Skip to main content Accessibility help

The value of pre-application clinical department visits in radiotherapy: a qualitative evaluation

  • Pete Bridge (a1), Jenny Callender (a1), Jo Edgerley (a1) and Cath Gordon (a1)



The mandatory clinical radiotherapy department visit undertaken by potential applicants aims to provide understanding of the profession and therefore reduce attrition. Increasing pressure on clinical departments makes visits a logistical challenge. This additional step may also present as an unnecessary barrier to applicants. With no evidence relating to visits, this study aimed to explore the perceptions of both students and clinical educators concerning potential benefits and challenges.


A focus group interview method was used to gather in-depth qualitative data concerning the clinical department visit experiences from first-year undergraduate students and clinical educators.


Three themes emerged from the student focus groups: the perceived purpose of the clinical visit, the visit content and the outcomes and impact arising from the visit. Clinical educator data also followed these themes in addition to ‘logistical impact’ theme.


The clinical visit has value to applicants in affirming their decision to study radiotherapy. There is variation in expectation and content for these visits and they are logistically challenging. Nationally agreed guidelines for visit structure and content could improve visit efficiency and effectiveness. A national clinical visit form may reduce workload for educators and applicants.


Corresponding author

Author for correspondence: Pete Bridge, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK. Tel: +44 (0)151 795 8366. E-mail:


Hide All

Cite this article: Bridge P, Callender J, Edgerley J, Gordon C. (2019) The value of pre-application clinical department visits in radiotherapy: a qualitative evaluation. Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice18: 110–115. doi: 10.1017/S1460396918000717



Hide All
1. Cancer Research UK. 100 years of radiotherapy but public still in the dark over the treatment., 2011. Accessed on 13th November 2018.
2. Department of Health. Radiotherapy Services in England. London: Department of Health, 2012.
3. Society and College of Radiographers. Improving Student Retention: Guidelines and Good Practice. London: Society and College of Radiographers, 2009.
4. Colyer, H. Improving Retention of the Radiotherapy Workforce – The Role of Practice Placement in Student Attrition from Pre-registration Programmes in England: Executive Summary and Recommendations. London: Society and College of Radiographers, 2013.
5. Universities UK., 2017. Accessed on 13th November 2018.
6. Wright, C A, Schneider-Kolsky, M E, Jolly, B, Baird, M A. Using focus groups in radiation therapy research: ethical and practical considerations. J Radiother Pract 2012; 11 (4): 217228.
7. Graneheim, U H, Lundman, B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today 2004; 24 (2): 105112.
8. Medical Research Council. Good Research Practice; Principles and Guidelines. London: Medical Research Council, 2012.



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed