Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-15T13:25:01.999Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The role of social enterprises in facilitating labour market integration for people with disabilities: A convenient deflection from policy mainstreaming?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2021

CHERYL HIU-KWAN CHUI Open the ORCID record for CHERYL HIU-KWAN CHUI [Opens in a new window] ,
CHEE HON CHAN Open the ORCID record for CHEE HON CHAN [Opens in a new window]  and
YANTO CHANDRA Open the ORCID record for YANTO CHANDRA [Opens in a new window]
CHERYL HIU-KWAN CHUI
Affiliation:
Department of Social Work and Social Administration, University of Hong Kong, 5/F, Jockey Club Tower, Centennial Campus, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong e-mail: chkchui@hku.hk
CHEE HON CHAN
Affiliation:
Centre for Suicide Research and Prevention, University of Hong Kong, 2/F, The Hong Kong Jockey Club Building for Interdisciplinary Research, 5 Sassoon Road, Pokfulam, Hong Kong e-mail: gchc@hku.hk
YANTO CHANDRA
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University e-mail: yanto.chandra@polyu.edu.hk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Policymakers have increasingly embraced social enterprises as a vehicle to create job opportunities for the disadvantaged. However, there is limited research on social enterprises in the context of disability in relation to labour market integration. Drawing on the perspectives of representatives of work integration social enterprises and people with disabilities employed in these enterprises (n=21), this study examines whether and how work integration social enterprises promote inclusion for people with disabilities, and also explores the role of WISEs in enabling people with disabilities to transition into open employment. Thematic analysis revealed three key emergent themes: Cocooned inclusion but not transition; Reinforced normative demarcation; and WISEs as a deflection from institutionalizing proactive disability policy measures. This article argues that, although WISEs were able to provide job opportunities for people with disabilities, their purported function in enabling disabled people to transition into open employment remains constrained by factors beyond their control including prevailing norms and the absence of proactive disability employment measures. This article cautions against the over-romanticisation of WISEs as the primary means to ensure the rights of people with disabilities to participate in the labour market. Implications on disability employment policies in relation to social enterprises are discussed.

Type
Article
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 52 , Issue 1 , January 2023 , pp. 176 - 196
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, M., Barraket, J., Castellas, E., Hiroy, K., Suchowerska, R. and Ward-Christie, L. (2019), Evaluating the productivity of social enterprises in comparison to SMEs in Australia. Social Enterprise Journal, 15(2), 179–194. doi: 10.1108/SEJ-09-2018-0064 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avelino, F., Wittmayer, J. M., Pel, B., Weaver, P., Dumitru, A., Haxeltine, A., Kemp, R., Jørgensen, M. S., Bauler, T., Ruijsink, S. and O’Riordan, T. (2019), Transformative social innovation and (dis)empowerment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 145, 195–206. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayob, N., Teasdale, S. and Fagan, K. (2016), How social innovation ‘came to be’: tracing the evolution of a contested concept. Journal of Social Policy, 45(4), 635–653. doi: 10.1017/S004727941600009X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, C. and Mercer, G. (2005), Disability, work, and welfare: challenging the social exclusion of disabled people. Work, Employment and Society, 19(3), 527–545. doi: 10.1177/0950017005055669 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2012), Thematic analysis. In APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol 2: Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (pp. 57–71), Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burchardt, T., Le Grand, J. and Piachaud, D. (2002), Degrees of exclusion: Developing a dynamic, multidimensional measure. In Hills, J., Le Grand, J., and Piachaud, D. (Eds.), Understanding social exclusion (pp. 30–43), Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Census and Statistics Department. (2015), Persons with disabilities and chronic diseases in Hong Kong. Retrieved from https://www.statistics.gov.hk/pub/B71501FB2015XXXXB0100.pdf Google Scholar
Chan, C. H., Chui, C. H.-K. and Chandra, Y. (2021), The role of social innovation policy in social service sector reform: Evidence from Hong Kong. Journal of Social Policy. doi: 10.1017/S0047279421000167 Google Scholar
Chan, C. H., Chui, C. H. K., Chan, K. S. T. and Yip, P. S. F. (2019), The role of the social innovation and entrepreneurship development fund in fostering social entrepreneurship in Hong Kong: A study on public policy innovation. Social Policy & Administration, 53(6), 903–919. doi: 10.1111/spol.12524 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, H. and Wong, M. (2005), Baseline survey on employers’ attitudes towards employment of people with disabilities. Retrieved from https://www.eoc.org.hk/EOC/Upload/UserFiles/File/Funding%20Programme/policy/1314/20150518/report_E.pdf Google Scholar
Chan, K. T., Kuan, Y. Y. and Wang, S. T. (2011), Similarities and divergences: comparison of social enterprises in Hong Kong and Taiwan. Social Enterprise Journal, 7(1), 33–49. doi: 10.1108/17508611111130149 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandra, Y., Teasdale, S. and Tjiptono, F. (2020), Social entrepreneurship research in the Greater China Region: A scoping review and new research framework. Journal of Asian Public Policy. Google Scholar
Chau, R. C. M., Yu, S. W. K. and Boxall, K. (2018), Combating social exclusion faced by disabled people in the wage labour market in Hong Kong. Social Policy and Society, 17(4), 547–561. doi: 10.1017/S147474641700032X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, A. S. K., Chiu, F. P. F., Fung, M. S. M. and Au, R. W. C. (2015), A review of supported employment services for people with mental disabilities in Hong Kong. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 42(1), 75–83. doi: 10.3233/JVR-140718 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chui, C. H. and Chan, C. H. (2019), The role of work integration social enterprises in welfare provision: Critical perspectives from nonprofits. 7th EMES International Research Conference on Social Enterprise, Sheffield, UK.Google Scholar
Chui, C. H., Arat, G., Chan, K. and Wong, P. W. C. (2020), Growing old as a member of an ethnic minority in Hong Kong: implications for an inclusive long-term care policy framework. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 39(5), 463–471. doi: 10.1177/0733464819873504 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chui, C. H.-K., Shum, M. H. Y. and Lum, T. Y. S. (2019), Work integration social enterprises as vessels of empowerment? Perspectives from employees. Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development, 29(2), 133–148. doi: 10.1080/02185385.2018.1538899 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chui, C. H., Tang, J. Y. M., Kwan, C. M., Fung Chan, O., Tse, M., Chiu, R. L. H., … Lum, T. Y. S. (2018), Older adults’ perceptions of age-friendliness in Hong Kong. The Gerontologist, 59(3), 549–558. doi: 10.1093/geront/gny052 Google Scholar
Cockain, A. (2018), Shallow inclusion (or integration) and deep exclusion: en-dis-abling identities through government webpages in Hong Kong. Social inclusion, 6(2), 1–11. Doi: 10.17645/si.v6i2.1282 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Commission On Poverty. (2005), From welfare to self-reliance-social enterprise development. Retrieved from https://www.povertyrelief.gov.hk/archive/2007/textweb/eng/pdf/CoP%20Paper%2022.2005(e).pdf Google Scholar
Dai, H., Lau, Y. and Lee, K. H. (2019), Social Innovation, Value Penetration, and the Power of the Nonprofit Sector: Workers’ Co-Operative Societies in Hong Kong. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 48(6), 1210–1228. doi: 10.1177/0899764019863107 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, G., McGahan, A. M. and Prabhu, J. (2012), Innovation for Inclusive Growth: Towards a Theoretical Framework and a Research Agenda. Journal of Management Studies, 49(4), 661–683. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01048.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerrard, J. (2015), Welfare rights, self-help and social enterprise: Unpicking neoliberalism’s mess. Journal of Sociology, 53(1), 47–62. doi: 10.1177/1440783315607388 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gidron, B. (2014), Market-oriented social enterprises employing people with disabilities: A participants’ perspective. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 5(1), 60–76. doi: 10.1080/19420676.2013.829116 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, E. and Wilton, R. (2011), Alternative spaces of ‘work’ and inclusion for disabled people. Disability & Society, 26(7), 867–880. doi: 10.1080/09687599.2011.618742 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, J. P., Kurth, N. K. and Hunt, S. L. (2013), Employment as a health determinant for working-age, dually-eligible people with disabilities. Disabil Health J, 6(2), 100–106. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2012.11.001 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ho, A. P.-Y. and Chan, K.-T. (2010), The social impact of work-integration social enterprise in Hong Kong. International Social Work, 53(1), 33–45. doi: 10.1177/0020872809348950 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holliday, I. (2000), Productivist welfare capitalism: Social policy in East Asia. Political studies, 48(4), 706–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humber, L. A. (2014), Social inclusion through employment: the marketisation of employment support for people with learning disabilities in the United Kingdom. Disability & Society, 29(2), 275–289. doi: 10.1080/09687599.2013.776490 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Labour Organization (ILO), 2020. Work and disability. Retrieved July 3, 2020, from https://www.ilo.org/global/topics/disability-and-work/WCMS_475650/lang--en/index.htm Google Scholar
Kim, Y. (2009), Can social enterprise stand for persons with disabilities? The case of South Korean social enterprises, 2007–2008. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 2(3), 293–308. doi: 10.1080/17516230903204760 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kummitha, R. K. R. (2016), Social entrepreneurship as a tool to remedy social exclusion: A win–win scenario? South Asia Research, 36(1), 61–79. doi: 10.1177/0262728015615485 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, E. K. M. and Chandra, Y. (2020), Dynamic and marketing capabilities as predictors of social enterprises’ performance. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 31(3), 587–600. doi: 10.1007/s11266-019-00155-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leung, Z. C., Ho, A. P., Tjia, L. Y., Tam, R. K., Chan, K. T. and Lai, M. K. (2019), Social impacts of work integration social enterprise in Hong Kong–workfare and beyond. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 10(2), 159–176. doi: 10.1080/19420676.2018.1541007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legislative Council of the Hong Kong SAR. (2016), Social enterprises in Hong Kong and the United Kingdom. Retrieved from https://www.legco.gov.hk/research-publications/english/essentials-1617ise05-social-enterprises-in-hong-kong-and-the-united-kingdom.htm#endnote7 Google Scholar
Lillestø, B. and Sandvin, J. T. (2014), Limits to vocational inclusion?: Disability and the social democratic conception of labour. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 16(1), 45–58. doi: 10.1080/15017419.2012.735203 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lune, H. and Berg, B. L. (2017), Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (9th ed), England: Pearson.Google Scholar
Mair, J. and Martí, I. (2006), Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of world business : JWB, 41(1), 36–44. doi: 10.1016/j.jwb.2005.09.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKinnon, K., Kennedy, M., Barraket, J. and DeCotta, T. (2020), Is being in work good for wellbeing? Work Integration Social Enterprises in regional Australia. Australian Geographer, 51(3), 361–375. doi: 10.1080/00049182.2020.1781322 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meltzer, A., Kayess, R. and Bates, S. (2018), Perspectives of people with intellectual disability about open, sheltered and social enterprise employment: Implications for expanding employment choice through social enterprises. Social Enterprises Journal, 14(2), 225–244. doi: 10.1108/SEJ-06-2017-0034 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meltzer, A., Robinson, S. and Fisher, K. R. (2020), Barriers to finding and maintaining open employment for people with intellectual disability in Australia. Social Policy & Administration, 54(1), 88–101. doi: 10.1111/spol.12523 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Modini, M., Joyce, S., Mykletun, A., Christensen, H., Bryant, R. A., Mitchell, P. B. and Harvey, S. B. (2016), The mental health benefits of employment: Results of a systematic meta-review. Australas Psychiatry, 24(4), 331–336. doi: 10.1177/1039856215618523 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Monroe-White, T. and Zook, S. (2018), Social enterprise innovation: A quantitative analysis of global patterns. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 29(3), 496–510. doi: 10.1007/s11266-018-9987-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moser, I. (2000), Against Normalisation: Subverting norms of ability and disability. Science as Culture, 9(2), 201–240. doi: 10.1080/713695234 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, D. C. (1990), Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oosterlynck, S., Novy, A. and Kazepov, Y. (2019), Local social innovation to combat poverty and exclusion: A critical appraisal. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Poon-McBrayer, K. (2013), Rhetoric, accountability, advocacy: Postschool transition of students with specific learning difficulties in Hong Kong. The Australasian Journal of Special Education, 37(1), 4–18. doi: 10.1017/jse.2013.4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qian, J., Riseley, E. and Barraket, J. (2019), Do employment-focused social enterprises provide a pathway out of disavantage? An evidence review. Australia: The Centre for Social Impact Swinburne.Google Scholar
Rothschild, J. (2009), Workers’ cooperatives and social enterprise: A forgotten route to social equity and democracy. American Behavioral Scientist, 52(7), 1023–1041. doi: 10.1177/0002764208327673 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SEBC. (2020), Social Enterprise. Social Enterprise Business Centre. Retrieved from https://socialenterprise.org.hk/en/content/se-faq Google Scholar
Sinclair, S., Mazzei, M., Baglioni, S. and Roy, M. J. (2018), Social innovation, social enterprise, and local public services: Undertaking transformation? Social Policy & Administration, 52(7), 1317–1331. doi: 10.1111/spol.12389 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, P., McVilly, K. R., McGillivray, J. and Chan, J. (2018), Developing open employment outcomes for people with an intellectual disability using a Social Enterprise Framework. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 48, 59–77. doi: 10.3233/JVR-170916 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Social Enterprise Business Centre (SEBC) (2020), Employment for physically disabled. Retrieved July 20, 2020, from https://socialenterprise.org.hk/en/sedb/tags/-Re7mUDAQPKotE9-Ddgqww?page=6 Google Scholar
Social Enterprise Business Centre (SEBC) (2021), Disability Inclusion. Retrieved from https://socialenterprise.org.hk/en/sedb/tags/KWzX3RJDTaGjzJVpUv7lpA Google Scholar
Social Welfare Department. (2020a), Enhancing Employment of People with Disabilities through Small Enterprise Project. Retreived from https://www.swd.gov.hk/en/index/site_pubsvc/page_rehab/sub_listofserv/id_employment/id_enhancinge/ Google Scholar
Social Welfare Department. (2020b), Supported employment service. Retrieved from https://www.swd.gov.hk/storage/asset/section/382/en/SE_List_of_Capacity_by_District_E_072020.pdf Google Scholar
Spear, R. and Bidet, E. (2005), Social enterprise for work integration in 12 European countries: a descriptive analysis. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 76(2), 195–231. doi: 10.1111/j.1370-4788.2005.00276.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tang, K. L., Fung, H. L., Au, K. Y., Lee, J. K. C. and Ko, L. S. (2008), Social enterprises in Hong Kong: Toward a conceptual model. Retrieved from Hong Kong: https://www.pico.gov.hk/doc/tc/research_reports/20080421%20Social%20Enterprises%20in%20Hong%20Kong.pdf Google Scholar
Teasdale, S. (2010), How can social enterprise address disadvantage? Evidence from an inner city community. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 22(2), 89–107. doi: 10.1080/10495141003601278 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsakalou, D., Hamilton, L. and Brown, J. (2020), Institutional narratives and the struggle for inclusive communities in the Greek context. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 24(4), 395–413. doi: 10.1080/13603116.2018.1464605 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Nations. (2012), Concluding observations on the initial report of China, adopted by the Committee at its eighth session (17-28 September 2012), LC Paper No. CB(2)119/12-13(01), Retrieved July 12, 2020, from https://www.legco.gov.hk/yr12-13/english/panels/ca/papers/cacb2-119-1-e.pdf Google Scholar
Welter, F., Baker, T. and Wirsching, K. (2019), Three waves and counting: the rising tide of contextualization in entrepreneurship research. Small Business Economics, 52(2), 319–330. doi: 10.1007/s11187-018-0094-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilton, R. and Evans, J. (2018), Accounting for context: Social enterprises and meaningful employment for people with mental illness. Work, 61(4), 561–574. doi: 10.3233/WOR-182826 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Bank. (2015), Social inclusion. Retrieved from ˜https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/social-inclusion#:˜:text=Social%20inclusion%20is%20the%20process,the%20basis%20of%20their%20identity.Google Scholar
Yang, N. and Kühner, S. (2020), Beyond the limits of the productivist regime: capturing three decades of East Asian welfare development with fuzzy sets. Social Policy and Society. doi: 10.1017/S147474641900054X CrossRefGoogle Scholar