Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T12:01:56.527Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Emerging Welfare Mix for Syrian Refugees in Turkey: The Interplay between Humanitarian Assistance Programmes and the Turkish Welfare System

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2018

VOLKAN YILMAZ Open the ORCID record for VOLKAN YILMAZ [Opens in a new window]
VOLKAN YILMAZ*
Affiliation:
Social Policy, Institute for Graduate Studies in Social Sciences & Social Policy Forum, Boğaziçi University, İstanbul, Turkey email: vyilmaz@boun.edu.tr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper explores the key features of the emerging welfare mix for Syrian refugees in Turkey and identifies the modes of interaction between humanitarian assistance programmes, domestic policy responses and the Turkish welfare system. The welfare mix for Syrian refugees is a joint product of humanitarian assistance programmes implemented by international and domestic non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and domestic social policy programmes. Three policy domains are considered: social assistance schemes, employment and health care services. The paper suggests that granting of temporary protection status to Syrian migrants in Turkey and the agreement between Turkey and the EU shaped the welfare mix by empowering the public sector mandate vis-à-vis the humanitarian actors. As a result, the role of the public sector increases at the expense of NGOs, especially in social assistance and health care, while NGOs are increasingly specialised in protection work (especially in mental health support), where the Turkish welfare system has been weak. Employment has been essentially disregarded, in both humanitarian and social policy programmes, which casts doubt on the prospect of successful economic integration. Finally, this paper argues that the convergence of the rights of immigrants and citizens may well occur in mature components of less comprehensive welfare systems.

Type
Article
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 48 , Issue 4 , October 2019 , pp. 721 - 739
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

AFAD (2015), ‘Genelge (Circular) 2015/8’, https://www.afad.gov.tr/upload/Node/2311/files/2015_8_Gecici_Koruma_altindaki_Yabancilara_Iliskin_Saglik_Hizmetlerinin_Yurutulmesi.pdf [accessed 15.10.2018].Google Scholar
Aljazeera (2016), ‘Erdogan: Syrian Refugees Could Become Turkish Citizens’, http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2016/07/erdogan-syrian-refugees-turkish-citizens-160703133739430.html [accessed 11.07.2017].Google Scholar
Aljazeera (2017), ‘Erdogan Offers Citizenship to Syrian and Iraqi Refugees’, http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2017/01/erdogan-offers-citizenship-syrian-iraqi-refugees-170106195134961.html [accessed 11.07.2017].Google Scholar
Anadolu Agency (2016), ‘Kızılay Kart’ başvuruları başladı (Applications are Open for “Red Crescent Card”)’, http://aa.com.tr/tr/turkiye/kizilay-kart-basvurulari-basladi-/699989 [accessed 11.07.2017].Google Scholar
Anadolu Agency (2017), ‘Türkiye’de 180 bin Suriyeli sığınmacı doğum yaptı (180 Thousand Syrian Asylum Seekers Gave Birth in Turkey)’, https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/turkiye/turkiyede-180-bin-suriyeli-siginmaci-dogum-yapti/730488 [accessed 15.10.2018].Google Scholar
Aras, N.E.G. and Mencutek, Z.S. (2015), ‘The international migration and foreign policy nexus: the case of Syrian refugee crisis and Turkey’, Migration Letters, 12, 3, 193–208.Google Scholar
Asik, G.A. (2017), ‘Turkey badly needs a long-term plan for Syrian refugees’, Harvard Business Review, https://hbr.org/2017/04/turkey-badly-needs-a-long-term-plan-for-syrian-refugees [accessed 6.07.2017].Google Scholar
Baban, F., Ilcan, S. and Rygiel, K. (2017), ‘Syrian refugees in Turkey: pathways to precarity, differential inclusion, and negotiated citizenship rights’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 43, 1, 41–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balkan, A. (2017), ‘Suriyelilerin İŞKUR’u: Rızk (Turkish Employment Agency of Syrians: Rizk)’, http://www.milliyet.com.tr/suriyelilerin-iskur-u-rizk-gundem-2529075/ [accessed 10.11.2017].Google Scholar
Bircan, T. and Sunata, U. (2015), ‘Educational assessment of Syrian refugees in Turkey’, Migration Letters, 12, 3, 226–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bode, I. (2006), ‘Disorganized welfare mixes: voluntary agencies and new governance regimes in Western Europe’, Journal of European Social Policy, 16, 4, 346–359.Google Scholar
Buchanan-Smith, M. and Maxwell, S. (1994), ‘Linking relief and development: an introduction and overview’, IDS Bulletin, 25, 4, 2–16.Google Scholar
Buğra, A. and Keyder, Ç. (2006), ‘The Turkish welfare regime in transformation’, Journal of European Social Policy, 16, 3, 211–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cantekin, D. (2018), ‘Syrian refugees living on the edge: policy and practice implications for mental health and psychosocial wellbeing’, International Migration, 1–15, advance online publication, https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.12508 Google Scholar
Castles, S. (2011), ‘Migration, crisis, and the global labour market’, Globalizations, 8, 3, 311–324.Google Scholar
Çelik, Ç. and Erdoğan, S. (2017), ‘How to organize schools for integration of Syrian children in Turkey; constructing inclusive and intercultural institutional habitus in schools’, in MiReKoc Policy Brief Series 2017/02, Istanbul: Koc University.Google Scholar
Çelik, Ç. and İçduygu, A. (2018), ‘Schools and refugee children: the case of Syrians in Turkey’, International Migration, 1–15, advance online publication, https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.12488 Google Scholar
Daily Sabah (2017), ‘Turkish Gov’t to Set Up New Refugee Healthcare Centers, Employ Syrian Medical Staff’, https://www.dailysabah.com/turkey/2017/01/27/turkish-govt-to-set-up-new-refugee-healthcare-centers-employ-syrian-medical-staff [accessed 15.05.2017].Google Scholar
Danış, D. and Nazlı, D. (2018), ‘A faithful alliance between the civil society and the state: actors and mechanisms of accommodating Syrian refugees in Istanbul’, International Migration, 1–15, advance online publication, https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.12495 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deacon, B. and Stubbs, P. (1998), ‘International actors and social policy development in Bosnia-Herzegovina: globalism and the ‘new feudalism’, Journal of European Social Policy, 8, 99–115.Google Scholar
Development Initiatives (2017), Global Humanitarian Assistance Report 2017, Bristol: Development Initiatives.Google Scholar
DGMM (2017), International Migration Statistics. Republic of Turkey: Ministry of Interior.Google Scholar
Duffield, M. (2001), Global Governance and the New Wars, London & New York: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Eder, M. and Özkul, D. (2016), ‘Editors’ introduction: precarious lives and Syrian refugees in Turkey’, New Perspectives on Turkey, 54, 1–8.Google Scholar
Emmenegger, P. and Klemmensen, R. (2013), ‘Immigration and redistribution revisited: how different motivations can offset each other’, Journal of European Social Policy, 23, 4, 406–422.Google Scholar
Erdoğan, M. (2015), Türkiye’deki Suriyeliler: Toplumsal kabul ve uyum (Syrians in Turkey: Social Acceptance and Harmonization), İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi University Press.Google Scholar
European Commission (2016), ‘Press Release - EU Announces More Projects Under the Facility for Refugees in Turkey: €348 Million in Humanitarian Aid to Refugees in Turkey,’ Brussels: European Commission, Retrieved October 15, 2017, from http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-16-2971_en.htm [accessed 10.11.2017].Google Scholar
European Commission (2017a), ‘EU-Turkey Statement: One Year On’, https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/sites/homeaffairs/files/what-we-do/policies/european-agenda-migration/background-information/eu_turkey_statement_17032017_en.pdf [accessed 11.11.2017].Google Scholar
European Commission (2017b), Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council: First Annual Report on the Facility for Refugees in Turkey, Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
European Commission (2017c), ‘EU-Jordan Partnership: The Compact’, https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/near/files/jordan-compact.pdf [accessed 20.04.2017].Google Scholar
European Commission (2018), ‘EU-Turkey Statement: Two Years On’, https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/sites/homeaffairs/files/what-we-do/policies/european-agenda-migration/20180314_eu-turkey-two-years-on_en.pdf [accessed 12.09.2017].Google Scholar
Evers, A. (1995), ‘Part of the welfare mix: the third sector as an intermediate area’, Voluntas, 6, 2, 159–182.Google Scholar
Fabbe, K., Hazlett, C. and Sinmazdemir, T. (2017), ‘What do Syrians want their future be?’, Foreign Affairs, https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/syria/2017-05-01/what-do-syrians-want-their-future-be [accessed 15.05.2017].Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, J. (2000), ‘Temporary protection of refugees: elements of a formalized regime’, The American Journal of International Law, 94, 2, 279–306.Google Scholar
Francis, A. (2015), Jordan’s Refugee Crisis, Washington, D.C.: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar
Hathaway, J.C. (2001), ‘Temporary protection of refugees: threat or solution?’, in Handmaker, J., et al. (eds.), Perspective on Refugee Protection in South Africa, Pretoria: Lawyers for Human Rights, 41–49.Google Scholar
Hohberger, W. (2018), Opportunities in Higher Education for Syrians in Turkey, Istanbul: Istanbul Policy Center, Sabanci University.Google Scholar
Hürriyet (2016), ‘Eczacılar Suriyelilere ilaç vermeyecek (Pharmacies Will not Supply Medications to Syrians)’, http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/kelebek/saglik/eczacilar-suriyelilere-ilac-vermeyecek-40117929 [accessed 10.09.2018].Google Scholar
Hürriyet (2017), ‘Bakan Kaya: 138 bin Suriyeliye psiko-sosyal destek verildi (Minister Kaya: Psychosocial Support Reached 138 Thousand Syrians)’, http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/bakan-kaya-138-bin-suriyeliye-psiko-sosyal-d-40580050 [accessed 16..10.2018].Google Scholar
Hurriyet Daily News (2016), ‘Turkey Gives Working Permits to 38, 000 Foreigners in Six Months’, http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/turkey-gives-working-permits-to-38000-foreigners-in-six-months-101366 [accessed 11.06.2017].Google Scholar
İçduygu, A. and Diker, E. (2017), ‘Labor market integration of Syrian refugees in Turkey: From refugees to settlers’, The Journal of Migration Studies, 3, 1, 12–35.Google Scholar
İçduygu, A. and Şimşek, D. (2016), ‘Syrian refugees in Turkey: towards integration policies’, Turkish Policy Quarterly, 15, 3, 59–69.Google Scholar
Joppke, C. (2010), Citizenship and Immigration, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Kirişçi, K. (2014), Syrian Refugees and Turkey’s Challenges: Going Beyond Hospitality, Washington, D.C.: Brookings.Google Scholar
Koser, K. and Black, R. (1999), ‘Limits to harmonization: the “temporary protection” of refugees in the European Union’ , International Migration, 37, 3, 521–543.Google Scholar
Lancashire, A. (2015), ‘Turkish refugee camps for Syrians set high standard’, Euronews, https://www.euronews.com/2015/09/09/turkish-refugee-camps-for-syrians-set-high-standard [accessed 16.06.2017].Google Scholar
Leerkes, A. (2016), ‘Back to the poorhouse? Social protection and social control of unauthorised immigrants in the shadow of the welfare state’, Journal of European Social Policy, 26, 140–154.Google Scholar
Long, K. (2013), ‘When refugees stopped being migrants: movement, labour, and humanitarian protection’, Migration Studies, 1, 1, 4–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClelland, M. (2014), ‘How to build a perfect refugee camp’, The New York Times, https://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/16/magazine/how-to-build-a-perfect-refugee-camp.html [accessed 17.06.2017].Google Scholar
Memisoglu, F. and Ilgit, A. (2017), ‘Syrian refugees in Turkey: multifaceted challenges, diverse players and ambiguous policies’, Mediterranean Politics, 22, 3, 317–338.Google Scholar
Moore, J. (1999), ‘The humanitarian-development gap’, Revue Internationale De La Croix-Rouge/International Review of the Red Cross, 81, 103–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Refugee Rights Turkey (2015), Country Report: Turkey. Asylum Information Database (AIDA).Google Scholar
Republic of Turkey (2013), Law No. 6458 on Foreigners and International Protection. Ankara: Republic of Turkey.Google Scholar
Republic of Turkey (2016), Regulation on Work Permit of Refugees Under Temporary Protection. Ankara: Republic of Turkey.Google Scholar
Research Centre on Asylum and Migration (2013), Report on the activities of non-governmental organisations for Syrian refugees in Turkey. Ankara: IGAM.Google Scholar
Römer, F. (2017), ‘Generous to all or ‘insiders only’? The relationship between welfare state generosity and immigrant welfare rights’, Journal of European Social Policy, 27, 173–196.Google Scholar
Rygiel, K., Baban, F. and Ilcan, S. (2016), ‘The Syrian refugee crisis: the EU-Turkey refugee ‘deal’ and temporary protection’, Global Social Policy, 16, 3, 315–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sainsbury, D. (2006), ‘Immigrants’ social rights in comparative perspective: welfare regimes, forms in immigration and immigration policy regimes’, Journal of European Social Policy, 16, 229–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanchez, R. (2017), ‘Turkey forces aid group Mercy Corps to shut down its operations’, The Telegraph, https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/03/08/turkey-forces-aid-group-mercy-corps-shut-operations/ [accessed 17.03.2017].Google Scholar
Stubbs, P. (2002), ‘Globalisation, memory and welfare regimes in transition: towards an anthropology of transnational policy transfers’, International Journal of Social Welfare, 11, 321–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The AK Party Presidency of Social Policies (2017), ‘Kardeşlik sınır tanımaz: Uluslararası göç ve uyum için sosyal politikalar (Brotherhood has No Borders: Social Policies for International Migration and Harmonization)’, http://www.akparti.org.tr/sosyalpolitikalar/kardeslik_sinir_tanimaz.pdf [accessed 11.07.2017].Google Scholar
The Economist (2017), ‘Turkey is Taking Care of Refugees, but Failing to Integrate Them’, https://www.economist.com/news/europe/21724413-if-syrians-become-permanent-underclass-country-headed-trouble-turkey-taking-care [accessed 11.07.2017].Google Scholar
The Emergency Social Safety Net (2017), https://www.essncard.com/ [accessed 15.10.2017].Google Scholar
The Ministry of Health (2018), ‘Sağlık Bakanlığı, AFAD ve Göç İdaresi Genel Müdürlüğü arasında sağlık hizmeti protokolü (The Health Care Protocol among the Ministry of Health, AFAD and Directorate General of Migration Management), https://dosyamerkez.saglik.gov.tr/Eklenti/19264,afet-ve-acil-durum-yonetimi-baskanligi-goc-idaresi-genel-mudurlugu-ve-saglik-bakanligi-arasinda-goturu-bedel-uzerinden-saglik-hizmeti-alim-protokolu-03072018pdf.pdf?0 [accessed 15.10.2018].Google Scholar
Tumen, S. (2016), ‘The economic impact of Syrian refugees on host countries: quasi-experimental evidence from Turkey’, The American Economic Review, 106, 5, 456–460.Google Scholar
TURKSTAT (2013), ‘Child Labour Force Survey, 2012’, http://www.turkstat.gov.tr/PreHaberBultenleri.do?id=13659 [accessed 29.05.2017].Google Scholar
TURKSTAT (2017), ‘Labour Force Statistics’, http://www.turkstat.gov.tr/PreHaberBultenleri.do?id=24626 [accessed 5.03.2018].Google Scholar
UNHCR (2016), ‘Turkey: UNHCR Operational Update January-June 2016’, http://reporting.unhcr.org/sites/default/files/UNHCR%20Turkey%20Operational%20Update%20-%20Jan-June%202016.pdf [accessed 11.07.2017].Google Scholar
UNICEF (2015), ‘Curriculum, Accreditation, and Certification for Syrian Children in Syria, Turkey, Lebanon, Jordan, Iraq and Egypt’, http://www.oosci-mena.org/uploads/1/wysiwyg/150527_CAC_for_Syrian_children_report_final.pdf [accessed 29.05.2018].Google Scholar
Uyan-Semerci, P. and Erdoğan, E. (2018), ‘Who cannot access education? Difficulties of being a student for children from Syria in Turkey’, Vulnerable Children and Youth Studies, 13, 1, 30–45.Google Scholar
Vogel, J. (1999), ‘The European ‘welfare mix’: institutional configuration and distributive outcome in Sweden and the European Union. A longitudinal and comparative perspective’, Social Indicators, 48, 245–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yalçın, S. (2016), ‘Syrian child workers in Turkey’, Turkish Policy Quarterly, http://turkishpolicy.com/article/831/syrian-child-workers-in-turkey [accessed 29.05.2018].Google Scholar
Yentürk, N. (2013), ‘Türkiye’de yoksullara yönelik harcamalar’ (Expenditures for the poor in Turkey), METU Studies in Development, 40, 2, 433–464.Google Scholar
Yıldırım, H.H. and Yıldırım, T. (2011) ‘Healthcare financing reform in Turkey: context and salient features’, Journal of European Social Policy, 21, 2, 178–193.Google Scholar
Yıldız, A. and Uzgören, E. (2016), ‘Limits to temporary protection: non-camp Syrian refugees in İzmir, Turkey’, Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 16, 2, 195–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yılmaz, V. (2012), Türkiye’de ruh sağlığı politikaları: Tespitler ve öneriler (Mental Health Policies in Turkey: Problems and Recommendations), Istanbul: Human Rights in Mental Health Initiative (RUSIHAK).Google Scholar
Zetter, R. (2007), ‘More labels, fewer refugees: remaking the refugee label in an era of globalization’, Journal of Refugee Studies, 20, 2, 172–192.Google Scholar