Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T11:41:59.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Occupational Pension Trap: Towards a Preliminary Empirical Specification*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2009

Abstract

Legislation in 1985 and 1986 has attempted to give new impetus to the growth of occupational and personal pension schemes. This article demonstrates that, because of the interaction between occupational pensions and means-tested social security provision, many of today's pensioners receive little or no financial benefit from their occupational pension. The evidence presented is consistent with the thesis that the pensioners who are worst affected by the ‘pension trap’ include those who, as workers, were low-paid and experienced interrupted employment. As a consequence they reached retirement with small state and occupational pensions, limited savings and no house which they owned. Many are women. The penetration of occupational and personal pensions is currently lowest among the same groups of workers and it could be that the Government's policy to extend the coverage of private pensions will result in an increase in the severity of the pension trap. Some measures for reducing the impact of the pension trap are discussed.

Type
Research Note
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Cmnd 6404 (1942), Social Insurance and Allied Services (Beveridge Report), HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Cmnd 9517 (1985), Reform of Social Security Volume 1, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Cmnd 9519 (1985), Reform of Social Security Volume 3, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Dawson, A. and Evans, G. (1987), ‘Pensioners' incomes and expenditure 1970–85’, Employment Gazette, 05 243–52.Google Scholar
Deacon, A. and Bradshaw, J. (1983), Reserved for the Poor, Basil Blackwell and Martin Robertson, Oxford.Google Scholar
DHSS (1988), Low Income Families Tables 1985, Mimeo, Department of Health and Social Security, London.Google Scholar
Dilnot, A.W., Kay, J.A. and Morris, C.N. (1984), The Reform of Social Security, Institute of Fiscal Studies, London.Google Scholar
Ermisch, J. (1984), Housing Finance: Who Gains?, Policy Studies Institute, London.Google Scholar
Fry, V. and Stark, G. (1987), ‘The take-up of supplementary benefit: gaps in in the “safety net”?’, Fiscal Studies 8: 4, 114.Google Scholar
Hannah, L. (1986), Inventing Retirement: The Development of Occupational Pensions in Britain, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
James, C. (1985), ‘Occupational and private pension schemes’, in Silburn, R. (ed.), The Future of Social Security, Fabian Society, London.Google Scholar
Millar, J. (1985), ‘The incomes and expenditures of supplementary benefit recipients’, Poverty, 60, 41–4.Google Scholar
Munnell, A.H. (1987), ‘The impact of public and private pension schemes on saving and capital formation’, in Congregating Public and Private, International Social Security Association, Studies and Research, 24, 219–36, Geneva.Google Scholar
O'Higgins, M., Bradshaw, J. and Walker, R. (1988), ‘Income distribution over the life cycle’, in Walker, R. and Parker, G. (eds), Money Matters, Sage, London.Google Scholar
Parker, H. (1984), Action on Welfare, Social Affairs Unit, London.Google Scholar
Reddin, M. (1980), ‘Taxation and pensions’, in Sandford, C., Pond, C. and Walker, R. (eds), Taxation and Social Policy, Heinemann, London.Google Scholar
Walker, R. and Hutton, S. (1988), ‘Costs of ageing and retirement’, in Walker, R. and Parker, G. (eds), Money Matters, Sage, London.Google Scholar
Walker, R., Huby, M. and Lawton, D. (1989), ‘Escaping financial dependency in old age’, Ageing and Society, 9: 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, D. (1987), Supplementary Pensions, Social and Community Planning, Research, London.Google Scholar