Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Analysis of Anti-Domestic Violence Policy Implementation in Georgia Using Contextual Interaction Theory (CIT)

  • NINO JAVAKHISHVILI (a1) and GVANTSA JIBLADZE (a2)

Abstract

This study examines the development of anti-domestic-violence policy implementation in an emerging democracy, the country of Georgia. We applied a public policy framework – Contextual Interaction Theory (CIT) – which enabled us to thoroughly examine factors contributing to drawbacks in anti-domestic-violence policy implementation. The CIT framework was enriched by expanding it to the scale of the national anti-domestic-violence policy and placing greater emphasis on the victim. The qualitative analysis of in-depth interviews and media reveals that public policy implementers lack motivation, information and power to be able to really implement the anti-domestic-violence policy. The CIT analysis of domestic violence (DV) policies demonstrates that DV problems are further exacerbated by the contextual factors of societal attitudes in terms of gender inequality and social acceptance of DV, which creates unfavorable context for the realisation of the anti-DV policy. In such circumstances, according to the CIT, only symbolic realisation of a policy takes place. The use of CIT as a tool for the implementation of a policy will provide substantial input into its realisation. Based on this theory, it is crucial to increase information, motivation and power of implementers, as well as change the context for the anti-DV policy to be actually implemented.

Copyright

References

Hide All
de Boer, C. (2012), Contextual Water Management a Study Of Governance and Implementation Processes in Local Stream Restoration Projects, Ph.D Diss., University of Twente.
Bressers, H. (2004), Implementing sustainable development: how to know what works, where, when and how, in Lafferty, William M. (ed.), Governance for sustainable development: The challenge of adapting form to function, Cheltenham, Northampton MA: Edward Elgar.
Chabukiani, N., Jibladze, G. and Ubilava, N. (2014), The Anti-Domestic Violence Policy Analysis, Tbilisi: WFG.
Chitashvili, M. and Arutiunov, L. (2010), Coping with Domestic Violence against Women, in National Research on Domestic Violence against Women in Georgia, Tbilisi: UNFPA.
Council of Europe. (2011), Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence, CETS No. 210.
Domestic Abuse International Programs (2011), ‘What is the Duluth Model?’ http://www.theduluthmodel.org/ (Accessed 5th may 2016).
International Republican Institute (IRI). (2015), ‘Public Opinion Survey Residents of Georgia’ http://www.iri.org/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/iri_georgia_public_2015_final_0.pdf
Javakhishvili, N. (2010a), Prevalence of Domestic Violence in Georgia, in National Research on Domestic Violence against Women in Georgia, Tbilisi: UNFPA.
Javakhishvili, N. (2010b), ‘Media Representation of Combating Domestic Violence in Georgia’, Tbilisi, Proceedings from the 1st CSS conference: Georgia in Modern World Tbilisi.
Javakhishvili, N., Lortkipanidze, M. and Petriashvili, A. (2012a), ‘The Role of Social Capital in Combating Domestic Violence’, Proceedings from the 10th Global Conference, Violence Probing the Boundaries, Prague, May 13–15.
Javakhishvili, N., Lortkipanidze, M. and Petriashvili, A. (2012b), ‘Social Capital in Combating Domestic Violence: Church, Mass Media, and Local Community’ Proceedings from the 4th CSS conference, Annual Conference on Gender Studies, Tbilisi, Georgia.
Javakhishvili, N. and Tsuladze, L. (2011a), ‘Implementing Domestic Violence Policy in Georgia: Impediments and their causes’, Proceedings from 6th ECPR General Conference, Reykjavik, August , 2011.
Javakhishvili, N. and Tsuladze, L. (2011b), Interagency United Efforts to Combat Domestic Violence in Georgia: Local or International Agenda? Report for the Academic Swiss Caucasus Net (ASCN).
Johnson, J., Kulmala, M. and Jäppinen, M. (2016), ’Street-level Practice of Russia's Social Policy making in Saint Petersburg: Federalism, Informal Politics, and Domestic Violence’, Journal of Social Policy, 45, 02, 287304.
Kobalia, M. (2011), The Representation of Women in the Orthodox Church in Georgia, Master‘s Thesis, Tbilisi State University.
Krizsan, A. and Popa, R. M. (2010), ‘Frames in Contestation: International Human RightsNorms and Domestic Violence Policy Debates in Five Countries of Central and Eastern Europe’, Proceedings from the European Conference on Politics and Gender, Budapest, January 13–15.
MAGEEQ (Multiple Meanings of Gender Equality). http://www.mageeq.net/ (Accessed 5th May 2016).
Natesan, S. D. and Marathe, R. R. (2015), ‘Literature Review of Public Policy Implementation’, Journal of Public Policy, 11, 219241.
Owens, K. (2008), Understanding How Actors Influence Policy Implementation: A Comparative Study of Wetland Restorations in New Jersey, Oregon, The Netherlands and Finland, PH Diss., University of Twente.
Paudel, N. R. (2009), ‘A Critical Account of Policy Implementation Theories: Status and Reconsideration’, Nepalese Journal of Public Policy and Governance, 25, 2, 3654.
QUING (Quality in Gender+ Equality Policies). http://www.quing.eu/ (Accessed 5th May 2016).
Sabedashvili, T. (2011), The Identification and Regulation of Domestic Violence in Georgia (1991-2006), PH Diss., Central European University.
Spratt, K. (2009), Policy Implementation Barriers Analysis: Conceptual Framework and Pilot Test in Three Countries, Washington, DC: Futures Group, Health Policy Initiative.
Sumbadze, N. (2014), Study of the Perceptions and Attitudes towards Violence against Women and Domestic Violence in Tbilisi, Kakheti and Samegrelo-ZemoSvaneti Regions of Georgia (2013), Report, Institute of Policy Studies, UN Women, Georgia.
Tsuladze, L. (2010), Behind the Scenes: Qualitative Research Results, in National Research on Domestic Violence against Women in Georgia, Tbilisi: UNFPA.
UN (United Nations).(2015), The World's Women 2015. Trends and Statistics, New York: United Nation. http://unstats.un.org/unsd/gender/downloads/WorldsWomen2015_report.pdf (Accessed 5th may 2016).
UN Women. (2014), Georgia – National Report, Georgia component of a multi-country study on support services for women and girls subjected to gender-based violence, UN Women.
UN Women. (2016), ‘Facts and Figures: Ending Violence against Women’. http://www.unwomen.org/en/what-we-do/ending-violence-against-women/facts-and-figures (Accessed 5th May 2016).
Verloo, M. (ed). (2007), Multiple Meanings of Gender Equality: A Critical Frame Analysis of Gender Policies in Europe, Budapest: Central European University Press.
Verloo, M. et al. (2011), Final Quality in Gender + Equality Policies (QUING) Report, Vienna: Institute for Human Sciences.
Video recordings of parliamentary hearings on adopting anti-domestic violence law in 2006. (2006), Public Broadcaster collection.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Social Policy
  • ISSN: 0047-2794
  • EISSN: 1469-7823
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-social-policy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed