Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 9
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Donoghue, Matthew 2013. Welfare and cohesion contested: A critical discourse analysis of New Labour's reform programme. British Politics, Vol. 8, Issue. 1, p. 79.

    GLASSNER, Vera and KEUNE, Maarten 2012. La crisis y la política social: el papel de los convenios colectivos. Revista Internacional del Trabajo, Vol. 131, Issue. 4, p. 385.

    GLASSNER, Vera and KEUNE, Maarten 2012. Crise et politique sociale: le rôle des accords collectifs. Revue internationale du Travail, Vol. 151, Issue. 4, p. 383.

    GLASSNER, Vera and KEUNE, Maarten 2012. The crisis and social policy: The role of collective agreements. International Labour Review, Vol. 151, Issue. 4, p. 351.

    Martin, Cathie Jo and Knudsen, Jette Steen 2010. Scenes from a mall: Retail training and the social exclusion of low-skilled workers. Regulation & Governance, Vol. 4, Issue. 3, p. 345.

    Bridgen, Paul and Meyer, Traute 2009. The Politics of Occupational Pension Reform in Britain and the Netherlands: The Power of Market Discipline in Liberal and Corporatist Regimes. West European Politics, Vol. 32, Issue. 3, p. 586.

    Trampusch, Christine 2009. Collective agreements on pensions as a source of solidarity. Journal of Comparative Social Welfare, Vol. 25, Issue. 2, p. 99.

    Hyde, Mark and Dixon, John 2008. A comparative analysis of mandated private pension arrangements. International Journal of Social Economics, Vol. 35, Issue. 1/2, p. 49.

    Trampusch, Christine 2007. Industrial Relations as a Source of Social Policy: A Typology of the Institutional Conditions for Industrial Agreements on Social Benefits. Social Policy & Administration, Vol. 41, Issue. 3, p. 251.


Industrial Relations as a Source of Solidarity in Times of Welfare State Retrenchment

  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 April 2007

Within the literature on retrenchment policies, the ‘solidarity-decline thesis’ is discussed. It is argued that current welfare state restructuring leads to a decrease in the actual social cohesion of society because redistributive public benefits are cut. The article addresses this thesis by presenting empirical evidence on social security based on collective bargaining. In Denmark, France, Germany and the Netherlands, collective agreements are increasingly used to regulate and finance social benefits. These collectively negotiated benefits may compensate to a certain degree for solidarity losses caused by retrenchment policies. The article reviews concepts of solidarity used in the literature and develops a two-dimensional scheme of four different concepts. The conclusion for comparative welfare state research is twofold. First, when viewing policies of welfare state retrenchment, the research should systematically include industrial relations in its frame of reference. Second, further studies should analyse the politics as well as the outcomes of collectively negotiated benefits more systematically. Under certain conditions, which are worth specifying, collective bargaining may lead to complex public–private mixes that shift welfare states in other directions than outright market liberalisation, not only in factual but also in normative terms.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Social Policy
  • ISSN: 0047-2794
  • EISSN: 1469-7823
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-social-policy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *