Skip to main content Accessibility help

Closing the Childcare Gap: The Interaction of Childcare Provision and Mothers' Agency in Norway



In most European countries a ‘childcare gap’ exists: that is, a discrepancy between the demand for and provision of childcare. Among the countries that are succeeding in closing the gap are the Nordic welfare states. Hence, knowledge about how childcare provision in these countries has developed is of wide interest. This article stresses the importance of studying how the interactive processes of changing provision and demand explain the building up and the closing of national childcare gaps. Although there are similarities in the development of Nordic childcare services, some differences stand out. The comparison indicates that complex societal processes interact in shaping provision and demand. These dynamics are explored in more detail in the Norwegian case, where the interactive processes have produced an ever-increasing demand for childcare. The demand side is crucial, particularly the role of mothers in generating momentum for policy change. Mothers' changing labour market patterns and their demand for childcare are important driving forces for policy change.



Hide All
Anttonen, A. and Sipilä, J. 1996, ‘European social care services: is it possible to identify models?’, Journal of European Social Policy, 6: 87100.
Asplan Viak 2004, Analyse av barnehagetall per, 20 April, Oslo.
Beck, U. and Giddens, A. 2005, ‘Discovering real Europe: a cosmopolitan vision’,
Bergqvist, C. and Nyberg, A. 2001, ‘Den svenska barnomsorgsmodellen – kontinuitet och förändring under 1990-talet’, in SOU 2001:52 Med välfärdsstaten som arbetsgivare, Stockholm.
Berman, Y. 2006, ‘Book review’, Journal of Social Policy, 35: 324–5.
Blix, K. W. and Gulbrandsen, L. 1993, ‘Småbarnsmødre er ikke noe B-lag på arbeidsmarkedet’, Søkelys på arbeidsmarkedet, 9: 1721.
Borchorst, A. 2002, ‘Danish childcare policy: continuity rather than radical change’, in Michel, S. and Mahon, R. (eds), Childcare Policy at the Crossroads: Gender and Welfare State Restructuring, New York: Routledge.
Crompton, R. 2006, Employment and the Family, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Daly, M. 2000, ‘A fine balance: women's labor market participation in international comparison’, in Scharpf, F. W. and Schmid, V. A. (eds), Welfare and Work in the Open Economy, Volume II, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Deacon, A. and Mann, K. 1999, ‘Agency, modernity and social policy’, Journal of Social Policy, 28: 3, 413–35.
Duncan, S. and Strell, M. 2004, ‘Combining lone motherhood and paid work: the rationality mistake in Norwegian social policy’, Journal of European Social Policy, 14: 1, 4154.
Edwards, R. and Duncan, S. 1996, ‘Rational economic man or lone mothers in context?’, in Silva, E. B. (ed.), Good Enough Mothering?, London: Routledge.
Ellingsæter, A. L. 2003, ‘The complexity of family policy reform: the case of Norway’, European Societies, 5: 4, 419–43.
Ellingsæter, A. L. 2006, ‘The Norwegian childcare regime and its paradoxes’, in Ellingsæter, A. L. and Leira, A. (eds), Politicising Parenthood in Scandinavia: Gender Relations in Welfare States, Bristol: Policy Press.
Ellingsæter, A.L. and Gulbrandsen, L. 2003, Barnehagen – fra selektivt til universelt velferdsgode, Oslo: NOVA.
Elster, J. 1983, Sour Grapes:. Studies in the Subversion of Rationality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Esping-Andersen, G. 2002, ‘A child-centred social investment strategy’, in Esping-Andersen, G. et al. , Why We Need a New Welfare State, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Evers, A., Lewis, J. and Riedel, B. 2005, ‘Developing child-care provision in England and Germany: problems of governance’, Journal of European Social Policy, 15: 3, 195209.
Fagan, C. 2001, ‘Time, money and the gender order: work orientations and working-time preferences in Britain’, Gender, Work and Organization, 8: 3, 239–65.
Gulbrandsen, L. 1996, ‘Meninger om barneomsorg og yrkesaktivitet’, in NOU (1996:13): Overføringer til barnefamilier, Vedlegg nr 13.
Gulbrandsen, L. and Hellevik, T. 2000, Kontantstøtteordningens konsekvenser for barne-hagesektoren, Oslo: NOVA.
Hakim, C. 1999, ‘Models of the family, women's role and social policy: a new perspective from preference theory’, European Societies, 1: 1, 3358.
Himmelweit, S. and Sigala, M. 2004, ‘Choice and the relationship between identities and behaviour for mothers with pre-school children: some implications for policy from a UK study’, Journal of Social Policy, 33: 3, 455–78.
Hoggett, P. 2001, ‘Agency, rationality and social policy’, Journal of Social Policy, 30: 1, 3756.
Huber, E. and Stephens, J. 2000, ‘Partisan governance, women's employment, and the social democratic service state’, American Sociological Review, 65: 323–42.
Håland, I. and Næringsrud, G. 2004, ‘7 av 10 mødre med barn i kontantstøttealder jobber’, Magasinet, Oslo: Statistics Norway.
Jenson, J. 2004, ‘Changing the paradigm: family responsibility or investing in children’, Canadian Journal of Sociology, 29: 2, 169–92.
Jenson, J. and Sineau, M. 2001, ‘Citizenship in the era of welfare state redesign’, in Jenson, J. and Sineau, M. (eds), Who Cares? Women's Work, Childcare, and Welfare State Redesign, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Kingdon, J. D. 1984, Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies, New York: Harper Collins.
Korpi, W. 2000, ‘Faces of inequality: gender, class and patterns of inequalities in different types of welfare states’, Social Politics, 7: 127–91.
Leira, A. 1992, Welfare States and Working Mothers, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Magnussen, M.-L., Godal, B. and Leira, A. 2001, Hvem skal passe barna? Kontantstøtte, barnetilsyn og foreldres lønnsarbeid, Oslo: University of Oslo, Dept of Sociology and Human Geography.
Mahon, R. 2002, ‘Childcare: toward what kind of “social Europe”?’, Social Politics, 9: 343–79.
Michel, S. 1999, Children's Interests/Mothers’ Rights: The Shaping of America's Childcare Policy, New Haven: Yale University Press.
Nordic Council of Ministers 2006, Nordic Statistical Yearbook 2006, Copenhagen.
Nyberg, A. 2003, ‘From foster mothers to care centres: a history of working mothers and childcare in Sweden’, Feminist Economics, 6: 1, 520.
OECD 2001, Starting Strong. Early Childhood Education and Care, Paris.
Olson, K. 2002, ‘Recognising gender, redistributing labor’, Social Politics, 9: 380410.
Pfau-Effinger, B. 2005, ‘Culture and welfare state policies: reflections on a complex interrelation’, Journal of Social Policy, 34: 1, 320.
Plantenga, J. and Remery, C. 2005, Reconciliation of Work and Private Life:. A Comparative Review of Thirty European Countries, Brussels: European Commission.
Roseneil, S. and Williams, F. 2004, ‘Introduction to the special issue’, Social Politics, 1: 2, 147–53.
Rønsen, M. 2005, Kontantstøttens langsiktige effekter på mødres og fedres arbeidstilbud, Oslo: Statistics Norway.
Salmi, M. 2006, ‘Parental choice and the passion for equality in Finland’, in Ellingsæter, A. L. and Leira, A. (eds), Politicising Parenthood in Scandinavia: Gender Relations in Welfare States, Bristol: Policy Press.
Schøne, P. 2002, ‘Kontantstøtten og effekter på arbeidstilbudet: Hva er en god sammenligningsgruppe?’, Søkelys på arbeidsmarkedet, 19: 1, 2330.
Smart, C. 2005, ‘Texture of family life: further thoughts on change and commitment’, Journal of Social Policy, 34: 4, 541–56.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Closing the Childcare Gap: The Interaction of Childcare Provision and Mothers' Agency in Norway



Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.