Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Motive Attribution and the Moral Politics of the Welfare State

  • ANTHONY KEVINS (a1), ALEXANDER HORN (a2), CARSTEN JENSEN (a3) and KEES VAN KERSBERGEN (a4)
Abstract

This article explores the moral politics of the welfare state and the social conflicts that underlie them. We argue that existing research on the moralism of redistributive and social policy preferences is overly one-dimensional, with a longstanding concentration on attitudes toward welfare state beneficiaries. To widen our understanding of the phenomenon, we introduce the concept of motive attribution: that is, how people answer the question “what drives others to take the positions that they hold?” Doing so allows us to shift the subject of moralistic attitudes, with a move toward uncovering what citizens think of those who hold a given social policy stance. The article then lays out a first systematic overview of motive attributions using an original dataset built from nationally representative surveys conducted in ten Western democracies. Comparing responses across these countries, we draw out important cross-national differences in ascribed motives, including within welfare state regime types.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Ansolabehere, S. and Schaffner, B.F. (2014), ‘Does survey mode still matter? Findings from a 2010 multi-mode comparison’, Political Analysis, 22, 3, 285303.
Arts, W. and Gelissen, J. (2001), ‘Welfare states, solidarity and justice principles: does the type really matter?’, Acta Sociologica, 44, 4, 283299.
Bischof, D. (2017), ‘New figure schemes for stata: plotplain & plottig’, The Stata Journal, 17, 3, 748759.
Blekesaune, M. (2012), ‘Economic strain and public support for redistribution: a comparative analysis of 28 European countries’, Journal of Social Policy, 42, 1, 5772.
Curchin, K. (2015), ‘From the moral limits of markets to the moral limits of welfare’, Journal of Social Policy, 45, 1, 101118.
Ellingsæter, A.L., Kitterød, R.H. and Lyngstadm, J. (2017), ‘Universalising childcare, changing mothers’ attitudes: policy feedback in Norway’, Journal of Social Policy, 46, 1, 149173.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990), The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Ferrera, M. (1996), ‘The ‘southern model’ of welfare in social Europe’, Journal of European Social Policy, 6, 1, 1737.
Green, D.P., Palmquist, B. and Schickler, E. (2002), Partisan hearts and minds: political parties and the social identities of voters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Hainmueller, J. (2012), ‘Entropy balancing for causal effects: a multivariate reweighting method to produce balanced samples in observational studies’, Political Analysis, 20, 2546.
Hainmueller, J. and Xu, Y. (2013), ‘Ebalance: a stata package for entropy balancing’, Journal of Statistical Software, 54, 7, 118.
Isaksson, A.-S. andLindskog, A. (2009), ‘Preferences for redistribution—a country comparison of fairness judgements’, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 72, 3, 884902.
Iyengar, S., Sood, G. and Lelkes, Y. (2012), ‘Affect, not ideology: a social identity perspective on polarization’, Public Opinion Quarterly, 76, 3, 405431.
Iyengar, S. and Westwood, S.J. (2015), ‘Fear and loathing across party lines: new evidence on group polarization’, American Journal of Political Science, 59, 3, 690707.
Jacques, O. and Noël, A. (2018), ‘The case for welfare state universalism, or the lasting relevance of the paradox of redistribution’, Journal of European Social Policy, 28, 1, 7085.
Jæger, M.M. (2009), ‘United but divided: welfare regimes and the level and variance in public support for redistribution’, European Sociological Review, 25, 6, 723737.
Jann, B. (2013), ‘Plotting regression coefficients and other estimates’, The Stata Journal, 14, 4, 708737.
Jensen, C. (2007), ‘Fixed or variable needs? Public support and welfare state reform’, Government & Opposition, 42, 2, 139157.
Jensen, C. (2014), The right and the welfare state. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Jensen, C. and Petersen, M.B. (2017), ‘The deservingness heuristic and the politics of health care’, American Journal of Political Science, 61, 1, 6883.
Jensen, C. and van Kersbergen, K. (2017), The politics of inequality. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Jordan, J. (2013), ‘Policy feedback and support for the welfare state’, Journal of European Social Policy, 23, 2, 134148.
Kearns, A.D.E., Bailey, N., Gannon, M., Livingston, M. and Leyland, A. (2014), “All in it together’? Social cohesion in a divided society: attitudes to income inequality and redistribution in a residential context’, Journal of Social Policy, 43, 3, 453477.
Kevins, A. (2017), Expanding welfare in an age of austerity: increasing protection in an unprotected world. Amsterdam, NL: Amsterdam University Press.
Kevins, A., Horn, A., Jensen, C. and van Kersbergen, K. (2019), ‘The illusion of class in welfare state politics?’, Journal of Social Policy, 48, 1, 2141.
Kevins, A. and van Kersbergen, K. (2019), ‘The effects of welfare state universalism on migrant integration’, Policy & Politics, 47, 1, 115132. doi: 10.1332/030557318X15407315707251.
Korpi, W. and Palme, J. (1998), ‘The paradox of redistribution and strategies of equality: welfare state institutions, inequality, and poverty in the western countries’, American Sociological Review, 63, 5, 661687.
Laenen, T. (2018), ‘Do institutions matter? The interplay between income benefit design, popular perceptions, and the social legitimacy of targeted welfare’, Journal of European Social Policy, 28, 1, 417.
Larsen, C.A. (2008a), ‘The institutional logic of welfare attitudes: how welfare regimes influence public support’, Comparative Political Studies, 41, 2, 145168.
Larsen, C.A. (2008b), ‘The political logic of labour market reforms and popular images of target groups’, Journal of European Social Policy, 18, 1, 5063.
Larsen, C.A. and Dejgaard, T.E. (2013), ‘The institutional logic of images of the poor and welfare recipients: a comparative study of British, Swedish and Danish newspapers’, Journal of European Social Policy, 23, 3, 287299.
Mason, L. (2013), ‘The rise of uncivil agreement issue versus behavioral polarization in the American electorate’, American Behavioral Scientist, 57, 1, 140159.
Mason, L. (2015), ‘“I disrespectfully agree”: the differential effects of partisan sorting on social and issue polarization’, American Journal of Political Science, 59, 1, 128145.
Mason, L. (2016), ‘A cross-cutting calm: how social sorting drives affective polarization’, Public Opinion Quarterly, 80, S1, 351377.
Moon, J.D. (1988), ‘The moral basis of the welfare state’. In: Gutmann, A. (Ed.) Democracy and the welfare state (pp. 2752). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Naldini, M. (2003), The family in the mediterranean welfare state. London, UK: Frank Cass.
Rothstein, B. (1998), Just institutions matter: the moral and political logic of the universal welfare state. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Rothstein, B. and Stolle, D. (2003), ‘Social capital, impartiality and the welfare state: an institutional approach’. In: Hooghe, M. and Stolle, D. (Eds.) Generating social capital: civil society and institutions in comparative perspective (pp. 191209). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Rowlingson, K. and Connor, S. (2011), ‘The ‘deserving’ rich? Inequality, morality and social policy’, Journal of Social Policy, 40, 3, 437452.
Ryan, T.J. (2014), ‘Reconsidering moral issues in politics’, The Journal of Politics, 76, 2, 380397.
Ryan, T.J. (2017), ‘No compromise: political consequences of moralized attitudes’, American Journal of Political Science, 61, 2, 409423.
Sahar, G. (2014), ‘On the importance of attribution theory in political psychology’, Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8, 5, 229249.
Scruggs, L. and Allan, J.P. (2008), ‘Social stratification and welfare regimes for the twenty-first century: revisiting the three worlds of welfare capitalism’, World Politics, 60, 4, 642664.
Skitka, L.J., Bauman, C.W. and Sargis, E.G. (2005), ‘Moral conviction: another contributor to attitude strength or something more?’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 6, 895917.
Skitka, L.J., Washburn, A.N. and Carsel, T.S. (2015), ‘The psychological foundations and consequences of moral conviction’, Current Opinion in Psychology, 6, 4144.
Soroka, S.N. and Wlezien, C. (2010), Degrees of democracy: politics, public opinion, and policy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Van Kersbergen, K. (1995), Social capitalism: a study of christian democracy and the welfare state. New York, NY: Routledge.
Van Kersbergen, K. and Vis, B. (2015), ‘Three worlds’ typology: moving beyond normal science?’, Journal of European Social Policy, 25, 1, 111123.
Van Oorschot, W. (2000), ‘Who should get what, and why?: on deservingness criteria and the conditionality of solidarity among the public’, Policy & Politics, 28, 1, 3348.
Van Oorschot, W. (2006), ‘Making the difference in social Europe: deservingness perceptions among citizens of European welfare states’, Journal of European Social Policy, 16, 1, 2342.
Zucker, G.S. and Weiner, B. (1993), ‘Conservatism and perceptions of poverty: an attributional analysis’, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 12, 925943.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Social Policy
  • ISSN: 0047-2794
  • EISSN: 1469-7823
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-social-policy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed