Skip to main content
×
Home

Do Personal Budgets Increase the Risk of Abuse? Evidence from English National Data

  • MOHAMED ISMAIL (a1), SHEREEN HUSSEIN (a2), MARTIN STEVENS (a3), JOHN WOOLHAM (a4), JILL MANTHORPE (a5), FIONA ASPINAL (a6), KATE BAXTER (a7) and KRITIKA SAMSI (a8)...
Abstract
Abstract

With the continued implementation of the personalisation policy, Personal Budgets (PBs) have moved to the mainstream in adult social care in England. The relationship between the policy goals of personalisation and safeguarding is contentious. Some have argued that PBs have the potential to empower recipients, while others believe PBs, especially Direct Payments, might increase the risk of abuse.

This paper provides empirical evidence about levels of uptake of PBs and safeguarding referrals in England based on in-depth analysis of national data at aggregate, local council level in England, covering 152 Councils. This is complemented by analysis of 2,209 individual referral records obtained from three purposively selected study sites. The aim is to explore whether available data could provide evidence of association between the uptake of PBs and safeguarding referrals. Analysis of the national dataset found no significant relationships between PB uptake and the level and type of alleged abuse. However, analysis of individual-level referral data, from the three selected sites did find some significant associations particularly with financial abuse; and found the main perpetrators of the alleged abuse to be home-care employees. The findings are discussed within the context of current policy and practice.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Do Personal Budgets Increase the Risk of Abuse? Evidence from English National Data
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Do Personal Budgets Increase the Risk of Abuse? Evidence from English National Data
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Do Personal Budgets Increase the Risk of Abuse? Evidence from English National Data
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
References
Hide All
Barnes M. (2011), ‘Abandoning Care? A Critical Perspective on Personalisation from an Ethic of Care’, Ethics and Social Welfare, 5 (2): 153167.
Baxter K. and Glendinning C. (2008), Making informed choices in social care: The importance of accessible information, Health and Social Care in the Community, 16 (2): 197207.
Bayern M. D. K. (2008), Prisma Gesundheit. Die soziale Pftegeversicherung. Landsberg: Ecomed MEdizin.
Beresford P. (2014), Personalisation, Policy Press, Bristol.
Boxall K., Dowson S. and Beresford P. (2009), Selling Individual Budgets, Choice and Control: Local and Global Influences on UK Social Care Policy for People with Learning Difficulties, Policy and Politics, 37 (4): 499515.
Brennan D., Cass B., Himmelweit S. and Szebehely M. (2012), The marketization of care: rationales and consequences in Nordic and liberal care regimes. Journal of European Social Policy, 22 (4): 377391.
Carr S. (2012), Personalisation: a rough guide. London, Social Care Institute for Excellence (SCIE Guide 47). Available from: http://www.scie.org.uk/publications/guides/guide47/ (Checked 27/04/2016).
Chambers J. M., Cleveland W. S., Kleiner B. and Tukey P. A. (1983), Graphical Methods for Data Analysis. Wadsworth & Brooks/Cole.
Colombo F, Llena-Nozal A, Mercier J. and Tjadens F. (2011), Help wanted? Providing and paying for long-term Care, OECD Health Policy Studies, OECD Publishing.
Daly G. (2012), Citizenship, choice and care: and examination of the promotion of choice in the provision of adult social care. Research Policy and Planning, 29 (3):179190.
Department of Health (2014), Care and Support Statutory Guidance Issued under the Care Act 2014, London: Department of Health. Accessed on 15/5/2015 https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/366104/43380_23902777_Care_Act_Book.pdf
Department of Health [DH] (2010), A Vision for Adult Social Care: Capable Communities and Active Citizens, Department of Health, London.
Duffy S. and Gillespie J. (2009), Personalisation and Safeguarding: a discussion paper. Accessed online 27/4/2015 http://www.in-control.org.uk/media/52833/personalisation%20safeguarding%20discussion%20paper%20version%201.0.pdf
Ferguson I. (2007), Increasing user choice or privatizing risk? The antinomies of personalisation, British Journal of Social Work, 37 (3): 387403.
Gardiner L. and Hussein S. (2015), As if we cared: the costs and benefits of a living wage for social care workers, The Resolution Foundation: London.
Gheera M. (2012), Direct payments and personal budgets for social care. House of Commons Library, Social Policy Section, SN/SP/3735
Glasby J. (2011), Whose risk is it anyway? Risk and regulation in an era of personalisation, Journal of Care Services Management, 5 (4) 173183.
Glendinning C (2012), ‘Home care in England: Markets in the context of under-funding’, Health & Social Care in the Community, 20: 292299.
Glendinning C., Arksey H., Jones K., Moran N., Netten A. and Rabiee P. (2008), The National Evaluation of the Individual Budgets Pilot Programme: Experiences and Implications for Care Coordinators and Managers, Social Policy Research Unit, University of York, York.
Henwood M. and Hudson B. (2007), Review of the Independent Living Funds, London: Department for Work and Pensions.
HM Government (2007), Putting People First: A Shared Vision and Commitment to the Transformation of Adult Social Care. London: HM Government.
HSCIC (2014), Measures from the Adult Social Care Outcomes Framework, England - 2013–14, Final release. Accessed on 15/5/2015 http://www.hscic.gov.uk/article/2021/Website-Search?productid=16655&q=Self+directed+support+definition&sort=Relevance&size=10&page=1#top
Hussein S. (2011), Estimating probabilities and numbers of direct care workers paid under the National Minimum Wage in the UK: A Bayesian approach. Social Care Workforce Periodical, Issue 16: December 2011 London: ISSN 2047–9638.
Hussein S., Stevens M., Manthorpe J., Rapaport J., Martineau S. and Harris J. (2009), Banned from working in social care: a secondary analysis of staff characteristics and reasons for their referrals to the POVA list in England and Wales, Health & Social Care in the Community, 17 (5): 423433.
Ismail M. (forthcoming) Challenges of using national administrative data for research purposes: A case study of the English social care data.
Leece J. (2010), ‘Paying the piper and calling the tune: Power and the direct payment relationship’, British Journal of Social Work, 40: 188206.
Lewis J. and West A. (2014), Re-Shaping Social Care Services for Older People in England: Policy Development and the Problem of Achieving ‘Good Care. Journal of Social Policy, 43 (1): 118.
Lloyd L. (2010), The Individual in Social Care: The Ethics of Care and the ‘Personalisation Agenda’ in Services for Older People in England, Ethics and Social Welfare, 4 (2): 188200. doi: 10.1080/17496535.2010.484262
Manthorpe J. and Samsi K. (2013), ‘Inherently risky? Personal budgets for people with dementia and the risks of financial abuse: findings from an interview-based study with Adult Safeguarding Co-ordinators’, British Journal of Social Work, 43 (5): 889903
Manthorpe J., Stevens M., Samsi K., Aspinal F., Woolham J., Hussein S., Ismail M. and Baxter K. (2015), Did anyone notice the transformation of adult social care? An analysis of Safeguarding Adult Board Annual Reports. Journal of Adult Protection, 17 (1): 1930.
Mickel A. (2008), ‘What's the outlook for adult social care?’ Community Care, 23 October, pp. 28–30.
Noble M., McLennan D., Wilkinson K., Whitworth A., Dibben C. and Barnes H. (2008), English indices of deprivation 2007. London: Communities and local government.
O'Keeffe M., Hills A., Doyle M., McCreadie C., Scholes S., Constantine R., Tinker A., Manthorpe J., Biggs S. and Erens B. (2007), UK Study of Abuse and Neglect of Older People. Prevalence Survey Report, London: Comic Relief; Department of Health.
Oliver M. and Sapey B. (1999), Social Work with Disabled People (2nd ed). Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Pavolini E. and Ranci C. (2008), Restructuring the welfare state: reforms in long-term care in Western European countries, Journal of European Social Policy, 18 (3): 246259.
Pavolini E. and Ranci C. (2014), Reforms in long term care policies in Europe: An introduction. In (eds.) Ranci C. and Pavolini E. (2014) Reforms in Long-Term Care Policies in Europe: Investigating institutional change and social impacts. Springer: New York.
R Development Core Team (2007), R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.
Samsi K., Manthorpe J. and Chandaria K. (2014, online), ‘Risks of financial abuse of older people with dementia: findings from a survey of UK voluntary sector dementia community services staff’, Journal of Adult Protection, 16 (3).
Schwehr B. (2010), Safeguarding and personalisation, The Journal of Adult Protection, 12 (2): 4351.
Slasberg C., Beresford P. and Schofield P. (2012), ‘How self directed support is failing to deliver personal budgets and Personalisation’ Research, Policy and Planning 29 (3) 161177.
Stevens M., Manthorpe J., Hussein S., Ismail M., Woolham J., Samsi K., Baxter K. and Aspinal F. (2014), ‘Risk, Safeguarding and Personal Budgets: exploring relationships and identifying good practice’, London: NIHR School for Social Care Research. Available from: http://www.kcl.ac.uk/sspp/policy-institute/scwru/pubs/2014/reports/Stevens-et-al-2014-Risk-Research-Findings.pdf
Stevens M., Woolham J., Manthorpe J., Aspinal F., Hussein S., Baxter K., Samsi K. and Ismail M. (online, 2016), ‘Implementing safeguarding and personalisation in social work: findings from practice’, Journal of Social Work. doi: 10.1177/1468017316652001, 28th May 2016.
Tyson A. (2008), Service providers and Commissioners. In Poll C. and Duffy S., (Eds) A report of In Control's Second Phase Evaluation and Learning 2005–2007. P. 111–20 In Control Publications.
Ungerson C. (1997), ‘Social politics and the commodification of care’, Social Politics, 4: 362–81.
Ungerson C. and Yeandle S (2007), ‘Conclusions: Dilemmas, contradictions and change’ in Ungerson C. and Yeandle S. (eds), Cash for Care in Developed Welfare States Palgrave Macmillan, Houndsmills Basingstoke: 187206.
Woolham J. and Benton C. (2012), The Costs and Benefits of Personal Budgets for Older People: Evidence from a Single Local Authority. British Journal of Social Work, 43: 14721491.
Woolham J., Daly G., Steils N. and Ritters K, (2015), The Evolution of person-centred care to personalised care, personal budgets and direct payments in England: some implications for older users of social care services. Sociologia e Politische Sociali, 18 (1): 145–62.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Social Policy
  • ISSN: 0047-2794
  • EISSN: 1469-7823
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-social-policy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 67
Total number of PDF views: 380 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 1083 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 9th September 2016 - 14th December 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.