Skip to main content

Policy Practitioners’ Accounts of Evidence-Based Policy Making: The Case of Universal Credit

  • MARK MONAGHAN (a1) and JO INGOLD (a2)

This paper draws on insider accounts from UK Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) officials to analyse the relationship between evidence and policy making at a time of rapid policy development relating to Universal Credit (UC). The paper argues, firstly, that evidence selection within the DWP was constrained by the overarching austerity paradigm, which constituted a Zeitgeist and had a significant bearing on the evidence selection and translation process, sharpening the focus of policy officials and analysts on the primacy of quantitative evidence when advising Ministers. Secondly, while methodological preferences (or an ‘evidence hierarchy’) impacted on evidence selection, this was not as significant as practitioners’ perceived capabilities to handle and develop evidence for policy. These capabilities were linked to departmental structures and constrained by political feasibility. Together, these dimensions constituted a significant filtration mechanism determining the kinds of evidence that were selected for policy development and those omitted, particularly in relation to UC. The paper contributes to debates about the contemporary role of evidence in policymaking and the potential of the relationship between future evidence production and use.

Hide All
BBC (2016), ‘Universal Credit leaves working families worse off, says IFS
Bochel, H. M. and Duncan, S. (Eds.). (2007), Making policy in theory and practice. Bristol: Policy Press.
Cabinet Office (1999), Modernising government, CM4310, London: The Stationary Office
Cabinet Office (2008), Beyond the horizon: International comparisons in policymaking. London: Centre for Management and Policy Studies.
Cairney, P. and Yamazaki, M. (2017), A Comparison of Tobacco Policy in the UK and Japan: If the Scientific Evidence is Identical, Why is There a Major Difference in Policy?. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 1–16.
Cameron, A., Salisbury, C., Lart, R., Stewart, K., Peckham, S., Calnan, M., Purdy, S. and Thorp, H. (2011), Policy makers' perceptions on the use of evidence from evaluations. Evidence & Policy: a journal of research, debate and practice, 7 (4), 429447.
Caplan, N. (1979), The two-communities theory and knowledge utilization. American behavioral scientist, 22 (3), 459470.
Centre for Social Justice (2009), Dynamic benefits: Towards welfare that works. London: Centre for Social Justice.
Davis, A., Hill, K., Hirsch, D. and Padley, M. (2016), A minimum income standard for the UK in 2016, York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
Department for Work and Pensions (2010), Universal Credit: Welfare that works Cm7957. London: DWP.
Department for Work and Pensions (2017), Understanding how Universal Credit influences employment behaviour: findings from qualitative and experimental research with claimants, available online at
Ford, R. and Lymperopolou, K. (2016), Immigration: How attitudes in the UK compare with Europe, Findings from the British Social Attitudes Survey, available online at
Garthwaite, K. (2016), Hunger pains: Life inside foodbank Britain. Policy Press.
Gingerbread and the Children's Society (2013), Single Parents and Universal Credit: singled out? London: Gingerbread.
Head, B. W. (2008), Three lenses of evidence‐based policy. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 67 (1), 111.
Head, B. (2010), Evidence-based policy: principles and requirements. Strengthening evidence-based policy in the Australian Federation, 1, 1326.
Hendra, R., Ray, K., Vegeris, S., Hevenstone, D. and Hudson, M. (2011), Employment Retention and Advancement (ERA) demonstration: Delivery, take-up, and outcomes of in-work training support for lone parents. Research Report 727. Sheffield: DWP.
Hirsch, D. and Hartfree, Y. (2013), Universal Credit: making work pay, York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation
HM Treasury (2003), The Green Book: appraisal and evaluation in central government, London: HM Treasury
HM Treasury (2011), The Magenta Book: guidance notes for policy evaluation and analysis. London: HM Treasury (Magenta Book Background Papers).
Ingold, J. and Etherington, D. (2013), Work, welfare and gender inequalities: an analysis of activation strategies for partnered women in the UK, Australia and Denmark. Work, employment and society, 27 (4), 621638.
Ingold, J. and Monaghan, M. (2016), Evidence translation: an exploration of policy makers' use of evidence. Policy & Politics, 44 (2), 171190.
Institute for Government (2012), Evidence and evaluation in policymaking a problem of supply or demand? London, Institute for Government.
Legrand, T. (2012), Overseas and over here: policy transfer and evidence-based policy-making. Policy studies, 33 (4), 329348.
Liebling, A., Maruna, S. and McAra, L. (2017), Introduction: The New Vision, in Liebling, A., Maruna, S. and McAra, L eds. The Oxford Handbook of Criminology, 6th Edition, Oxford: Oxford University Press
Maybin, J. (2015), Policy analysis and policy know-how: A case study of officials in England's department of health. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 17 (3), 286304.
Merton, R. K. (1945), Role of the intellectual in public bureaucracy. Social Forces, 405– 415.
Millar, J. and Bennett, F. (2016), ‘Universal Credit: Assumptions, contradictions and virtual reality. Social Policy and Society, 16 (2), 169182.
Monaghan, M. (2010), The complexity of evidence: Reflections on research utilisation in a heavily politicised policy area. Social Policy and Society, 9 (1), 112.
Monaghan, M. (2011), Evidence versus politics: Exploiting research in UK drug policy making? Bristol: Policy Press.
Mulgan, G. (2005), Government, knowledge and the business of policy making: the potential and limits of evidence-based policy. Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 1 (2), 215226.
Nutley, S. M., Walter, I. and Davies, H. T. (2007), Using evidence: How research can inform public services. Policy press.
Nutley, S., Powell, A. and Davies, H. (2013), What counts as good evidence? provocation paper for the alliance for useful evidence. London: Alliance for Useful Evidence.
Parkhurst, J. (2016), The politics of evidence: from evidence-based policy to the good governance of evidence, London: Routledge
Patrick, R. (2014), Working on welfare: Findings from a qualitative longitudinal study into the lived experiences of welfare reform in the UK. Journal of Social Policy, 43 (4), 705725
Patrick, R. (2017), For whose benefit?: The everyday realities of welfare reform. Bristol: Policy Press.
Pawson, R. (2006), Evidence-based policy: a realist perspective. Sage.
Pearson, M. (2010), ‘What do we know? What should we do?’ Melding research validity and rhetoric in the analysis of policy making. Evidence and Policy, 6 (1), 7790.
Purdon, S., Stratford, N., Taylor, R., Natarajan, L., Bell, S. and Wittenburg, D. (2006), Impacts of the Job Impacts of the Job Retention and Retention and Rehabilitation Pilot Rehabilitation Pilot Rehabilitation Pilot. Research Report 342. Leeds: DWP Corporate Document Services.
Rose, R. (1991), What is lesson-drawing? Journal of Public Policy, 11 (1):330
Rosenthal, R. and Di Matteo, M. R. (2001), Meta-analysis: Recent developments in quantitative methods for literature reviews. Annual review of psychology, 52 (1), 5982.
Rotik, M. and Perry, L. (2011), Perceptions of welfare reform and universal credit, Department for Work and Pensions Research Report no 778, available online at
Sanderson, I. (2009), Intelligent policy making for a complex world: pragmatism, evidence and learning. Political Studies, 57 (4), 699719.
Savage, M. (2018), Ministers told to expect backlash as millions lose out from Universal Credit, available online at
Seddon, T. (2005), Drugs, crime and social exclusion: social context and social theory in British drugs–crime research. British Journal of Criminology, 46 (4), 680703.
Smith, K. E. and Joyce, K. E. (2012), Capturing complex realities: understanding efforts to achieve evidence-based policy and practice in public health. Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 8 (1), 5778.
Stevens, A. (2007a), Survival of the ideas that fit: an evolutionary analogy for the use of evidence in policy. Social Policy and Society, 6 (1), 2535.
Stevens, A. (2007b), When two dark figures collide: Evidence and discourse on drug-related crime. Critical Social Policy, 27 (1), 7799.
Stevens, A. (2011), Telling policy stories: an ethnographic study of the use of evidence in policy-making in the UK. Journal of Social Policy, 40 (2), 237255.
Taylor‐Gooby, P. (2012), Root and branch restructuring to achieve major cuts: The social policy programme of the 2010 UK coalition government. Social Policy & Administration, 46 (1), 6182.
Taylor‐Gooby, P. (2016), The Divisive Welfare State. Social Policy & Administration, 50 (6), 712733.
Vaughan, R. J. and Buss, T. F. (1998), Communicating social science research to policymakers (Vol. 48). Sage Publications, Inc.
Weiss, C. H. (1979), The many meanings of research utilization. Public administration review, 39 (5), 426431.
Wintour, P. (2013), Auditors challenge government over cost of universal credit IT problems, London: The Guardian, available online at (accessed 20 April 2018).
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Social Policy
  • ISSN: 0047-2794
  • EISSN: 1469-7823
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-social-policy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed