Skip to main content
×
×
Home

How Women's Political Representation affects Spending on Family Benefits

  • LAURENZ ENNSER-JEDENASTIK (a1)
Abstract
Abstract

Recent research finds that women's political representation correlates with higher social expenditures. This paper makes two more specific predictions regarding family benefits. First, women voters and politicians are likely to prefer in-kind benefits to cash transfers. This is because the provision of childcare does more than money can do to ameliorate the double burden of work and family duties, thus strengthening women's autonomy. As a consequence female political representation should correlate with spending on in-kind family benefits, but not with expenditures on cash transfers. Second, the pressure on politicians to provide childcare services should be greater when there are higher levels of female participation in the labour force. Assuming that women politicians are more responsive to such demands, we should see a positive interaction effect between female labour force participation and women's political representation on in-kind spending. An analysis of public expenditures for family benefits in 27 OECD nations between 1980 and 2011 bears out both propositions.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Armingeon K., Isler C., Knöpfel L., Weisstanner D. and Engler S. (2015), Comparative Political Data Set 1960–2013, Bern, Institute of Political Science, University of Bern.
Beck N. and Katz J.N. (1995), ‘What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data’, American Political Science Review, 89: 3, 634647.
Bertone C. (2003), ‘Claims for child care as struggles over needs: Comparing Italian and Danish women's organizations’, Social Politics, 10: 2, 229255.
Bolzendahl C. and Brooks C. (2007), ‘Women's political representation and welfare state spending in 12 capitalist democracies’, Social Forces, 85: 4, 15091534.
Bolzendahl C. (2009), ‘Making the implicit explicit: Gender influences on social spending in twelve industrialized democracies, 1980–99’, Social Politics, 16: 1, 4081.
Bolzendahl C. (2010), ‘Directions of Decommodification: Gender and Generosity in 12 OECD Nations, 1980–2000’, European Sociological Review, 26: 2, 125141.
Bolzendahl C. (2011), ‘Beyond the big picture: gender influences on disaggregated and domain-specific measures of social spending, 1980–1999’, Politics & Gender, 7: 01, 3570.
Bonoli G. and Reber F. (2010), ‘The political economy of childcare in OECD countries: Explaining cross-national variation in spending and coverage rates’, European Journal of Political Research, 49: 1, 97118.
Brambor T., Clark W.R. and Golder M. (2006), ‘Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyses’, Political Analysis, 14: 1, 6382.
Bratton K.A. and Ray L.P. (2002), ‘Descriptive representation, policy outcomes, and municipal day-care coverage in Norway’, American Journal of Political Science, 46: 2, 428437.
Bussemaker J. and Van Kersbergen K. (1994), ‘Gender and welfare states: some theoretical reflections’, in Sainsbury D. (ed.), Gendering welfare states, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Childs S. and Krook M.L. (2008), ‘Critical mass theory and women's political representation’, Political Studies, 56: 3, 725736.
Cooke L.P. (2009), ‘Gender equity and fertility in Italy and Spain’, Journal of Social Policy, 38: 1, 123140.
Craig L. and Mullan K. (2011), ‘How mothers and fathers share childcare: a cross-national time-use comparison’, American Sociological Review, 76: 6, 834861.
Dahlerup D. (1988), ‘From a small to a large minority: women in Scandinavian politics’, Scandinavian Political Studies, 11: 4, 275298.
Finseraas H., Jakobsson N. and Kotsadam A. (2012), ‘The gender gap in political preferences: An empirical test of a political economy explanation’, Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 19: 2, 219242.
Flora P. and Heidenheimer A.J. (1981), The development of welfare states in Europe and America, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Förster M.F. and Verbist G. (2012), Money or kindergarten? Distributive effects of cash versus in-kind family transfers for young children, Paris: OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers No. 135.
Giles-Sims J., Green J.C. and Lockhart C. (2012), ‘Do Women Legislators Have a Positive Effect on the Supportiveness of States Toward Older Citizens?’, Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 33: 1, 3864.
Gustafsson S. (1994), ‘Childcare and types of welfare states’, in Sainsbury D. (ed.), Gendering Welfare States, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hobson B. and Lindholm M. (1997), ‘Collective identities, women's power resources, and the making of welfare states’, Theory and Society, 26: 4, 475508.
Huber E. and Stephens J.D. (2000), ‘Partisan governance, women's employment, and the social democratic service state’, American Sociological Review, 65: 3, 323342.
Huber E. and Stephens J.D. (2001), Development and crisis of the welfare state: parties and policies in global markets, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Inglehart R. and Norris P. (2003), Rising tide: Gender equality and cultural change around the world, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Iversen T. and Rosenbluth F. (2006), ‘The Political Economy of Gender: Explaining Cross-National Variation in the Gender Division of Labor and the Gender Voting Gap’, American Journal of Political Science, 50: 1, 119.
Jenson J. (1986), ‘Gender and reproduction, or babies and the state’, Studies in Political Economy, 20: 20, 946.
Jenson J. and Mahon R. (1993), ‘Representing solidarity: class, gender and the crisis in Social-Democratic Sweden’, New Left Review, I: 201, 76100.
Kamerman S.B. and Gatenio-Gabel S. (2010), ‘Cash vs. care: a child and family policy issue’, in Sipilä J., Repo K. and Rissanen T. (eds.), Cash-for-Childcare, The Consequences for Caring Mothers, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Kanter R.M. (1977a), Men and Women of the Corporation, New York: Basic books.
Kanter R.M. (1977b), ‘Some effects of proportions on group life: Skewed sex ratios and responses to token women’, American Journal of Sociology, 82: 5, 965990.
Kittilson M.C. (2008), ‘Representing women: The adoption of family leave in comparative perspective’, The Journal of Politics, 70: 02, 323334.
Korpi W. (1983), The democratic class struggle, London: Routledge.
Krook M.L. and O'Brien D.Z. (2012), ‘All the president's men? The appointment of female cabinet ministers worldwide’, The Journal of Politics, 74: 03, 840855.
Lewis J. (1992), ‘Gender and the development of welfare regimes’, Journal of European Social Policy, 2: 3, 159173.
Lewis J. and Åström G. (1992), ‘Equality, difference, and state welfare: labor market and family policies in Sweden’, Feminist Studies, 18: 1, 5987.
Lovenduski J. and Norris P. (2003), ‘Westminster women: The politics of presence’, Political Studies, 51: 1, 84102.
Misra J. (2003), ‘Women as agents in welfare state development: a cross-national analysis of family allowance adoption’, Socio-Economic Review, 1: 2, 185214.
O'Brien D.Z., Mendez M., Peterson J.C. and Shin J. (2015), ‘Letting Down the Ladder or Shutting the Door: Female Prime Ministers, Party Leaders, and Cabinet Ministers’, Politics & Gender, 11: 4, 689717.
OECD (2014), Social Expenditure Database. DOI: 10.1787/els-socx-data-en.
Orloff A.S. (1993), ‘Gender and the social rights of citizenship: The comparative analysis of gender relations and welfare states’, American Sociological Review, 58: 3, 303328.
Orloff A.S. (1996), ‘Gender in the welfare state’, Annual Review of Sociology, 22: 1, 5178.
Phillips A. (1995), The politics of presence, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Sainsbury D. (1994), Gendering welfare states, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Sainsbury D. (1999), Gender and Welfare State Regimes, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Scruggs L. and Allan J. (2006), ‘Welfare-state decommodification in 18 OECD countries: a replication and revision’, Journal of European Social Policy, 16: 1, 5572.
Sefton T., Evandrou M. and Falkingham J. (2011), ‘Family ties: women's work and family histories and their association with incomes in later life in the UK’, Journal of Social Policy, 40: 1, 4169.
Skocpol T. (1992), Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Stephens J.D. (1979), The transition from capitalism to socialism: Urbana, IL.
Svaleryd H. (2009), ‘Women's representation and public spending’, European Journal of Political Economy, 25: 2, 186198.
Swiss L., Fallon K.M. and Burgos G. (2012), ‘Does critical mass matter? Women's political representation and child health in developing countries’, Social Forces, 91: 2, 531558.
Weir M., Orloff A.S. and Skocpol T. (1988), The politics of social policy in the United States, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Wilensky H.L. (1975), The welfare state and equality: structural and ideological roots of public expenditures, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Social Policy
  • ISSN: 0047-2794
  • EISSN: 1469-7823
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-social-policy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 11
Total number of PDF views: 106 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 553 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 16th January 2017 - 15th December 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.