Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Identifying Key Barriers to Unemployment Insurance for Disadvantaged Workers in the United States

  • H. LUKE SHAEFER (a1)

This article seeks to identify key programmatic barriers to access to Unemployment Insurance (UI) faced by two groups of disadvantaged workers in the United States: those in the lowest wage quintile, and part-time workers who are primary wage earners. Analyses use the 2001 Panel of the Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP), a nationally representative, longitudinal survey administered by the United States Census Bureau. Estimates of UI eligibility and receipt are presented for those who enter a spell of unemployment during the panel. Results suggest that a large majority of disadvantaged workers in the United States already meet UI earnings (monetary) requirements, and that barriers to access are more often the result of disadvantaged workers (1) assuming they are ineligible, or (2) not meeting non-monetary eligibility requirements because they voluntarily quit their job or were terminated for cause. Much of the focus in policy debates in the United States remains on reforming UI earnings requirements. If results presented in this article are correct, increasing UI access among disadvantaged workers will further require increasing rates of application through expanded knowledge about the programme among disadvantaged workers, and expanding (non-monetary) eligibility for job leavers.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

L. J. Bassi and D. P. McMurrer (1997), ‘Coverage and recipiency: trends and effects’, in C. J. O'Leary and S. A. Wandner (eds.), Unemployment Insurance in the United States: Analysis of Policy Issues, Kalamazoo, MI: The W. E. Upjohn Institute, pp. 5190.

H. Boushey and J. B. Wenger (2006), ‘Unemployment insurance eligibility before and after welfare reform’, Journal of Poverty, 10: 3, 123.

C. K. G. Decker and P. B. Levine (2001), ‘Less skilled workers, welfare reform, and the unemployment insurance system’, Research in Labor Economics, 20: 395432.

A. L. Kalleberg , B. F. Reskin and K. Hudson (2000) ‘Bad jobs in America: standard and nonstandard employment relations and job quality in the United States’, American Sociological Review, 65: 256–78.

S. J. Lambert (2008), ‘Passing the buck: labor flexibility practices that transfer risk onto hourly workers’, Human Relations, 61: 9, 1203–27.

J. R. Storey and J. A. Neisner (1997), ‘Unemployment compensation in the Group of Seven nations’, in C. J. O'Leary and S. A. Wandner (eds.), Unemployment Insurance in the United States: Analysis of Policy Issues, Kalamazoo, MI: The W. E. Upjohn Institute, pp. 599667.

W. Vroman and V. Brusentsev (2005), Unemployment Compensation throughout the World: A Comparative Analysis, Kalamazoo, MI: The W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Social Policy
  • ISSN: 0047-2794
  • EISSN: 1469-7823
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-social-policy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 3
Total number of PDF views: 28 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 162 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 28th June 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.