Skip to main content

Applied Social Science? Academic Contributions to the Stephen Lawrence Inquiry and Their Consequences

  • KARIM MURJI (a1)

A decade on from the Stephen Lawrence Inquiry, this article examines the contributions of social scientists to the Inquiry on two key issues: the meaning of institutional racism and the police response to racial violence. These academic inputs are characterised as instrumental and reflexive forms of knowledge. While social science applied to social policy is most effective in instrumental mode, rather than reflexively, there are various factors – such as the interpretation of evidence, media debate and the role of prominent individuals – that are more significant in assessing its consequences. The impact of these factors mean that, although academic work on these issues has been influential, the outcome appears to be that institutional racism has run its course and been disowned or downgraded, while racial violence has become subsumed within the broader category of hate crime. It is argued that the relationship between academic knowledge and policy requires a better grasp of the complexities of applying social science, and that is what this article aims to make a contribution to.

Hide All
Bennetto J. (2009), Police and Racism: What Has Been Achieved 10 Years after the Stephen Lawrence Inquiry Report?, London: Equality and Human Rights Commission.
Blair I. (2009), Policing Controversy, London: Profile Books.
Bowling B. (1999), Violent Racism, revised edition, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bowling B. with Grieve J. (2009), ‘Violent racism, policing, safety and justice 10 years after Lawrence’, in Hall N., Grieve J. and Savage S. (eds.), Policing and the Legacy of Lawrence, Cullompton, Devon: Willan Publishing.
British Journal of Sociology (2004), 55: 1.
Burawoy M. (2005), ‘For public sociology’, British Journal of Sociology, 56: 259–94.
Cathcart B. (1999), The Case of Stephen Lawrence, London: Viking.
Chancer L. and McLaughlin E. (2007), ‘Public criminologies’, Theoretical Criminology, 11: 2, 155–73.
Critical Social Policy (2008), Special Issue: Social Science and Public Policy: Reflections on the Link, 28: 3.
Erikksen T. (2006), Engaging Anthropology, Oxford: Berg.
Essed P. (1991), Understanding Everyday Racism, London: Sage.
Ford R. (2008), ‘Is racial prejudice declining in Britain?’, British Journal of Sociology, 59: 4, 609–36.
Foster J. (2008), ‘It might have been incompetent but it wasn't racist’, Policing and Society, 18: 89112.
Foster J., Souhami A. and Newburn T. (2005), Assessing the Impact of the Stephen Lawrence Inquiry, Research study no. 294, London: Home Office.
Griffiths B. (2009), ‘Doing the right thing’, in Hall N., Grieve J. and Savage S. (eds.), Policing and the Legacy of Lawrence, Cullompton, Devon: Willan Publishing.
Hall N. (2005), Hate Crime, Cullompton, Devon: Willan Publishing.
Hall N., Grieve J. and Savage S. (eds.) (2009), Policing and Legacy of Lawrence, Cullompton, Devon: Willan Publishing.
Hesse B., Rai D., Bennett C. and McGilchrist P. (1992), Beneath the Surface, Aldershot: Avebury.
Holdaway S. and O'Neill M. (2006), ‘Institutional racism after Macpherson’, Policing and Society, 16: 349–69.
Home Affairs Committee (2009), The Macpherson Report – Ten Years On, London: The Stationery Office.
Iganski P. (2008), ‘Hate Crime’ and the City, Bristol: Policy Press.
Institute of Employment Studies (2003), A Review of Community Race Relations Training in the Metropolitan Police Service, Brighton: IES.
Keith M. (2008), ‘Public sociology?’, Critical Social Policy, 28: 3, 320–34.
McLaughlin E. (2005), ‘Recovering blackness/repudiating whiteness’, in Murji K. and Solomos J. (eds.), Racialization, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Macpherson W. (1999), The Stephen Lawrence Inquiry, London: The Stationery Office.
Murji K. (2007), ‘Sociological engagements’, Sociology, 41: 843–55.
Neal S. (2003), ‘The Scarman report, the Macpherson report and the media’, Journal of Social Policy, 32: 5574.
Phillips T. (2009), ‘Institutions must catch up with public on race issues’, 19 January, (accessed 19 January 2009).
Rock P. (2004), Constructing Victims’ Rights, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Rowe M. (ed.) (2007), Policing after Macpherson, Cullompton, Devon: Willan Publishing.
Rowe M. and Garland J. (2007), ‘Police diversity training’, in Rowe M. (ed.), Policing after Macpherson, Cullompton, Devon: Willan Publishing.
Runnymede Trust (2009), The Stephen Lawrence Inquiry 10 Years On: An Analysis of the Literature, London: Runnymede Trust.
Smith S. (ed.) (2007), Applying Theory to Practice, Aldershot: Ashgate.
Sociology (2007), Special Issue on Sociology and Its Public Face(s), 41: 5.
Stone R. (2009), Stephen Lawrence Review: An Independent Commentary, London: Uniting Britain Trust.
Stout B., Yates J. and Williams B. (eds.) (2008), Applied Criminology, London: Sage.
Tonry M. (2004), Punishment and Politics, Cullompton, Devon: Willan Publishing.
Wight C. (2003), ‘The agency-structure problem and institutional racism’, Political Studies, 51: 706–21.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Social Policy
  • ISSN: 0047-2794
  • EISSN: 1469-7823
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-social-policy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 3
Total number of PDF views: 52 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 222 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 18th January 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.