Skip to main content
×
Home

Integrating Welfare and Production Typologies: How Refinements of the Varieties of Capitalism Approach call for a Combination of Welfare Typologies

  • MARTIN SCHRÖDER (a1)
Abstract
Abstract

This article argues that existing typologies on production and welfare regimes should be combined into a typology unifying the study of production and distribution in advanced capitalist countries. The article utilises a principal component and cluster analysis to show that such a typology indeed reflects the empirical diversity of countries. This is further illustrated by a brief literature review of different typologies. It is then shown how the integration of the two approaches helps to resolve problems addressed in the new literature on the varieties of capitalism approach, notably how welfare arrangements relate to production systems. Thereby, the relevance of an integrated typology for policy-makers in the fields of welfare and production will be illustrated. Lastly, some thoughts follow on how an integrated typology allows for a perspective that explains the development of various welfare and production regimes based on the common historical heritage of families of nations.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Albert M. (1992), Kapitalismus contra Kapitalismus, Frankfurt/Main: Campus.
Allan J. P. and Scruggs L. (2004), ‘Political partisanship and welfare state reform in advanced industrial societies’, American Journal of Political Science, 48: 496512, http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~scruggs/ajpspaper.pdf
Amable B. (2003), The Diversity of Modern Capitalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Becker U. (2007), ‘Open systemness and contested reference frames and change: a reformulation of the varieties of capitalism theory’, Socio-Economic Review, 5: 261–86.
Botero J., Djankov S., Porta R. and Lopez-De-Silanes F. C. (2004), ‘The regulation of labor’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119: 1339–82.
Boyer R. (2004a), ‘How and why capitalisms differ’, MPIfG Discussion Paper 02/5, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, Cologne, www.mpifg.de/pu/mpifg_dp/dp05-4.pdf
Boyer R. (2004b), Théorie de la régulation. Les fondamentaux, Paris: La Découverte.
Boyer R. (2004c), Une théorie du capitalisme est-elle possible?, Paris: Odile Jacob.
Cerny P. (1997), ‘International finance and the erosion of capitalist diversity’, in Crouch C. and Streeck W. (eds.), Political Economy of Modern Capitalism: Mapping Convergence and Diversity, London: Sage, pp. 173–81.
Cerny P., Menz G. and Soederberg S. (eds.) (2005), Internalizing Globalization: The Rise of Neoliberalism and the Decline of National Varieties of Capitalism, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Crouch C. (2005a), Capitalist Diversity and Change: Recombinant Governance and Institutional Entrepreneurs, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Crouch C. (2005b), ‘Models of capitalism’, New Political Economy, 10: 439–56.
Crouch C. and Streeck W. (eds) (1997), Political Economy of Modern Capitalism: Mapping Convergence and Diversity, London: Sage.
Deeg R. and Jackson G. (2006), ‘How many varieties of capitalism? Comparing the comparative institutional analyses of capitalist diversity’, MPIfG Discussion Paper 06/2, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, Cologne, www.mpifg.de/pu/mpifg_dp/dp06-2.pdf.
Deeg R. and Jackson G. (2007), ‘Towards a more dynamic theory of capitalist variety’, Socio-Economic Review, 5: 149–79.
Dobbin F. (1994), Forging Industrial Policy: The United States, Britain, and France in the Railway Age, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dunteman G. H. (1989), Principal Components Analysis, Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, Newbury Park: Sage.
Ebbinghaus B. (1999), ‘Does a European social model exist and can it survive?’, in Huemer G., Mesch M. and Traxler F. (eds), The Role of Employer Associations and Labour Unions in the EMU: Institutional Requirements for European Economic Policies, Aldershot: Ashgate.
Ebbinghaus B. (2001), ‘When labour and capital collude: the political economy of early retirement in Europe, Japan and the USA’, in Ebbinghaus B. and Manow P. (eds), Varieties of Welfare Capitalism, London: Routledge.
Esping-Andersen G. (1990), The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Esping-Andersen G. (1999), Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies, New York: Oxford University Press.
Estevez-Abe M., Iversen T. and Soskice D. (2001), ‘Social protection and the formation of skills: a reinterpretation of the welfare state’, in Hall P. A. and Soskice D. (eds.), Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ferrera M. (1996), ‘The “southern model” of welfare in social Europe’, Journal of European Social Policy, 6: 1737.
Fligstein N. (2001), The Architecture of Markets, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Gough I., Bradshaw J., Ditch J., Eardley T. and Whiteford P. (1997), ‘Social assistance in OECD countries’, Journal of European Social Policy, 7: 1743.
Hall P. (2001), ‘Organized market economies and unemployment in Europe: is it finally time to accept liberal orthodoxy?’, in Bermeo N. (ed), Unemployment in the New Europe, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hall P. (2006), ‘Stabilität und Wandel in den Spielarten des Kapitalismus’, in Beckert J., Ebbinghaus B., Hassel A. and Manow P. (eds), Transformationen des Kapitalismus, Frankfurt/Main: Campus.
Hall P. (2007), ‘The evolution of varieties of capitalism in Europe’, in Hancké B., Rhodes M. and Thatcher M. (ed), Beyond Varieties of Capitalism: Conflict, Contradictions and Complementarities in the European Economy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hall P. and Gingerich D. (2004), ‘Varieties of capitalism and institutional complementarities in the macroeconomy: an empirical analysis’, MPIfG Discussion Paper 04/5, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, Cologne, http://www.mpifg.de/pu/mpifg_dp/dp04-5.pdf.
Hall P. and Soskice D. (2001a), ‘An introduction to varieties of capitalism’, in Hall P. and Soskice D. (eds), Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hall P. and Soskice D. (eds) (2001b), Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hancké B., Rhodes M. and Thatcher M. (2007), ‘Introduction: beyond varieties of capitalism’, in Hancké B., Rhodes M. and Thatcher M. (eds), Beyond Varieties of Capitalism: Conflict, Contradictions and Complementarities in the European Economy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Iversen T. and Soskice D. (2006), ‘Electoral institutions and the politics of coalitions: why some democracies redistribute more than others’, American Political Science Review, 100: 165–81.
Jolliffe I. T. (2002), Principal Component Analysis, Berlin: Springer.
Kasza G., J. (2002), ‘The illusion of welfare “regimes”’, Journal of Social Policy, 31: 271–87.
Katzenstein P. (1985), Small States in World Markets, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
King D. and Wood S. (1999), ‘The political economy of neoliberalism: Britain and the United States in the 1980s’, in Kitschelt H., Lange P., Marks G. and Stephens J. D. (eds), Continuity and Change in Contemporary Capitalism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 371–97.
Korpi W. (1985), ‘Power resources approach vs. action and conflict: on causal and intentional explanations in the study of power’, Sociological Theory, 3: 3145.
Korpi W. (2006), ‘Power-resources and employer-centered approaches in explanations of welfare states and varities of capitalism’, ESPAnet Conference, Bremen (21.-23.9.2006).
Lehmbruch G. (2001), ‘The institutional embedding of market economies: the German “model” and its impact on Japan’, in Streeck W. and Yamamura K. (eds), The Origins of Nonliberal Capitalism, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Lehmbruch G. and Schmitter P. (1979), Trends toward Corporatist Intermediation, Beverly Hills: Sage.
Lehmbruch G. and Schmitter P. (1982), Patterns of Corporatist Policy-Making, Beverly Hills: Sage.
Leibfried S. (1992), ‘Towards a European welfare state? On integrating poverty regimes into the European Community’, in Ferge Z. and Kolberg J. E. (eds), Social Policy in a Changing Europe, Frankfurt/Main: Campus-Westview.
Lessenich S. (1994), ‘Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism – oder vier? Strukturwandel arbeits- und sozialpolitischer Regulierungsmuster in Spanien’, Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 35: 224–44.
Levine R. (2000), ‘Bank-based or market-based financial systems: which is better?’, Minneapolis: Finance Department Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota, www.bus.umich.edu/KresgeLibrary/Collections/Workingpapers/wdi/wp442.pdf.
Manow P. (2001a), ‘Business coordination, wage bargaining and the welfare state. Germany and Japan in comparative historical perspective’, in Ebbinghaus B. and Manow P. (eds), Varieties of Welfare Capitalism, London: Routledge, pp. 2751.
Manow P. (2001b), ‘Comparative institutional advantages of welfare state regimes and new coalitions in welfare state reforms’, in Pierson P. (ed), The New Politics of the Welfare State, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mares I. (2001a), ‘Firms and the welfare state: when, why, and how does social policy matter to employers?’, in Hall P. and Soskice D. (eds), Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mares I. (2001b), ‘Strategic bargaining and social policy development: unemployment insurance in France and Germany’, in Ebbinghaus B. and Manow P. (eds), Varieties of Welfare Capitalism, London: Routledge.
Martin C. and Swank D. (2001), ‘Employers and the welfare state: the political economic organization of firms and social policy in contemporary capitalist democracies’, Comparative Political Studies, 34: 889923.
OECD (2003), Survey of Corporate Governance Developments in OECD Countries, Paris: Organisation for Economic Development and Cooperation, www.oecd.org/dataoecd/58/27/21755678.pdf.
OECD (2004), Employment Outlook 2004, Paris: Organisation for Economic Development and Cooperation.
OECD (2005a), Employment Outlook 2005, Paris: Organisation for Economic Development and Cooperation.
OECD (2005b), OECD in Figures 2005, Paris: Organisation for Economic Development and Cooperation, www.oecd.org/document/62/0,2340,en_2649_34489_2345918_1_1_1_1,00.html.
OECD (2005c), Pensions at a Glance: Public Policies Across OECD Countries, Paris: Organisation for Economic Development and Cooperation.
OECD (2006), OECD Factbook 2006, Paris: Organisation for Economic Development and Cooperation, titania.sourceoecd.org/vl = 2492909/cl = 11/nw = 1/rpsv/factbook.
Porta R. et al. (2004), ‘The regulation of labor’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119: 1339–82.
Rothstein B. (1998), Just Institutions Matter: The Moral and Political Logic of the Universal Welfare State, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Scharpf F. (1999), ‘The viability of advanced welfare states in the international economy: vulnerabilities and options’, MPIfG Working Paper 99/9, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, Cologne, www.mpi-fg-koeln.mpg.de/pu/workpap/wp99-9/wp99-9.html.
Scharpf F. and Schmidt V. (eds) (2000a), Welfare and Work in the Open Economy, Vol. I: From Vulnerability to Competitiveness, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Scharpf F. and Schmidt V. (eds) (2000b), Welfare and Work in the Open Economy, Vol. II: Diverse Responses to Common Challenges, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schmidt V. (2000), ‘Still three models of capitalism? The dynamics of economic adjustment in Britain, Germany and France’, in Czada R. and Lütz S. (eds), Die politische Konstitution von Märkten, Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
Schmidt V. (2002), The Futures of European Capitalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Shonfield A. (1969), Modern Capitalism, New York: Oxford University Press.
Soskice D. (2007), ‘Macroeconomics and varieties of capitalism’, in Hancké B., Rhodes M. and Thatcher M. (eds), Beyond Varieties of Capitalism: Conflict, Contradictions and Complementarities in the European Economy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Soskice D. and Iversen T. (2001), ‘An asset theory of social policy preferences’, American Political Science Review, 95: 875–93.
Swenson P. (2002), Capitalists Against Markets: The Making of Labor Markets and Welfare States in the United States and Sweden, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Thelen K. (2000), ‘Why German employers cannot bring themselves to dismantle the German model’, in Iversen T., Pontusson J. and Soskice D. (eds), Unions, Employers and Central Banks, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vitols S. (2001), ‘The origins of bank-based and market-based financial systems: Germany, Japan and the United States’, in Streeck W. and Yamamura K. (eds), The Origins of Nonliberal Capitalism. Germany and Japan in Comparison, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Vogel S. (2001), ‘The crisis of German and Japanese capitalism: stalled on the road to the liberal market model?’, Comparative Political Studies, 34: 1103–33.
Weber M. (1988 [1904]), Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Religionssoziologie, Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr.
Whitley R. (1999), Divergent Capitalisms: The Social Structuring and Change of Business Systems, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wood S. (2001), ‘Labour market regimes under threat? Sources of continuity and change in Germany, Britain and Sweden’, in Pierson P. (ed), The New Politics of the Welfare State, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
World Bank (2006), World Development Indicators, Washington: World Bank, go.worldbank. org/RVW6YTLQH0.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Social Policy
  • ISSN: 0047-2794
  • EISSN: 1469-7823
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-social-policy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 5
Total number of PDF views: 166 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 380 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 23rd November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.