Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T09:43:09.541Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Erzsébet Bukodi and John H. Goldthorpe (2018), Social Mobility and Education in Britain: Research, Politics and Policy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, £19.99, pp. 260, pbk.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2019

JAKE ANDERS
JAKE ANDERS*
Affiliation:
UCL Institute of Education, University College Londonjake.anders@ucl.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 49 , Issue 1 , January 2020 , pp. 229 - 231
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blanden, J., Gregg, P. and Macmillan, L. (2013), Intergenerational persistence in income and social class: the effect of within-group inequality, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 176: 541–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanden, J., Goodman, A., Gregg, P. and Machin, S. (2004), Changes in intergenerational mobility in Britain, in Corak, M. (ed.), Generational Income Mobility in North America and Europe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 122–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Exley, D. (2019), The End of Aspiration? Social Mobility and Our Children’s Fading Prospects, Bristol: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laurison, D. and Friedman, S. (2016), The class pay gap in higher professional and managerial occupations, American Sociological Review, 81(4): 668–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar