Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-5zjcf Total loading time: 0.321 Render date: 2022-08-08T19:47:51.401Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Political Parties and Social Policy Responses to Global Economic Crises: Constrained Partisanship in Mature Welfare States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2014

PETER STARKE
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science and Public Management, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark email: starke@sam.sdu.dk
ALEXANDRA KAASCH
Affiliation:
Collaborative Research Centre 597 ‘Transformations of the State’, University of Bremen, Germany
FRANCA VAN HOOREN
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science and Public Administration, VU University Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Abstract

Based on empirical findings from a comparative study on welfare state responses to the four major economic shocks (the 1970s oil shocks, the early 1990s recession, the 2008 financial crisis) in four OECD countries, this article demonstrates that, in contrast to conventional wisdom, policy responses to global economic crises vary significantly across countries. What explains the cross-national and within-case variation in responses to crises? We discuss several potential causes of this pattern and argue that political parties and the party composition of governments can play a key role in shaping crisis responses, albeit in ways that go beyond traditional partisan theory. We show that the partisan conflict and the impact of parties are conditioned by existing welfare state configurations. In less generous welfare states, the party composition of governments plays a decisive role in shaping the direction of social policy change. By contrast, in more generous welfare states, i.e., those with highly developed automatic stabilisers, the overall direction of policy change is regularly not subject to debate. Political conflict in these welfare states rather concerns the extent to which expansion or retrenchment is necessary. Therefore, a clear-cut partisan impact can often not be shown.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, T. (2011), ‘Making your own luck – how to keep Australia out of the next recession’, speech at the Sydney Institute, 21 November 2011, http://www.liberal.org.au/Latest-News/2011/11/21/Making-your-own-luck.aspx.Google Scholar
Ahrend, R., Arnold, J. and Moeser, C. (2011), The Sharing of Macroeconomic Risk: Who Loses (and Gains) from Macroeconomic Shocks, OECD Economics Department Working Paper No. 877, Paris: OECD Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allan, J. P. and Scruggs, L. (2004), ‘Political partisanship and welfare state reform in advanced industrial societies’, American Journal of Political Science, 48: 3, 496512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armingeon, K. (2012), ‘The politics of fiscal responses to the crisis of 2008–2009’, Governance, 25: 4, 543–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armingeon, K. (2013), ‘Breaking with the past? Why the global financial crisis led to austerity policies but not to modernization of the welfare state’, in Pierson, C., Castles, F. G. and Naumann, I. K. (eds.), The Welfare State Reader, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, A. (2008), ‘Process tracing: a Bayesian perspective’, in Box-Steffensmeier, J. M., Brady, H. E. and Collier, D. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bermeo, N. and Pontusson, J. (2012), ‘Coping with crisis: an introduction’, in Bermeo, N. and Pontusson, J. (eds.), Coping with Crisis: Government Reactions to the Great Recession, New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Blais, A., Kim, J. and Foucault, M. (2010), ‘Public spending, public deficits and government coalitions’, Political Studies, 58: 5, 829–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castles, F. G. (ed.) (1982), The Impact of Parties: Politics and Policies in Democratic Capitalist States, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Castles, F. G. (1985), The Working Class and Welfare: Reflections on the Political Development of the Welfare State in Australia and New Zealand, 1890–1980, Sydney: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Castles, F. G. (1989), ‘Social protection by other means: Australia's strategy of coping with external vulnerability’, in Castles, F. G. (ed.), The Comparative History of Public Policy, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, D. and Follette, G. (2000), ‘The automatic fiscal stabilizers: quietly doing their thing’, FRBNY Economic Policy Review, 6: 1, 3568.Google Scholar
CPB (2010), Keuzes in kaart 2011–2015: Effecten van negen verkiezingsprogramma's op economie en milieu, Den Haag: Centraal Planbureau.Google Scholar
Cusack, T. R., Iversen, T. and Rehm, P. (2008), ‘Economic shocks, inequality, and popular support for redistribution’, in Beramendi, P. and Anderson, C. J. (eds.), Democracy, Inequality, and Representation, New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Darby, J. and Melitz, J. (2008), ‘Social spending and automatic stabilizers in the OECD’, Economic Policy 23: 56, 715–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolls, M., Fuest, C. and Peichl, A. (2010), ‘Automatic stabilizers and economic crisis: US vs Europe’, NBER Working Paper No. 16275, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolls, M., Fuest, C. and Peichl, A. (2012), ‘Automatic stabilizers and economic crisis: US vs. Europe’, Journal of Public Economics, 96: 3–4, 279–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farnsworth, K. and Irving, Z. (2012), ‘Varieties of crisis, varieties of austerity: social policy in challenging times’, Journal of Poverty and Social Justice 20: 2, 133–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, A. L. and Bennett, A. (2005), Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Giger, N. and Nelson, M. (2011), ‘The electoral consequences of welfare state retrenchment: blame avoidance or credit claiming in the era of permanent austerity?’, European Journal of Political Research, 50: 1, 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Girouard, N. and André, C. (2005), Measuring Cyclically-Adjusted Budget Balances for OECD Countries, Paris: OECD.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gourevitch, P. A. (1986), Politics in Hard Times: Comparative Responses to International Economic Crises, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Green-Pedersen, C. (2001), ‘Welfare state retrenchment in Denmark and the Netherlands, 1982–1998: the role of party competition and party consensus’, Comparative Political Studies, 34: 9, 963–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Häusermann, S., Picot, G. and Geering, D. (2013), ‘Rethinking party politics and the welfare state – recent advances in the literature’, British Journal of Political Science, 43: 1, 221–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, A. (1999), Social Democracy and Welfare Capitalism: A Century of Income Security Politics, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hinrichs, K. and Kangas, O. (2003), ‘When is a change big enough to be a system shift? Small system-shifting changes in German and Finnish pension policies’, Social Policy and Administration, 37: 6, 573–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holsteyn, J. J. M. (2010), ‘The Dutch parliamentary election of 2010’, West European Politics, 34: 2, 412–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, E. and Stephens, J. D. (2001), Development and Crisis of the Welfare State: Parties and Policies in Global Markets, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
in't Veld, J., Larch, M. and Vandeweyer, M. (2013), ‘Automatic fiscal stabilisers: what they are and what they do’, Open Economies Review, 24: 1, 147–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, C. (2011), ‘Labour market- versus life course-related social policies: understanding cross-programme differences’, Journal of European Public Policy, 19: 2, 275–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, C. and Mortensen, P. B. (2014), ‘Government responses to fiscal austerity: the effect of institutional fragmentation and partisanship’, Comparative Political Studies, 47: 2, 143–70.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, P. J. (1985), Small States in World Markets: Industrial Policy in Europe, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, H. (2001), ‘Partisan competition and welfare state retrenchment: when do politicians choose unpopular policies?’, in Pierson, P. (ed.), The New Politics of the Welfare State, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kittel, B. and Obinger, H. (2003), ‘Political parties, institutions, and the dynamics of social expenditure in times of austerity’, Journal of European Public Policy, 10: 1, 2045.Google Scholar
Klitgaard, M. B. and Elmelund-Præstekær, C. (2013), ‘Partisan effects on welfare state retrenchment: empirical evidence from a measurement of government intentions’, Social Policy and Administration, 47: 1, 5071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korpi, W. (1983), The Democratic Class Struggle, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Korpi, W. and Palme, J. (2003), ‘New politics and class politics in the context of austerity and globalization: welfare state regress in 18 countries, 1975–95’, American Political Science Review, 97: 3, 425–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindbom, A. (2001), ‘Dismantling the social democratic welfare model? Has the Swedish welfare state lost its defining characteristics?’, Scandinavian Political Studies, 24: 3, 171–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindvall, J. (2012), ‘Politics and policies in two economic crises: the Nordic countries’, in Bermeo, N. and Pontusson, J. (eds.), Coping with Crisis: Government Reactions to the Great Recession, New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Lipsmeyer, C. S. (2011), ‘Booms and busts: how parliamentary governments and economic context influence welfare policy’, International Studies Quarterly, 55: 4, 959–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarty, N. (2012), ‘The politics of the pop: the US response to the financial crisis and the great recession’, in Bermeo, N. and Pontusson, J. (eds.), Coping with Crisis: Government Reactions to the Great Recession, New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Mueller, J. E. (1970), ‘Presidential popularity from Truman to Johnson’, American Political Science Review, 64: 1, 1834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD (2009), OECD Economic Outlook, Interim Report March 2009, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
OECD (2012), Economic Outlook No 91 – June 2012 – Annual Projections for OECD Countries, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
OECD (2013), OECD Social Expenditure Database (SOCX), Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Oneal, J. R. and Bryan, A. L. (1995), ‘The rally ‘round the flag effect in US foreign policy crises, 1950–1985’, Political Behavior, 17: 4, 379401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, P. (1994), Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher, and the Politics of Retrenchment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudd, K. and Swan, W. (2008), Joint Press Conference Prime Minister and Treasurer, 14 October 2008 (Transcript), Australian Treasury, http://www.treasurer.gov.au/DisplayDocs.aspx?doc=transcripts/2008/143.htm&pageID=004&min=wms&Year=&DocType=.Google Scholar
Scharpf, F. W. (1991), Crisis and Choice in European Social Democracy, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Scruggs, L. (2006), Comparative Welfare State Entitlement Dataset, Version 1.2, Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
Scruggs, L. (2008), ‘Social rights, welfare generosity, and inequality’, in Beramendi, P. and Anderson, C. J. (eds.), Democracy, Inequality, and Representation: A Comparative Perspective, New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Singer, M. M. (2011), ‘Who says “it's the economy”? Cross-national and cross-individual variation in the salience of economic performance’, Comparative Political Studies, 44: 3, 284312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starke, P. (2006), ‘The politics of welfare state retrenchment: a literature review’, Social Policy and Administration, 40: 1, 104–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starke, P., Kaasch, A. and van Hooren, F. (2013), The Welfare State as a Crisis Manager: Explaining the Diversity of Policy Responses to Economic Crisis, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinmo, S. (2002), ‘Globalization and taxation: challenges to the Swedish welfare state’, Comparative Political Studies, 35: 7, 839–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephens, J. D. (1979), The Transition from Capitalism to Socialism, London/Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephens, J. D. (2010), ‘The social rights of citizenship’, in Castles, F. G., Leibfried, S., Lewis, J., Obinger, H. and Pierson, C. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Welfare State, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Swank, D. (2002), Global Capital, Political Institutions, and Policy Change in Developed Welfare States, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘t Hart, P., Rosenthal, U. and Kouzmin, A. (1993), ‘Crisis decision making’, Administration and Society, 25: 1, 1245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor-Gooby, P. and Stoker, G. (2011), ‘The coalition programme: a new vision for Britain or politics as usual?’, The Political Quarterly, 82: 1, 415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsebelis, G. (2002), Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turnbull, M. (2009), Response to the Government's $42 Billion Expenditure Package,Google Scholar
van Kersbergen, K. (1995), Social Capitalism: A Study of Christian Democracy and the Welfare State, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vis, B., van Kersbergen, K. and Hylands, T. (2011), ‘To what extent did the financial crisis intensify the pressure to reform the welfare state?’, Social Policy and Administration, 45: 4, 338–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagschal, U. and Jäkel, T. (2010), ‘Öffentliche Finanzen im Stresstest – Policy-Reaktionen auf die Finanz- und Wirtschaftskrise’, der moderne staat, 3: 2, 295320.Google Scholar
Weir, M. and Skocpol, T. (1985), ‘State structures and the possibilities for “keynesian” responses to the Great Depression in Sweden, Britain, and the United States’, in Evans, P. B., Rueschemeyer, D. and Theda, Skocpol. (eds.), Bringing the State Back In, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Starke Supplementary Material

Appendix

Download Starke Supplementary Material(File)
File 156 KB
28
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Political Parties and Social Policy Responses to Global Economic Crises: Constrained Partisanship in Mature Welfare States
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Political Parties and Social Policy Responses to Global Economic Crises: Constrained Partisanship in Mature Welfare States
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Political Parties and Social Policy Responses to Global Economic Crises: Constrained Partisanship in Mature Welfare States
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *