Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Remembering and Rethinking the Social Divisions of Welfare: 50 Years On

  • KIRK MANN (a1)

This article revisits Titmuss's essay on the Social Divisions of Welfare (SDW) and reflects on its continuing relevance. Titmuss first presented the SDW in an Eleanor Rathbone Memorial lecture at Birmingham University in 1955, but it is best known from his Essays on the Welfare State published in 1958. Titmuss challenged the stereotype of ‘welfare’ as simply public welfare dependency and illustrated the different elements of the SDW. Some limitations of Titmuss's approach are identified, notably in relation to how he saw dependency arising, and revisions offered. The article provides a number of examples from the UK but also highlights some significant parallels with the SDW in the USA and Australia, the so-called ‘liberal welfare regimes’ (Esping-Andersen, 1990). Finally, it is claimed that 50 years on we need to be reminded of the insights and analytical potential of Titmuss's essay.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

M. Adler (2004), ‘Combining welfare-to work measures with tax credits: a new hybrid approach to social security in the UK’, International Social Security Review, 57: 2, 87106.

R. Breen and L. P. Cooke (2005), ‘The persistence of the gendered division of domestic labour’, European Sociological Review, 21: 1, 4357.

F. G. Castles (1997), ‘Leaving the Australian labour force: an extended encounter with the state’, Governance, 10: 2, 97121.

G. L. Clark (2006), ‘The UK occupational pension system in crisis’, in H. Pemberton , P. Thane and N. Whiteside (eds.), Britain's Pension Crisis: History and Policy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

L. Craig (2006), ‘Does father care mean fathers share? A comparison of how mothers and fathers in intact families spend time with children’, Gender and Society, 20: 2, 259–81.

J. Ginn and S. Arber (1993), ‘Pension penalties: the gendered division of occupational welfare’, Work Employment and Society, 7: 1, 4770.

J. S. Hacker and P. Pierson (2002), ‘Business power and social policy: employers and the formation of the American welfare state’, Politics and Society, 30: 2, 277325.

P. Henman and M. Adler (2003), ‘Information technology and the governance of social security’, Critical Social Policy, 23: 2, 139–64.

I. Lødemel and H. Trickey (2001), An Offer You Can't Refuse: Workfare in International Perspective, Bristol: Policy Press.

D. Reay and H. Lucey (2003), ‘The limits of “choice”: children and inner city schooling’, Sociology, 37: 1, 121–42.

D. Reisman (2003) ‘Richard Titmuss: welfare as good conduct’, European Journal of Political Economy, 20: 771–94.

K Rummery and C Glendinning . (1999), ‘Negotiating needs, access and gatekeeping: developments in health and community care policies in the UK and the rights of disabled and older citizens’, Critical Social Policy, 19: 3, 335–51.

L. C. Sayer , S. M. Bianchi and J. P. Robinson (2004), ‘Are parents investing less in children? Trends in mothers' and fathers' time with children’, American Journal of Sociology, 110: 143.

N. Silver (2006), ‘The trouble with final salary pensions’, Economic Affairs, 26: 4, 5360.

P. Spicker (1995), Social Policy, Harlow: Prentice Hall.

T. W. Vaughan (2006), ‘Roth 401(k) on the horizon: worth the effort’, Compensation and Benefits Review, 38: 2, 52–6.

C. E. Weller and J. B. Wenger (2005), ‘Ruining retirement: how the union benefit crisis is shifting risks onto workers’, New Labor Forum, 14: 3, 81–8.

F. Williams (2000), ‘Principles for recognition and respect’, in G. Lewis , S. Gewirtz and J. Clarke (eds.), Rethinking Social Policy, London: Sage with The Open University.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Social Policy
  • ISSN: 0047-2794
  • EISSN: 1469-7823
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-social-policy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 20
Total number of PDF views: 105 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 374 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 28th June 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.