Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Facilitating User Involvement in Activation Programmes: When Carers and Clerks Meet Pawns and Queens

  • ANNE BRITT DJUVE (a1) and HANNE C. KAVLI (a2)

Abstract

User involvement has become an explicit goal within social service provision. Even so, the term remains ambiguous, and its implementation troublesome. Implementation theory lists a number of factors influencing bureaucratic behaviour; in this paper we investigate the ‘human factor’. Our ambition is to provide a framework for analysis of user influence in activation programmes that includes the individual characteristics of both service users and service providers. Building on theoretical insights from the literature on activation and agency, we develop a framework that distinguishes between two ideal types of service users: Pawns and Queens, and two types of service providers: care-oriented Carers and rule-oriented Clerks. This framework is then applied to identify key challenges for the interaction between users and caseworkers in two challenging situations: when service users express little or no agency and when they express agency that is incompatible with the overall goals of the programme. We find that Carers show pronounced reluctance to overrule the choices made by service users even when they have conflicting views – and tend to postpone decisions when they interact with Pawns. Clerks tend to overrule the decisions of Queens when they have conflicting views, and to make decisions on behalf of Pawns. The analysis draws on data collected from 126 qualitative interviews with service providers and participants in the Norwegian Introductory Programme for immigrants and a survey of 320 caseworkers.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Facilitating User Involvement in Activation Programmes: When Carers and Clerks Meet Pawns and Queens
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Facilitating User Involvement in Activation Programmes: When Carers and Clerks Meet Pawns and Queens
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Facilitating User Involvement in Activation Programmes: When Carers and Clerks Meet Pawns and Queens
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

References

Hide All
Arnstein, S. R. (1969), ‘A ladder of citizen participation’,Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35: 4, 216224.
Bloom, H., Hill, C. and Riccio, J. (2003), ‘Linking program implementation and effectiveness: lessons from a pooled sample of welfare-to-work experiments’, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 22: 4, 551575.
Boehm, A. and Staples, L. H. (2002), ‘The functions of the social worker in empowering: the voices of consumers and professionals’, Social Work, 47: 449460.
Brochmann, G. and Djuve, A. B. (2013), ‘Multiculturalism or assimilation? The Norwegian welfare state approach’, in Kivisto, Peter and Wahlbeck, Östen (eds.), Debating Multiculturalism in the Nordic Welfare States, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Brodkin, E. Z. (1997), ‘Inside the welfare contract: discretion and accountability in state welfare administration’, Social Service Review, 71: 1, 133.
Dean, H. (2003a), ‘The third way and social welfare: the myth of post-emotionalism’, Social Policy and Administration, 7: 695708.
Dean, H. (2003b), ‘Re-conceptualising welfare-to-work for people with multiple problems and needs’, Journal of Social Policy, 32: 3, 441459.
Dean, H. (2007), ‘The ethics of welfare-to-work’, Policy and Politics, 35: 4, 573590.
Djuve, A. B. (2010), ‘Empowerment or intrusion? The input and output legitimacy of introductory programmes for recent immigrants’, Journal of International Migration and Integration, 11: 4, 403422.
Djuve, A. B. (2011), ‘Introductory programmes for immigrants: liberalism revisited, or changing ideas of citizenship?’, Nordic Journal of Migration Research, 1: 3, 113125.
Djuve, A. B. and Kavli, H. C. (2006), ‘Velferdsstatens skreddere: Skjønn og brukermedvirkning i flyktningetjenesten’, Tidsskrift for velferdsforskning 2006/4.
Djuve, A. B., Kavli, H. C. and Hagelund, A. (2011), Kvinner i kvalifisering: Introduksjonsprogram for nyankomne flyktninger med liten utdanning og store omsorgsoppgaver, Fafo-rapport 2011: 02.
Duncan, S. and Edwards, R. (1999), Lone Parents, Paid Work and Gendered Moral Rationalities, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Eriksen, E. O. (2001), Demokratiets sorte hull: Om spenningen mellom fag og politikk, Oslo: Abstrakt forlag.
Hasenfeld, Y. (1999), ‘Social services and welfare-to-work: prospects for the social work profession’,Administration in Social Work, 23: 3, 185199.
Hagelund, A. (2005), ‘Why it is bad to be kind: educating refugees to a life in the welfare states a case study from Norway’, Social Policy and Administration, 39: 6, 669683.
Jensen, P. H. and Pfau-Effinger, B. (2005), ‘Active citizenship: the new face of welfare’, in Andersen, A., Guilllemard, M., Jensen, P. H. and Pfau-Effinger, B. (eds.), The Changing Face of Welfare, Bristol: The Policy Press.
Jewell, C. (2007), Agents of the Welfare State: How Caseworkers Respond to Need in the United States, Germany and Sweden, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Jordan, B., Stråth, B. and Triandafyllidou, A. (2003), ‘Comparing cultures of discretion’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 29: 2, 373395.
Kavli, H. C., Nielsen, R. A. and Sandbæk, M. L. (2010), ‘HYPERLINK “http://www.fafo.no/pub/rapp/20176/index.html” Stønadsordningen for enslige forsørgere’, Hvordan fungerer den for mottakere med innvandringsbakgrunn? Fafo-report 2010: 32.
Kavli, H. C., Hagelund, A. and Bråthen, M. (2007), Med rett til å lære og plikt til å delta: En evaluering av introduksjonsordningen for nyankomne flyktninger og innvandrere, Fafo-rapport 2007: 34
Le Grand, J. (2003/2006), Motivation, Agency and Public Policy: Of Knights and Knaves, Pawns and Queens, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lipsky, M. (1980), Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services, New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Loyens, K. and Maesschalck, J. (2010), ‘Toward a theoretical framework for ethical decision making of street-level bureaucracy: existing models reconsidered’, Administration and Society, 42: I, 66100.
Marston, G., Larsen, J. and McDonald, C. (2005), ‘The active subjects of welfare reform: a street-level comparison of employment services in Australia and Denmark’, Social Work and Society, 3: 2, 141158.
May, P. and Winter, S. (2007), ‘Politicians, managers, and street-level bureaucrats: influences on policy implementation’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19: 3, 453476.
Minas, R. (2009), Activation in Integrated Services? Bridging Social and Employment Services in European Countries, Working paper 2009:11, Stockholm: Institute for Future Studies.
Ministry of Children, Equality and Social Inclusion (2003), The Introduction Act 2003 (LOV-2003-07-04-80), The Act on an Introduction Programme and Norwegian Language Training for Newly Arrived Immigrants, http://www.ub.uio.no/ujur/ulovdata/lov-20030704-080-eng.pdf.
Official Norwegian Report 2011: 7 (NOU), Welfare and Migration: The Future of the Nordic Model, Report submitted to the Ministry of Children, Equality and Social Inclusion, http://www.regjeringen.no/pages/16413697/nou_2011_7_perspective_andsummary.pdf
Olsen, B. (2014), ‘Flyktninger og arbeidsmarkedet, 4 kvartal 2012’, Rapporter 2014/6, Oslo: Statistics Norway.
Proposition to the Odelsting nr.28 (2002–2003), Om lov om introduksjonsordning for nyankomne innvandrere (introduksjonsloven), http://www.regjeringen.no/en/dep/asd/doc/regpubl/otprp/20022003/otprp-nr-28-2002-2003-.html?id=171771.
Sandbæk, M. L. (2011), ‘Voksne innvandrere i Norskopplæringen: Brukerundersøkelser i Basis og Helsefagarbeideropplæringen’, Fafo-notat 2011:03, Oslo: Fafo.
Sainsbury, R. (2008), ‘Administrative justice, discretion and the “welfare to work” project’, Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 30: 4, 323328.
Small, N. (2000), ‘The changing National Health Service: user involvement and palliative care’, in Small, N. and Rhodes, P. (eds.), Too Ill to Talk: User Involvement in Palliative Care, London: Routledge.
Statistics Norway (2014), Innvandrere og norskfødte med innvandrerforeldre, 1 January 2014, Publisert: 24 April 2014.
Taylor-Gooby, P. (2005), ‘Ideas and policy change’, in Taylor-Gooby, P. (ed.), Ideas and Welfare State Reform in Europe, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Terum, L. I. (2003), Portvakt i velferdsstaten: Om skjønn og beslutninger i sosialt arbeid, Oslo: Kommuneforlaget.
Van Berkel, R. (2007), ‘Individualized activation in the EU’, in Van Berkel, R. and Valkenburg, B. (eds.), Making It Personal, Bristol: The Policy Press.
Van Berkel, R. and Van der Aa, P. (2012), ‘Activation work: policy programme administration or professional service provision?’, Journal of Social Policy, 41: 4, 493510.
Van Meter, D. and Van Horn, C. E. (1975), ‘The policy implementation process: a conceptual framework’, Administration and Society, 6: 4, 445488.
Weber, M. (1920/1978), Economy and Society, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Wright, S. (2012), ‘Welfare-to-work, agency and personal responsibility’, Journal of Social Policy, 41: 2, 309328.

Facilitating User Involvement in Activation Programmes: When Carers and Clerks Meet Pawns and Queens

  • ANNE BRITT DJUVE (a1) and HANNE C. KAVLI (a2)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed