Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-54vk6 Total loading time: 0.31 Render date: 2022-08-12T02:00:45.897Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Dissonance and disengagement in pregnant smokers: a qualitative study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2013

Felix Naughton*
Affiliation:
Behavioural Science Group, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, CB2 0SR, UK
Helen Eborall
Affiliation:
SAPPHIRE (Social science APPlied to Healthcare Improvement REsearch) group, Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, LE1 6TP, UK
Stephen Sutton
Affiliation:
Behavioural Science Group, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, CB2 0SR, UK
*
Address for correspondence: Corresponding author: Felix Naughton, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Forvie Site, Cambridge, CB2 0SR, +44 (0)1223 769302, Fax +44 (0) 1223 762515, E-mail: fmen2@medschl.cam.ac.uk

Abstract

Introduction: While numerous barriers to smoking cessation in pregnancy have been identified, less is known about the role of pregnant smokers’ beliefs in promoting and inhibiting abstinence. This study explored these beliefs and how they might interact with psychosocial factors related to pregnancy and antenatal care.

Methods: In-depth face-to-face semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 women with experience of prenatal smoking. Grounded theory and the constant comparative approach guided the analysis towards a theoretical explanation of the women's experiences.

Results: Cognitive dissonance generated by the discrepancy between smoking-related prenatal harm beliefs and continued smoking was a strong motivator to quit. However, difficulty in quitting led many to resolve this dissonance by endorsing disengagement beliefs which downplayed the threat of smoking. Four main types of disengagement belief were identified. The tendency to endorse disengagement beliefs appeared to be influenced by two factors: uncertainty about how smoking caused foetal harm and reassurance from health professionals and others that reduced smoking was sufficient for harm minimisation.

Conclusions: Disengagement belief endorsement is common among pregnant smokers and enables the justification of continued smoking, potentially hindering efforts to quit. Increased promotion of complete abstinence by antenatal care professionals and health education interventions targeting risk comprehension and disengagement belief endorsement should be considered to promote greater efforts to quit among pregnant smokers.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abatemarco, D. J., Steinberg, M. B., & Delnevo, C. D. (2007). Midwives’ knowledge, perceptions, beliefs, and practice supports regarding tobacco dependence treatment. Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health, 52, 451457. doi:10.1016/j.jmwh.2007.03.019CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abrahamsson, A., Springett, J., Karlsson, L., & Ottosson, T. (2005). Making sense of the challenge of smoking cessation during pregnancy: a phenomenographic approach. Health Education Research, 20, 367378. doi:10.1093/her/cyg127CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arborelius, E., & Nyberg, K. (1997). How should midwives discuss smoking behaviour in pregnancy with women of low educational attainment? Midwifery, 13, 210215. doi:10.1016/S0266–6138(97)80008-3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191215. doi:10.1037//0033-295X.84.2.191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 364374. doi:10.1037//0033-295X.84.2.191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benowitz, N. L., Jacob, P., Kozlowski, L. T. III, & Yu, L. (1986). Influence of smoking fewer cigarettes on exposure to tar, nicotine, and carbon monoxide. New England Journal of Medicine, 315, 13101313. doi:10.1056/NEJM198611203152102CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bull, L. (2007). Smoking cessation intervention with pregnant women and new parents (part 2): A focus group study of health visitors and midwives working in the UK. Journal of Neonatal Nursing, 13, 179185. doi:10.1016/j.jnn.2007.07.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, S., Wong, W. L., & Smith, W. (1993). Self-exempting beliefs about smoking and health: differences between smokers and ex-smokers. American Journal of Public Health, 83, 215219. doi:10.2105/AJPH.83.2.215CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cnattingius, S. (2004). The epidemiology of smoking during pregnancy: smoking prevalence, maternal characteristics, and pregnancy outcomes. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 6 Suppl 2, S125S140. doi:10.1080/14622200410001669187CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coleman, T., Cooper, S., Thornton, J. G., Grainge, M. J., Watts, K., Britton, J.et al. (2012). A randomized trial of nicotine-replacement therapy patches in pregnancy. New England Journal of Medicine, 366, 808818. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1109582CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooke, M., Mattick, R. P., & Barclay, L. (1996). Predictors of brief smoking intervention in a midwifery setting. Addiction, 91, 17151725. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.1996.tb02274.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curry, S. J., McBride, C., Grothaus, L., Lando, H., & Pirie, P. (2001). Motivation for smoking cessation among pregnant women. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 15, 126132. doi:10.1037//0893-164X.15.2.126CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davison, C., Frankel, S., & Smith, G. D. (1992). The limits of lifestyle: re-assessing ‘fatalism’ in the popular culture of illness prevention. Social Science & Medicine, 34, 675685. doi:10.1016/0277-9536(92)90195-VCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dijkstra, A., & Brosschot, J. (2003). Worry about health in smoking behaviour change. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 41, 10811092. doi:10.1016/S0005–7967(02)00244-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dijkstra, A., De Vries, H., Kok, G., & Rouackers, J. (1999). Self-evaluation and motivation to change: social cognitive constructs in smoking cessation. Psychology & Health, 14, 747759. doi:10.1080/08870449908410762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Festinger, L. (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Glover, M., Paynter, J., Bullen, C., & Kristensen, K. (2008). Supporting pregnant women to quit smoking: postal survey of New Zealand general practitioners and midwives’ smoking cessation knowledge and practices. New Zealand Medical Journal, 121, 5365.Google ScholarPubMed
Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999). Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist, 54, 493503. doi:10.1037//0003-066X.54.7.493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, H. (1976). Smoking in pregnancy: the attitudes of expectant mothers. Social Science & Medicine, 10, 399405. doi:10.1016/0037-7856(76)90097-4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hall, S., Weinman, J., & Marteau, T. M. (2004). The motivating impact of informing women smokers of a link between smoking and cervical cancer: the role of coherence. Health Psychology, 23, 419424. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.23.4.419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haslam, C., & Draper, E. (2001). A qualitative study of smoking during pregnancy. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 6, 9599. doi:10.1080/713690228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heikkinen, H., Patja, K., & Jallinoja, P. (2010). Smokers’ accounts on the health risks of smoking: why is smoking not dangerous for me? Social Science & Medicine, 71, 877883. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.05.036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hettema, J. E., & Hendricks, P. S. (2010). Motivational interviewing for smoking cessation: a meta-analytic review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 78, 868884.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hotham, E. D., Atkinson, E. R., & Gilbert, A. L. (2002). Focus groups with pregnant smokers: barriers to cessation, attitudes to nicotine patch use and perceptions of cessation counselling by care providers. Drug and Alcohol Review, 21, 163168. doi:10.1080/09595230220139064CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kleinjan, M., van den Eijnden, R. J., Dijkstra, A., Brug, J., & Engels, R. C. (2006). Excuses to continue smoking: The role of disengagement beliefs in smoking cessation. Addictive Behaviors, 31, 22232237. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2006.02.012CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lendahls, L., Ohman, L., Liljestrand, J., & Hakansson, A. (2002). Women's experiences of smoking during and after pregnancy as ascertained two to three years after birth. Midwifery, 18, 214222. doi:10.1054/midw.2002.0312CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lu, Y., Tong, S., & Oldenburg, B. (2001). Determinants of smoking and cessation during and after pregnancy. Health Promotion International, 16, 355365. doi:10.1093/heapro/16.4.355CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mays, N., & Pope, C. (2006). Quality in qualitative health research. In Pope, C. & Mays, N. (Eds.), Qualitative Research in Health Care (pp. 82101). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. doi:10.1002/9780470750841.ch8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michie, S., Churchill, S., & West, R. (2011). Identifying evidence-based competences required to deliver behavioural support for smoking cessation. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 41, 5970. doi:10.1007/s12160-010-9235-zCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, W. R. & Rollnick, S. (1991). Motivational Interviewing: Preparing People for Change. New York: Guildford Press.Google Scholar
National Institute for Clinical Excellence (2010). Quitting smoking in pregnancy and following childbirth, NICE public health guidance 26.Google Scholar
Naughton, F., Prevost, A. T., Gilbert, H., & Sutton, S. (2012). Randomised controlled trial evaluation of a tailored leaflet and SMS text message self-help intervention for pregnant smokers (MiQuit). Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 14, 569577. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntr254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oakes, W., Chapman, S., Borland, R., Balmford, J., & Trotter, L. (2004). ‘Bulletproof skeptics in life's jungle’: which self-exempting beliefs about smoking most predict lack of progression towards quitting? Preventive Medicine, 39, 776782. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.03.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, L., McNeill, A., & Callum, C. (1998). Trends in smoking during pregnancy in England, 1992–7: quota sampling surveys. BMJ, 317, 728. doi:10.1136/bmj.317.7160.728CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Owen, L., & Penn, G. (1999). Smoking and Pregnancy: A Survey of Knowledge, Attitudes and Behaviour 1992–1999 Health Education Authority.Google Scholar
Petersen, Z., Nilsson, M., Everett, K., & Emmelin, M. (2007). Possibilities for transparency and trust in the communication between midwives and pregnant women: the case of smoking. Midwifery, 25, 382391.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schneider, S., Huy, C., Schutz, J., & Diehl, K. (2010). Smoking cessation during pregnancy: a systematic literature review. Drug and Alcohol Review, 29, 8190. doi:10.1111/j.1465-3362.2009.00098.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silverman, D. (1989). Six rules of qualitative research: a post-romantic argument. Symbolic Interaction, 12, 215230. doi:10.1525/si.1989.12.2.215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. (2nd ed.) London: Sage.Google Scholar
Sutton, S. (1999). How accurate are smokers’ perceptions of risk? Health, Risk and Society, 1, 223230. doi:10.1080/13698579908407020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thyrian, J. R., Hannover, W., Roske, K., Scherbarth, S., Hapke, U., & John, U. (2006). Midwives’ attitudes to counselling women about their smoking behaviour during pregnancy and postpartum. Midwifery, 22, 3239. doi:10.1016/j.midw.2005.04.003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tod, A. M. (2003). Barriers to smoking cessation in pregnancy: a qualitative study. British Journal of Community Nursing, 8, 5664.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ussher, M., Etter, J. F., & West, R. (2006). Perceived barriers to and benefits of attending a stop smoking course during pregnancy. Patient Education and Counseling, 61, 467472. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2005.06.021CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ussher, M., West, R., & Hibbs, N. (2004). A survey of pregnant smokers’ interest in different types of smoking cessation support. Patient Education and Counseling, 54, 6772. doi:10.1016/S0738-3991(03)00197-6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Dissonance and disengagement in pregnant smokers: a qualitative study
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Dissonance and disengagement in pregnant smokers: a qualitative study
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Dissonance and disengagement in pregnant smokers: a qualitative study
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *