median follow-up was 14·8 months (range 6–51). At the time of analyses, 72·3% of the patients were alive. Presence of initial neurological deficit (HR; 2·71 (1·07–6·9); p = 0·036) and prior RT (HR; 2·55 (1·28–5·09); p = 0·008) is associated with worse overall survival. The local recurrence rate was 11·5 %. The distant brain metastasis rate was 53·4 %. Leptomeningeal metastasis was seen in 11 patients (7·4%). Symptomatic BN was seen in 19 patients (12·8 %). Bigger lesions (13 versus 23 mm diameter; p = 0·034) and cavity radiosurgery are associated with more BN (63·2 % versus 36·8%; p: 0·004).

Conclusions:

Distant BM is the leading cause of CNS recurrences and, salvage SRS is possible. Due to the increasing risk of developing BN routine metastasectomy should be made with caution.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Tsao, MN, Rades, D, Wirth, A et al. Radiotherapeutic and surgical management for newly diagnosed brain metastasis(es): an American society for radiation oncology evidence-based guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol 2012; 2(3):210225. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2011.12.004 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McDuff, SG, Taich, ZJ, Lawson, JD et al. Neurocognitive assessment following whole brain radiation therapy and radiosurgery for patients with cerebral metastases: table 1. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2013; 84(12): 13841391. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2013-305166 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linskey, ME, Andrews, DW, Asher, AL et al. The role of stereotactic radiosurgery in the management of patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases: a systematic review and evidence-based clinical practice guideline. J Neuro-Oncol 2009; 96(1): 4568. doi: 10.1007/s11060-009-0073-4 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Comprehensive Cancer Network – Home. NCCN. http://nccn.org/. Accessed on 29th May 2022.Google Scholar
Andrews, DW, Scott, CB, Sperduto, PW et al. Whole brain radiation therapy with or without stereotactic radiosurgery boost for patients with one to three brain metastases: phase III results of the RTOG 9508 randomised trial. Lancet 2004; 363(9422): 16651672. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(04)16250-8 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aoyama, H, Shirato, H, Tago, M et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery plus whole-brain radiation therapy vs stereotactic radiosurgery alone for treatment of brain metastases. J Am Med Assoc 2006; 295(21): 2483. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.21.2483 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chang, EL, Wefel, JS, Hess, KR et al. Neurocognition in patients with brain metastases treated with radiosurgery or radiosurgery plus whole-brain irradiation: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2009; 10(11): 10371044. doi: 10.1016/s1470-2045(09)70263-3 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schulz, R, Sherwood, PR Physical and mental health effects of family caregiving. J Social Work Educ 2008; 44(sup3): 105113. doi: 10.5175/jswe.2008.773247702 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamamoto, M, Serizawa, T, Shuto, T et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with multiple brain metastases (JLGK0901): a multi-institutional prospective observational study. Lancet Oncol 2014; 15(4): 387395. doi: 10.1016/s1470-2045(14)70061-0 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yamamoto, M, Kawabe, T, Sato, Y et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with multiple brain metastases: a case-matched study comparing treatment results for patients with 2–9 versus 10 or more tumors. J Neurosurg 2014; 121(Suppl_2): 1625. doi: 10.3171/2014.8.gks141421 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Routman, DM, Bian, SX, Diao, K et al. The growing importance of lesion volume as a prognostic factor in patients with multiple brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery. Cancer Med 2018; 7(3): 757764. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1352 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hatiboglu, MA, Akdur, K Evaluating critical brain radiation doses in the treatment of multiple brain lesions with gamma knife radiosurgery. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 2017; 95(4): 268278. doi: 10.1159/000478272 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stereotactic radiosurgery compared with hippocampal-avoidant whole brain radiotherapy (ha-WBRT) plus memantine for 5 or more brain metastases – full text view. Full Text View – ClinicalTrials.gov. https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03550391. Accessed 29th May 2022.Google Scholar
Redmond, KJ, De Salles, AAF, Fariselli, L et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery for postoperative metastatic surgical cavities: a critical review and International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society (ISRS) practice guidelines. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 111(1): 6880. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.04.016 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, PD, Ballman, KV, Cerhan, JH et al. Postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery compared with whole brain radiotherapy for resected metastatic brain disease (NCCTG N107C/CEC·3): a Multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2017; 18(8): 10491060. doi: 10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30441-2 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Churilla, TM, Ballman, KV, Brown, PD et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery with or without whole-brain radiation therapy for limited brain metastases: a secondary analysis of the North Central Cancer Treatment Group N0574 (alliance) randomized controlled trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2017; 99(5): 11731178. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.07.045 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soliman, H, Ruschin, M, Angelov, L et al. Consensus contouring guidelines for postoperative completely resected cavity stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2018; 100(2): 436442. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.09.047 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prabhu, RS, Patel, KR, Press, RH et al. Preoperative vs postoperative radiosurgery for resected brain metastases: a review. Neurosurgery 2018; 84(1): 1929. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyy146 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minniti, G, Clarke, E, Lanzetta, G et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases: analysis of outcome and risk of Brain Radionecrosis. Radiat Oncol 2011; 6(1). doi: 10.1186/1748-717x-6-48 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Milano, MT, Grimm, J, Niemierko, A et al. Single- and multifraction stereotactic radiosurgery dose/volume tolerances of the brain. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 110(1): 6886. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.08.013 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Atalar, B, Choi, CYH, Harsh, GR et al. Cavity volume dynamics after resection of brain metastases and timing of postresection cavity stereotactic radiosurgery. Neurosurgery 2013; 72(2): 180185. doi: 10.1227/neu.0b013e31827b99f3 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, MD, Avkshtol, V, Baschnagel, AM et al. Surgical resection of brain metastases and the risk of leptomeningeal recurrence in patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2016; 94(3): 537543. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.11.022 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prabhu, RS, Turner, BE, Asher, AL et al. Leptomeningeal disease and neurologic death after surgical resection and radiosurgery for brain metastases: a multi-institutional analysis. Adv Radiat Oncol 2021; 6(2): 100644. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2021.100644 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patel, KR, Burri, SH, Asher, AL et al. Comparing preoperative with postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery for resectable brain metastases. Neurosurgery 2016; 79(2): 279285. doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000001096 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khan, M, Arooj, S, Li, R et al. Tumor primary site and histology subtypes role in radiotherapeutic management of brain metastases. Front Oncol 2020; 10. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00781 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sayan, M, Zoto Mustafayev, T, Sahin, B et al. Evaluation of response to stereotactic radiosurgery in patients with radioresistant brain metastases. Radiat Oncol J 2019; 37(4): 265270. doi: 10.3857/roj.2019.00409 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Redmond, KJ, Gui, C, Benedict, S et al. Tumor control probability of radiosurgery and fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 110(1): 5367. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.10.034 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed