Bredgaard, T. and Larsen, F. (2008), ‘Quasi-markets in employment policy: do they deliver on promises?’, Social Policy and Society, 7: 3, 341–52.
Bryson, A. and Kasparova, D. (2003), Profiling Benefit Claimants in Britain: A Feasibility Study, Research Report 196, London: Department for Work and Pensions.
Considine, M., Lewis, J. and O’Sullivan, S. (2011), ‘Quasi-markets and service delivery flexibility following a decade of employment assistance reform in Australia’, Journal of Social Policy, 40: 4, 811–33.
Davies, S. (2008), ‘Contracting out employment services to the third and private sectors: a critique’, Critical Social Policy, 28: 2, 136–64.
de Graaf, W. and Sirovatka, T. (2012), ‘Governance reforms and their impacts on the effects of activation policies’, International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 32: 5/6, 353–63.
Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) (2013), Employment and Support Allowance – Incapacity Benefits Reassessments: Outcomes of Work Capability Assessments, Great Britain, Issue 29, January.
Finn, D. (2009), Differential Pricing In Contracted Out Employment Programmes: Review of International Evidence, Research Report No. 564, London: Department for Work and Pensions.
Finn, D. (2011a), Sub-Contracting In Public Employment Services: Review of Research Findings and Literature on Recent Trends and Business Models, DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion, European Commission.
Finn, D. (2011b), Job Services Australia: Design and Implementation Lessons for the British Context, Research Report No. 752, Sheffield: Department for Work and Pensions.
Finn, D. (2012), Sub-Contracting In Public Employment Services: The Design and Delivery of Outcome Based and Black Box Contracts, DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion, European Commission.
Fryer, D. (1986) ‘Employment, deprivation and personal agency during unemployment: a critical discussion of Jahoda's explanation of the psychological effects of unemployment’, Social Behaviour, 1: 3–23.
Hasluck, C. (2004), Targetting Services in the Individual Customer Strategy: The Role of Profiling. A Review of the Research Evidence, Research Report 192, Sheffield: Department for Work and Pensions.
Lane, P., Foster, R., Gardiner, L., Lanceley, L. and Purvis, A. (2013), Work Programme Evaluation: Procurement, Supply Chains and Implementation of the Commissioning Model, London: Department for Work and Pensions.
Lister, R. and Bennett, F. (2010), ‘The new “champion of progressive ideals?” Cameron's Conservative Party: poverty, family policy and welfare reform’, Renewal, 18: 1/2, 84–109.
Matty, S. (2013), Predicting Likelihood of Long-Term Unemployment: The Development of a UK Jobseekers’ Classification Instrument, Working Paper No. 116, Department for Work and Pensions.
National Audit Office (NAO) (2012) Introduction of the Work Programme, London: The Stationery Office.
Newton, B., Meager, N., Bertram, C., Corden, A., George, A., Lalani, M., Metcalf, H., Rolfe, H., Sainsbury, R. and Weston, K. (2012), Work Programme Evaluation: Findings from the First Phase of Qualitative Research on Programme Delivery, Research Report No. 821, Sheffield: Department for Work and Pensions.
OECD (2012), Activating Jobseekers: How Australia Does It, OECD Publishing.
Public Accounts Committee (PAC) (2012), Department for Work and Pensions: The Introduction of the Work Programme, Eighty-Fifth Report of Session 2010–12, London: The Stationery Office.
Public Accounts Committee (PAC) (2013), Department for Work and Pensions: Work Programme Outcome Statistics, Thirty-Third Report of Session 2012–13, London: The Stationery Office.
Rees, J., Taylor, R. and Damm, C. (2013), Does Sector Matter: The Role of the Third Sector in the Work Programme, Third Sector Research Centre Working Paper No. 92, University of Birmingham: Third Sector Research Centre.
Riley, T., Bivand, P. and Wilson, T. (2014) Making the Work Programme Work for ESA Claimants, London: Inclusion.
Struyven, L. and Steurs, G. (2005), ‘Design and redesign of a quasi-market for the reintegration of jobseekers: empirical evidence from Australia and the Netherlands’, Journal of European Social Policy, 15: 3, 211–29.
University of Essex (2009–11), Understanding Society, Waves 1-2, 2009–2011, 4th edn, UK Data Archive, Colchester, Essex: Institute for Social and Economic Research and National Centre for Social Research.
van Berkel, R. (2010), ‘The provision of income protection and activation services for the unemployed in “active” welfare states: an international comparison’, Journal of Social Policy, 39: 1, 17–34.
van Berkel, R. and van der Aa, P. (2005), ‘The marketization of activation services: a modern panacea? Some lessons from the Dutch experience’, Journal of European Social Policy, 15: 4, 329–43.
van Berkel, R., Sagar, F. and Ehler, F. (2012), ‘The diversity of activation markets in Europe’, International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 32: 5/6, 273–85.
Work and Pensions Select Committee (WPSC) (2011), Work Programme: Providers and Contracting Arrangements, Fourth Report of Session 2010–12, London: The Stationery Office.
Work and Pensions Select Committee (WPSC) (2013), Can the Work Programme Work for all User Groups? First Report of Session 2013–14, London: The Stationery Office.
Ziliak, S. and McCloskey, D. (2008), The Cult of Statistical Significance: How the Standard Error Cost Us Jobs, Justice And Lives, Michigan: University of Michigan Press.