Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Problems in the Definition and Measurement of Poverty*


Three approaches to defining poverty levels are discussed—social consensus approaches, budget standard methods, and behavioural approaches. Each addresses different questions and none, of itself, has provided—nor, it is argued, could ever provide—an objective definition of poverty. The paper then raises problems that have been largely neglected in defining poverty. First, the treatment of time and home production: the time and ability of individuals to prepare food or to wash and feed without assistance, for example, vary greatly depending on circumstances and in turn affect income needs. Choices and constraints affecting the household formations in which people live and their budgeting behaviour are also important in assessing poverty. Individual variations in behaviour need to be explicitly recognised if practical definitions of poverty levels are to be found. Finally, the paper condemns discussions of poverty that are part of the problem rather than part of the solution.

Hide All
Ashton P. (1984), ‘Poverty and Its Beholders’, New Society, 18 10.
Atkinson A.B. (1985), How Should We Measure Poverty? Some Conceptual Issues, ESRC Programme on Taxation, Incentives and the Distribution of Income, Discussion Paper No. 82.
Bradshaw J., Mitchell Deborah and Morgan Jane (1987), ‘Evaluating Adequacy: The Potential of Budget Standards’, Journal of Social Policy, 16:2, 165181.
Central Statistical Office, 07 1986, ‘The effects of taxes and benefits on household income, 1984’, Economic Trends, London.
Cmnd 9517 (1985), The Reform of Social Security, HMSO, London.
Desai M. (1986), ‘Drawing the line: on defining the poverty threshold’, in Golding P. (ed.). Excluding the Poor, Child Poverty Action Group, London.
London Weekend Television (1983), Breadline Britain, London.
Lynes T. (1979), ‘Costs of Children’, New Society, 15 11.
Mack J. and Lansley S. (1985), Poor Britain, Allen and Unwin, London.
Piachaud D. (1979), The Cost of a Child, Child Poverty Action Group, London.
Piachaud D. (1981), ‘Peter Townsend and the Holy Grail’, New Society. 10 09.
Sen A.K. (1983), ‘Poor, relatively speaking’, Oxford Economic Papers, 35, 153169.
Townsend P. (1979), Poverty in the United Kingdom, Penguin Books, Harmondsworth.
van Praag B.M.S., Hagenaars A.J.M. and van Weeren H. (1982), ‘Poverty in Europe’, Review of Income and Wealth, 28, 345359.
Veit-Wilson J. (1987), ‘Consensual Approaches to Poverty Lines and Social Security’, Journal of Social Policy, 16:2, 183211.
Whitehead A.N. (1933), Adventures of Ideas, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Social Policy
  • ISSN: 0047-2794
  • EISSN: 1469-7823
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-social-policy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 271 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 1218 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 20th October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.