Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Measuring Subjective Wellbeing: Recommendations on Measures for use by National Governments

  • PAUL DOLAN (a1) and ROBERT METCALFE (a2)
Abstract

Governments around the world are now beginning to seriously consider the use of measures of subjective wellbeing (SWB) – ratings of thoughts and feelings about life – for monitoring progress and for informing and appraising public policy. The mental state account of wellbeing upon which SWB measures are based can provide useful additional information about who is doing well and badly in life when compared to that provided by the objective list and preference satisfaction accounts. It may be particularly useful when deciding how best to allocate scarce resources, where it is desirable to express the benefits of intervention in a single metric that can be compared to the costs of intervention. There are three main concepts of SWB in the literature – evaluation (life satisfaction), experience (momentary mood) and eudemonia (purpose) – and policy-makers should seek to measure all three, at least for the purposes of monitoring progress. There are some major challenges to the use of SWB measures. Two related and well-rehearsed issues are the effects of expectations and adaptation on ratings. The degree to which we should allow wellbeing to vary according to expectations and adaptation are vexing moral problems but information on SWB can highlight what difference allowing for these considerations would have in practice (e.g. in informing prioiritisation decisions), which can then be fed into the normative debate. There are also questions about precisely what attention should be drawn to in SWB questions and how to capture the ratings of those least inclined to take part in surveys, but these can be addressed through more widespread use of SWB. We also provide some concrete recommendations about precisely what questions should be asked in large-scale surveys, and these recommendations have been taken up by the Office of National Statistics in the UK and are being looked at closely by the OECD.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Anand, P. and Van Hees, M. (2006), ‘Capabilities and achievements: an empirical study’, Journal of Socio-Economics, 35: 268–84.
Bentham, J. (1996/1789), An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, Burns, J. H. and Hart, H. L. A. (eds.), Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Blanchflower, D. (2009), ‘International evidence on well-being’, in Krueger, A.B. (ed.), National Time Accounting and Subjective Well-Being, NBER and University of Chicago Press.
Bok, D. C. (2010), The Politics of Happiness, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Bowles, S. (1998), ‘Endogenous preferences: the cultural consequences of markets and other economic institutions’, Journal of Economic Literature, 36: 75111.
Bradburn, N. M. (1969), The Structure of Psychological Well-Being, Chicago: Aldine.
Bradford, D. and Dolan, P. (2010), ‘Getting used to it: the adaptive global utility model’, Journal of Health Economics, 29: 811820.
Burchardt, T. (2005), ‘Are one man's rags another man's richers? Identifying adaptive expectations using panel data’, Social Indicators Research, 74: 57102.
Calvo, E., Haverstick, K. and Sass, S. A. (2007), ‘What makes retirees happier: a gradual or “cold turkey” retirement?’, WP Center for Retirement Research at Boston College, n.18.
Cantril, H. (1965), The Patterns of Human Concern, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Clark, A. (2010), ‘Work, jobs and well-being across the millennium’, in Diener, E., Helliwell, J. and Kahneman, D. (eds.), International Differences in Well-Being, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Clark, A., Diener, E., Georgellis, Y. and Lucas, R. (2004), ‘Unemployment alters the set-point for life satisfaction’, Psychological Science, 15: 813.
Clark, A. E. and Oswald, A. J. (1996), ‘Satisfaction and comparison income’, Journal of Public Economics, 61: 359–81.
Clark, D. A. (2009), ‘Adaptation, poverty and well‐being: some issues and observations with special reference to the capability approach and development studies’, Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 10: 2142.
Cooper, A. and Lousada, J. (2005), Borderline Welfare: Feeling and the Fear of Feeling in Modern Welfare, London: Karnac.
Crafts, N. (2005), ‘The contribution of increased life expectancy to the growth of living standards in the UK, 1987–2001’, February, London School of Economics.
Crisp, R. (2006), ‘Hedonism reconsidered’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 73: 619–45.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. and Hunter, J. (2003), ‘Happiness in everyday life: the uses of experience sampling’, Journal of Happiness Research, 4: 185–99.
Deci, E. L. and Ryan, R. M. (2008), ‘Hedonia, eudaimonia, and wellbeing: an introduction’, Journal of Happiness Studies, 9: 111.
Dean, H. (2009), ‘Critiquing capabilities: the distractions of a beguiling concept’, Critical Social Policy, 29: 261–78.
Diener, E. and Emmons, R. A. (1984), ‘The independence of positive and negative affect’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47: 1105–17.
Diener, E., Lucas, R. E. and Scollon, C. N. (2006), ‘Beyond the hedonic treadmill: revising the adaptation theory of well-being’, American Psychologist, 61: 305–14.
Diener, E., Ng, W., Harter, J. and Arora, R. (2010), ‘Wealth and happiness across the world: material prosperity predicts life evaluation, whereas psychosocial prosperity predicts positive feeling’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99: 5261.
Dolan, P. (2011), ‘Thinking about it: thoughts about health and valuing QALYs’, Health Economics, 20: 14071416.
Dolan, P., Fujiwara, D. and Metcalfe, R. (2011), ‘A step towards valuing utility the marginal and cardinal way’, LSE CEP Discussion Paper No. 1062, London School of Economics.
Dolan, P. and Kahneman, D. (2008), ‘Interpretations of utility and their implications for the valuation of health’, Economic Journal, 118: 215–34.
Dolan, P., Lee, H. and Peasgood, T. (forthcoming), ‘Losing sight of the wood for the trees: some issues in describing and valuing health and another possible approach’, Pharmacoeconomics.
Dolan, P. and Metcalfe, R. (2008), ‘Comparing willingness-to-pay and subjective well-being in the context of non-market goods’, LSE CEP Discussion Paper No. 0890, London School of Economics.
Dolan, P. and Metcalfe, R. (2010), ‘“Oops . . . I did it again”: repeated focusing effects in reports of happiness’, Journal of Economic Psychology, 31: 732–7.
Dolan, P. and Peasgood, T. (2008), ‘Measuring well-being for public policy: preferences or experiences?’, Journal of Legal Studies, 37: S5S31.
Dolan, P., Peasgood, T. and White, M. P. (2006), Review of Research on the Influences on Personal Wellbeing and Application to Policy, London: Defra.
Dolan, P., Peasgood, T. and White, M. P. (2008), ‘Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective wellbeing’, Journal of Economic Psychology, 29: 94122.
Dolan, P. and White, M. P. (2007), ‘How can measures of subjective well-being be used to inform public policy?’, Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2: 7185.
Donovan, N. and Halpern, D. (2002), Life Satisfaction: The State of Knowledge and Implications for Government, London: Prime Minister's Strategy Unit.
Duncan, G. (2005), ‘What do we mean by “happiness”? The relevance of subjective wellbeing to social policy’, Social Policy Journal of New Zealand, 25: 1631.
Edwards, C. and Imrie, R. (2008), ‘Disability and the implications of the wellbeing agenda: some reflections from the United Kingdom’, Journal of Social Policy, 37: 337–55.
Elster, J. (1983), Sour Grapes: Studies in the Subversion of Rationality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Freeman, R. (1978), ‘Job satisfaction as an economic variable’, American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 68: 135–41.
Frey, B. and Stutzer, A. (2002), Happiness and Economics: How the Economy and Institutions Affect Human Well-Being, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Frick, J. R., Goebel, J., Schechtman, E., Wagner, G. G. and Yitzhaki, S. (2006), ‘Using Analysis of Gini (ANoGi) for detecting whether two sub-samples represent the same universe: the German Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP) experience’, Sociological Methods and Research, 3: 427–68.
Friedli, L. and Parsonage, M. (2007), Mental Health Promotion: Building an Economic Case, Northern IrelandAssociation for Mental Health.
Fujita, F. and Diener, E. (2005), ‘Life satisfaction set point: stability and change’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88: 158–64.
Gilbert, D. T., Pinel, E. C., Wilson, T. D., Blumberg, S. J. and Wheatley, T. (1998), ‘Immune neglect: a source of durability bias in affective forecasting’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75: 617–38.
Graham, C. (2010), ‘The challenges of incorporating empowerment into the HDI: some lessons from happiness economics and quality of life research’, United Nations Development Programme Human Development Reports Research Paper 2010/13.
Graham, C. and Pettinato, S. (2002), Happiness and Hardship: Opportunity and Insecurity in New Market Economies, Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution Press.
Greener, I. and Powell, M. (2009), ‘The evolution of choice policies in UK Housing, education and health policy’, Journal of Social Policy, 38: 6381.
Griffin, J. (1986), Well-being: Its meaning, Measurement and Moral Importance, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Gruber, J. and Mullainathan, S. (2005), ‘Do cigarette taxes make smokers happier?’, B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy. 5: article 4.
Halpern, D. (2010), The Hidden Wealth of Nations, Cambridge: Polity.
Harsanyi, J. C. (1997), ‘Utilities, preferences, and substantive goods’, Social Choice and Welfare, 14: 129–45.
Hastings, D. A. (2009), ‘Filling gaps in the human development index: findings from Asia and the Pacific’, UNESCAP Working Paper 09/02.
Haybron, D. (2008), ‘Philosophy and the science of subjective well-being’, in Eid, M. and Larsen, R. J. (eds.), The Science of Subjective Well-Being, New York: Guilford Press, pp. 1743.
Helliwell, J. (2008), ‘Life satisfaction and quality of development’, NBER Working Paper No. 14507.
Treasury, HM (2003), The Green Book: Appraisal and Evaluation in Central Government, London: The Stationary Office.
Treasury, HM (2008), Developments in the Economics of Well-Being, Treasury Economic Working Paper 4, J. Lepper and S. McAndrew, London: HM Treasury.
Treasury, HM (2010), Budget 2010, London: HM Treasury.
Treasury, HM (2011), Valuation Techniques for Social Cost–Benefit Analysis: Stated Preference, Revealed Preference and Subjective Well-Being Approaches, A Discussion of the Current Issues, London: HM Treasury.
Huppert, F. A. (2009), ‘Psychological well-being: evidence regarding its causes and consequences’, Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 1: 137–64.
Huppert, F. A. and Whittington, J. E. (2003), ‘Evidence for the independence of positive and negative well-being: implications for quality of life assessment’, British Journal of Health Psychology, 8: 107–22.
Hurka, T. (1993), Perfectionism, New York: Oxford University Press.
IpsosMORI (2004), What Drives Satisfaction with Local Government? London: IpsosMORI.
Kahneman, D. and Deaton, A. (2010), ‘Does money buy happiness or just a better life’, Proceedings of the National Academy of the Sciences of the Unite States of America, 107: 16489–16493.
Kahneman, D. and Krueger, A. B. (2006), ‘Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20: 324.
Kahneman, D., Krueger, A. B., Schkade, D. A., Schwarz, N. and Stone, A. A. (2004), ‘A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: the Day Reconstruction Method’, Science, 306: 1776–80.
Kahneman, D. and Riis, J. (2005), ‘Living and thinking about it: two perspectives on life’, in Huppert, F., Baylis, N. and Kaverne, B. (eds.), The Science of Wellbeing: Integrating Neurobiology, Psychology, and Social Science, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kahneman, D. and Sugden, R. (2005), ‘Experienced utility as a standard of policy evaluation’, Environmental and Resource Economics, 32: 161–81.
Kahneman, D. and Thaler, R. H. (2006), ‘Anomalies: utility maximization and experienced utility’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20: 221234.
Knabe, A., Ratzel, S., Schob, R. and Weimann, J. (2010), ‘Dissatisfied with life but having a good day: time-use and well-being of the unemployed’, Economic Journal, 120: 867–89.
Krueger, A., Kahneman, D., Schkade, D., Schwarz, N. and Stone, A. (2009), ‘National time accounting: the currency of life’, in A. Krueger: Measuring the Subjective Well-Being of Nations: National Accounts of Time Use and Well-Being, NBER.
Layard, R. (2005), Happiness – Lessons from a New Science, London: Penguin Books.
Layard, R., Mayraz, G. and Nickell, S. (2010), Does relative income matter? Are the critics right?’, in Diener, E, Helliwell, J. and Kahneman, D., International Differences in Well-Being, New York: Oxford University Press.
Lucas, R. E. (2005), ‘Time does not heal all wounds: a longitudinal study of reaction and adaptation to divorce’, Psychological Science, 16: 945–50.
Lucas, R. E., Clark, A. E., Georgellis, Y. and Diener, E. (2003), ‘Reexamining adaptation and the set point model of happiness: reactions to changes in marital status’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84: 527–39.
Luechinger, S. (2009), ‘Valuing air quality using the life satisfaction approach’, Economic Journal, 119: 482515.
Luechinger, S. and Raschky, P. A. (2009), ‘Valuing flood disasters using the life satisfaction approach’, Journal of Public Economics, 93: 620–33.
Luttmer, E. F. P. (2005), ‘Neighbors as negatives: relative earnings and well-being’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120: 9631002.
Lyubomirsky, S., King, L. and Diener, E. (2005), ‘The benefits of frequent positive affect: does happiness lead to success?’, Psychological Bulletin, 131: 803–55.
Metcalfe, R., Powdthavee, N. and Dolan, P. (2011), ‘Destruction and distress: using a quasi-experiment to show the effects of the September 11 attacks on subjective well-being in the UK’, Economic Journal, 121: F81F103.
NICE (2008), Guide to the Methods of Technology Appraisal, London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.
ONS (2000), ‘Psychiatric morbidity among adults living in private households 2000’, main report, Office of National Statistics.
ONS (2007), Social trends, Office of National Statistics.
Parfit, D. (1984), Reasons and Persons, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Peasgood, T. (2008), ‘Measuring well-being for public policy’, Ph.D. thesis, Imperial College, London.
Ryan, R. and Sapp, A. (2007), ‘Basic psychological needs: a self-determination theory perspective on the promotion of wellness across development and cultures’, in Gough, I. and McGregor, A., Wellbeing in Developing Countries: From Theory to Research, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Ryff, C. D. (1989), ‘Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57: 1069–108
Ryff, C. D. and Keyes, C. L. (1995), ‘The structure of psychological well-being revisited’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69: 719–27.
Schwarz, N., Strack, F., Kommer, D. and Wagner, D. (1987), ‘Soccer, rooms and the quality of your life: mood effects on judgments of satisfaction with life in general and with specific life-domains’, European Journal of Social Psychology, 17: 6979.
Sen, A. K. (1985), Commodities and Capabilities, Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Sen, A. (1999), Development as Freedom, New York: Anchor Books.
Shogren, J. F., Shin, S. Y., Hayes, D. J. and Kliebenstein, J. B. (1994), ‘Resolving differences in willingness to pay and willingness to accept’, American Economic Review, 84: 255–70.
Smallwood, J. and Schooler, J. W. (2006), ‘The restless mind’, Psychological Bulletin, 132: 946–58.
Srinivasan, T. N. (1994), ‘Human development: a new paradigm or reinvention of the wheel?’, American Economic Review, 84: 238–43.
Stevenson, B. and Wolfers, J. (2008), ‘Economic growth and happiness: reassessing the easterlin paradox’, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1–87.
Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A. and Fitoussi, J. P. (2009), Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress, OECD.
Stone, A. A. and Shiffman, S. (2002), ‘Capturing momentary, self-report data: a proposal for reporting guidelines’, Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 24: 236–43.
Stone, A. A., Shiffman, S. S. and DeVries, M. W. (1999), ‘Ecological momentary assessment’, in Kahneman, D., Diener, E. and Schwarz, N. (eds.), Well-being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology, New York: Russell-Sage, pp. 2639.
Sumner, L. W. (1996), Welfare, Happiness and Ethics, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Taylor, D. (2011), ‘Being well and doing well (enough): towards a psychosocial study of wellbeing and welfare’, Journal of Social Policy, 40: 777794.
Taylor-Gooby, P. (2008), ‘Choice and values: individualised rational action and social goals’, Journal of Social Policy, 37: 167–85.
UNDP (1990), Human Development Report 1990, New York: Oxford University Press.
van Praag, B. M. S., Frijters, P. and Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. (2003), ‘The anatomy of subjective well-being’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 51: 2949.
van Praag, B. M. S. and Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. (2004), Happiness Quantified: A Satisfaction Calculus Approach, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Waldron, S. (2010), Measuring Subjective Wellbeing in the UK, ONS Report 2010.
Watkins, E. (2008), ‘Constructive and unconstructive repetitive thought’, Psychological Bulletin, 134: 163206.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A. and Tellegen, A. (1988), ‘Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scale’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54: 1063–70.
Watson, N. and Wooden, M. (2004), ‘Sample attrition in the HILDA Survey’, Australian Journal of Labour Economics, 7: 293308.
White, M. and Dolan, P. (2009), ‘Accounting for the richness of daily activities’, Psychological Science, 20: 1000–8.
Wilson, T. D., Lisle, D. J., Schooler, G. D., Hodges, S. D., Klaaren, K. J. and LaFleur, S. J. (1993), ‘Introspecting about reasons can reduce post-choice satisfaction’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19: 331–9.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Social Policy
  • ISSN: 0047-2794
  • EISSN: 1469-7823
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-social-policy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed