Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-684899dbb8-489z4 Total loading time: 0.328 Render date: 2022-05-18T13:16:40.986Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

Choice and Welfare Reform: Lone Parents’ Decision Making around Paid Work and Family Life

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 February 2011

ANTHONY RAFFERTY*
Affiliation:
European Work and Employment Research Centre (EWERC), Manchester Business School, Manchester M15 6PB
JAY WIGGAN
Affiliation:
School of Sociology, Social Policy and Social Work, Queen's University, Belfast BT7 1NN email: j.wiggan@qub.ac.uk

Abstract

Welfare-to-work policy in the UK sees ‘choice’ regarding lone parents’ employment decisions increasingly defined in terms of powers of selection between options within active labour market programmes, with constraints on the option of non-market activity progressively tightened. In this paper, we examine the wider choice agenda in public services in relation to lone-parent employment, focusing on the period following the 2007 Freud Review of welfare provision. (Freud, 2007) Survey data are used to estimate the extent to which recent policies promoting compulsory job search by youngest dependent child age map onto lone parents' own stated decision-making regarding if and when to enter the labour market. The findings indicate a substantial proportion of lone parents targeted by policy reform currently do not want a job and that their main reported reason is that they are looking after their children. Economically inactive lone mothers also remain more likely to have other chronic employment barriers, which traverse dependent child age categories. Some problems, such as poor health, sickness or disability, are particularly acute among those with older dependent children who are the target of recent activation policy.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bell, A., Finch, N., La Velle, I., Sainsbury, R. and Skinner, C. (2005), A Question of Balance: Lone Parents, Childcare and Work, Department for Work and Pensions Research Report No. 230, Leeds: HSMO Corporate Document Services.Google Scholar
Benzeval, M. (1998), ‘The self reported health status of lone parents’, Social Science and Medicine, 46: 10, 1337–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blair, T. (2002), Speech by the Prime Minister on Welfare Reform – Jobcentre Plus, Streatham, 10 June, http://www.number10.gov.uk/Page1716, downloaded 20/02/09.Google Scholar
Brown, G. (2007), Presentation by the Chancellor of the Exchequer at the Public Service Reform Conference, 21st Century Public Services – Learning from front line, 27 March, http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/speech_chex_270307.htm, downloaded 19/02/09.Google Scholar
Burchardt, T. and Le Grand, J. (2002), Constraint and Opportunity: Identifying Voluntary Non-Employment, CASE Working Paper No. 55, London: LSE.Google Scholar
Clarke, J. (2005), ‘New Labour's citizen's: activated, empowered, responsibilized, abandoned?’, Critical Social Policy, 25: 4, 447–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, J.Newman, J. and Westmarland, L. (2007), ‘The antagonisms of choice: New Labour and the reform of public services’, Social Policy and Society, 7: 2, 245–53.Google Scholar
Convery, P. (2009), ‘Welfare to work: from special measures to 80 percent employment’, Local Economy, 24: 1, 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crompton, R. (1998), ‘Explaining women's employment patterns’, British Journal of Sociology, 49: 1, 118–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dale, A., Lindley, J., Dex, S. and Rafferty, A. (2008), ‘Ethnic differences in women's labour market activity’, in Scott, J. et al. (eds.), Women and Employment: Changing Lives and New Challenges, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 81109.Google Scholar
Dean, H. (2007), ‘Tipping the balance: the problematic nature of work–life balance in a low income neighbourhood’, Journal of Social Policy, 36: 4, 519–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) (2006), A New Deal for Welfare: Empowering People to Work, Cm 6730, Leeds: Corporate Document Services, http://www.dwp.gov.uk/docs/a-new-deal-for-welfare-empowering-people-to-work-full-document.pdf, downloaded 05/02/10.Google Scholar
Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) (2007), In Work, Better Off: Next Steps to Full Employment, CM 7130, Department for Work and Pensions, HMSO, http://www.dwp.gov.uk/docs/in-work-better-off.pdf, downloaded 25/01/11.Google Scholar
Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) (2008a), No One Written Off: Reforming Welfare to Reward Responsibility, Cm 7363, Leeds: Corporate Document Services, http://www.dwp.gov.uk/welfarereform/noonewrittenoff/noonewrittenoff-complete.pdf, downloaded 29/07/09.Google Scholar
Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) (2008b), Raising Expectations and Increasing Support: Reforming Welfare for the Future, Cm 7506, Leeds: Corporate Document Services, http://www.dwp.gov.uk/welfarereform/raisingexpectations/fullversion.pdf, downloaded 29/07/09.Google Scholar
Duncan, S. and Edwards, R. (1999), Lone Mothers, Paid-work and Gendered Moral Rationalities, Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, S. and Irwin, S. (2004), ‘The social patterning of values and rationalities: mothers’ choices in combining caring and employment’, Social Policy and Society, 3: 4, 391–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan-Smith, I. (2010), ‘Welfare for the 21st century’, speech by the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, Thursday 27 May, http://www.dwp.gov.uk/newsroom/press-releases/2010/may-2010/dwp070-10-270510.shtml, downloaded 04/10/10.Google Scholar
Dwyer, P. (2004), ‘Creeping conditionality in the UK: from welfare rights to conditional entitlements?’, Canadian Journal of Sociology, 29: 2, 266–87.Google Scholar
Dwyer, P. (2008), ‘The conditional welfare state’, in Powell, M. (ed.), Modernising the Welfare State: The Blair legacy, Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, R., Duncan, S., Reynolds, T. and Alldred, P. (2002), ‘A mother's instinct? Paid work, partnering and childcare’, Working Paper 26, Centre for Research on Family, Kinship and Childhood, University of Leeds.Google Scholar
Fagan, C. (2001), ‘Time, money and the gender order: work orientations and working-time preferences in Britain’, Gender, Work and Organization, 8: 3, 239–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finn, D. (2009), ‘The welfare market and Flexible New Deal: lessons from other countries’, Local Economy, 24: 1, 3845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, R. (1996), Childcare in the Balance: How Lone Parents Make Decisions About Work, London: Policy Studies Institute.Google Scholar
Freud, D. (2007), Reducing Dependency, Increasing Opportunity: Options for the Future of Welfare to Work, Department for Work and Pensions, Leeds: Corporate Document Services, http://www.dwp.gov.uk/docs/welfarereview.pdf, downloaded 06/10/10.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (2002), Where Now for New Labour? Oxford: Fabian Society/Policy Network and Polity Press.Google Scholar
Grayling, C. (2010), ‘The Work Programme’, speech by the Minister for Employment to the Centre for Economic and Social Inclusion, Welfare to Work Event, Thursday 1 July, http://www.dwp.gov.uk/newsroom/ministers-speeches/2010/01-07-10.shtml, downloaded 04/10/10.Google Scholar
Greener, I. (2007), ‘Choice and voice – a review’, Social Policy and Society, 7: 2, 255–65.Google Scholar
Greener, I. (2008), ‘The stages of New Labour’, in Powell, M. (ed.), Modernising the Welfare State: The Blair Legacy, Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
Gregg, P. (2008), Realising Potential: A Vision for Personalised Conditionality and Support, An Independent Review to the Department for Work and Pensions, http://www.dwp.gov.uk/welfarereform/realisingpotential.pdf, downloaded 29/07/09.Google Scholar
Grover, C. (2005), ‘The National Childcare Strategy: the social regulation of lone mothers as a gendered reserve army of labour’, Capital and Class, 85: 6390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grover, C. (2007), ‘The Freud Report on the future of welfare to work: some critical reflections’, Critical Social Policy, 27: 4, 534–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grover, C. and Piggott, L. (2007), ‘Social security, employment and Incapacity Benefit: critical reflections on A New Deal for Welfare’, Disability and Society, 22: 7, 733–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grover, C. and Stewart, S. (2002), The Work Connection – The Role of Social Security in British Economic Regulation, Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Hakim, C. (2000), Work Life Style Choices in the Twenty First Century: Preference Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hakim, C. (2004), Key Issues in Women's Work: Female Diversity and the Polarisation of Women's Employment, London: Glass House Press.Google Scholar
Treasury, HM (2008), Improving Delivery and Choice: Modernising Britain's Tax and Benefits System Number Twelve, a discussion paper, http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/tax_workwel_index.htm, downloaded 29/07/09.Google Scholar
Treasury, HM (2010), Budget 2010, HC 61, http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/junebudget_easyread.htm, downloaded 04/10/10.Google Scholar
Holtermann, S., Brannen, J., Moss, P. and Owen, C. (1999), Lone Parents and the Labour Market: Results from the 1997 Labour Force Survey and Review of Research, Employment Services Research Report No. 23, London: HSMO.Google Scholar
Hoxhallari, L.Connolly, A. and Lyon, N. (2007), Families with Children in Britain: Findings from the 2005 Families and Children Study (FACS), DWP Research Report No. 424, Leeds: Corporate Documents Services.Google Scholar
Johnson, A. (2002), Job Retention and Advancement in Employment: Review of Research Evidence, Department for Work and Pensions In House Research Report No. 98, London: HSMO.Google Scholar
Knijn, T., Martin, C. and Millar, J. (2007), ‘Activation as a common framework for social policies towards lone parents’, Social Policy and Administration, 41: 6, 638–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, J. (2003), ‘Developing early years childcare in England, 1997–2002: the choices for (working) mothers’, Social Policy and Administration, 37: 3, 219–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCrae, S. (2003a), ‘Constraints and choices in mothers’ employment careers: a consideration of Hakim's Preference Theory’, British Journal of Sociology, 54: 4, 317–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCrae, S. (2003b), ‘Choice and constraints in mothers’ employment careers: McCrae replies to Hakim’, British Journal of Sociology, 54: 4, 585–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKay, S. and Atkinson, A. (2007), Disability and Caring among Families with Children: Family Employment and Poverty Characteristics, Department for Work and Pensions Research Report No. 460, London: Corporate Documents Services.Google Scholar
Millar, J. (2006), ‘Better off in work? Work, security and welfare for lone mothers’, in Glendinning, C. and Kemp, P. A. (eds.), Cash and Care: Policy Challenges in the Welfare State, Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Millar, J. and Ridge, T. (2008), ‘Relationships of care: working lone mothers, their children and employment sustainability’, Journal of Social Policy, 38: 1, 103–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Needham, C. (2008), ‘Choice in public services: no choice but to choose!’, in Powell, M. (ed.), Modernising the Welfare State: The Blair Legacy, Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
Purnell, J. (2008), Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, speech at the Centre for Economic and Social Inclusion Conference, Birmingham, 25 June, http://www.dwp.gov.uk/aboutus/2008/25-06-08jp.asp, downloaded 29/07/09.Google Scholar
Rafferty, A. L. and Wiggan, J. (2008), Supporting Lone Parents into Work: Examining the Role of Private Recruitment Agencies, London: Recruitment and Employment Confederation Industry Research Unit/Adecco Institute.Google Scholar
Rowlingson, K. and McKay, S. (2005), ‘Lone motherhood and socio-economic disadvantage: insights from quantitative and qualitative evidence’, Sociological Review, 53: 1, 3049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. (1997), ‘Inequality, unemployment and contemporary Europe’, International Labour Review, 136: 2, 165–72.Google Scholar
Welfare Reform Act (2007), (C.5) London: The Stationery Office, http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2007/pdf/ukpga_20070005_en.pdf, downloaded 05/02/10.Google Scholar
Welfare Reform Act (2009), London: The Stationery Office, http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2009/pdf/ukpga_20090024_en.pdf, downloaded 10/02/10.Google Scholar
Wilcox, P. (2000), ‘Lone motherhood: the impact on living standards of leaving a violent relationship’, Social Policy and Administration, 34: 2, 176–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, F. (2001), ‘In and beyond New Labour: towards a new political ethics of care’, Critical Social Policy, 21: 4, 467–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Choice and Welfare Reform: Lone Parents’ Decision Making around Paid Work and Family Life
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Choice and Welfare Reform: Lone Parents’ Decision Making around Paid Work and Family Life
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Choice and Welfare Reform: Lone Parents’ Decision Making around Paid Work and Family Life
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *