Skip to main content Accesibility Help
×
×
Home

Shifting the Goalposts: A Longitudinal Mixed-Methods Study of the Health of Long-Term Incapacity Benefit Recipients during a Period of Substantial Change to the UK Social Security System

  • KAYLEIGH GARTHWAITE (a1), CLARE BAMBRA (a2), JONATHAN WARREN (a3), ADETAYO KASIM (a4) and GRAEME GREIG (a5)...
Abstract

The UK social security safety net for those who are out of work due to ill health or disability has experienced significant change, most notably the abolition of Incapacity Benefit (IB) and the introduction of Employment and Support Allowance (ESA). These changes have been underpinned by the assumption that many recipients are not sufficiently sick or disabled to ‘deserve’ welfare benefits – claims that have been made in the absence of empirical data on the health of recipients. Employing a unique longitudinal and mixed-methods approach, this paper explores the health of a cohort of 229 long-term IB recipients in the North East of England over an eighteen-month period, during a time of significant changes to the UK welfare state. In-depth interviews with twenty-five of the survey cohort are also presented to illustrate the lived experiences of recipients. Contributing to debates surrounding the conceptualisation of work-readiness for sick and disabled people, findings indicate IB recipients had significantly worse health than the general population, with little change in their health state over the eighteen-month study period. Qualitative data reinforced the constancy of ill health for IB recipients. Finally, the paper discusses the implications for social policy, noting how the changing nature of administrative definitions and redefinitions of illness and capacity to work can impact upon the lives of sick and disabled people.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Bambra, C. (2008), ‘In sickness or in health? Incapacity Benefit reform and the politics of ill health’, British Medical Journal, 337: 1452.
Bambra, C. (2011), Work, Worklessness and the Political Economy of Health, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bambra, C. and Smith, K. E. (2010), ‘No longer deserving? Sickness benefit reform and the politics of (ill) health’, Critical Public Health, 20: 1, 7183.
Beatty, C., Fothergill, S. and Macmillan, R. (2000), ‘A theory of employment, unemployment and sickness’, Regional Studies, 34: 7, 617–30.
Bendelow, G. (1993), ‘Using visual imagery to explore gendered notions of pain’, in Renzetti, C. M. and Lee, R. M. (eds.), Researching Sensitive Topics, Newbury Park, CA: SAGE, pp. 212–28.
Burns, T., Catty, J., Becker, T., Drake, R. E., Fioritti, A., Knapp, M., Lauber, C., Rössler, W., Tomov, T., van Busschbach, J., White, S. and Wiersma, D. (2007), ‘The effectiveness of supported employment for people with severe mental illness: a randomised controlled trial’, Lancet, 370: 1146–52.
Charmaz, K. (1991), Good Days, Bad Days: The Self in Chronic Illness and Time, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Crawford, J. R., Henry, J. D., Crombie, C. and Taylor, E. P. (2001), ‘Normative data for the HADS from a large non-clinical sample’, British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 40: 429–34.
Deacon, A. (1978), ‘The scrounging controversy: public attitudes towards the unemployed in contemporary Britain’, Social and Economic Administration, 12: 2, 120–35.
Dean, H. (forthcoming), ‘“Life first” welfare, the need/right to work and the scope for a “eudaimonic ethic” of social security’, in Keune, M. and Serrano Pascual, A. (eds.), Deconstructing Flexicurity and Constructing Alternative Perspectives, London: Routledge.
Dean, H. (2003), ‘Re-conceptualising welfare-to-work for people with multiple problems and needs’, Journal of Social Policy, 32: 3, 441–59.
Dean, H. and Taylor-Gooby, P. (1992), Dependency Culture the Explosion of a Myth, Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) (2011), Employment and Support Allowance: Work Capability Assessment by Health Condition and Functional Impairment – Official Statistics, London: TSO.
Finkelstein, V. (1980), Attitudes and Disabled People: Issues for Discussion, New York: World Rehabilitation Monograph.
Gandek, B., Ware, J. E., Aaronson, N. K., Apolone, G., Bjorner, J. B., Brazier, J. E., Bullinger, M., Kaasa, S., Leplege, A., Prieto, L. and Sullivan, M. (1998), ‘Cross-validation of item selection and scoring for the SF-12 health survey in nine countries: results from the IQOLA Project’, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51: 11, 1171–8.
Garthwaite, K. (2011), ‘The language of shirkers and scroungers? Talking about illness, disability and coalition welfare reform’, Disability and Society, 26: 3, 369–72.
Grover, C. and Piggott, L. (2010), ‘From incapacity benefit to employment and support allowance: social sorting, sickness and impairment, and social security’, Policy Studies, 31: 2, 265–82.
Guba, E. G. and Lincoln, Y. S. (1994), ‘Competing paradigms in qualitative research’, in Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S. (eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research, New York: Sage, pp. 105–17.
Haverkamp, B. E., Morrow, S. L. and Ponterotto, J. G. (2005), ‘A time and place for qualitative and mixed methods in counseling psychology research’, Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52: 123–5.
Kellett, S., Bickerstaffe, D., Purdie, F., Dyke, A., Filer, S., Lomax, V. and Tomlinson, H. (2011), ‘The clinical and occupational effectiveness of condition management for Incapacity Benefit recipients’, British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 50: 164–77.
Kemp, P. and Davidson, J. (2010), ‘Employability trajectories among new claimants of incapacity benefit’, Policy Studies, 31: 2, 203–21.
Kind, P., Hardman, G. and Macran, S. (1999), UK Population Norms for EQ-5D, Vol. 172, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
McKendrick, J., Sinclair, S., Irwin, A., O’Donnell, H., Scott, G. and Dobbie, L. (2008), The Media, Poverty and Public Opinion in the UK, York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
NICE (National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence) (2009), Public Health Guidance 19: Managing Long-Term Sickness Absence and Incapacity for Work, London: NICE.
Norman, P. and Bambra, C. (2007), ‘Incapacity or unemployment? The utility of an administrative data source as an updatable indicator of population health’, Population, Space and Place, 13: 333–52.
Norris, M. (1978), ‘Those we like to help’, New Society, 45: 822, 18–25.
Plano-Clark, V., Huddleston-Casas, C., Churchill, S., O’Neil Green, D., and Garrett, A. (2008), Mixed Methods Approaches in Family Science Research , Journal of Family Issues, 29: 11, 15431566.
Sainsbury, R. and Davidson, J. (2006), Routes onto Incapacity Benefits: Findings from Qualitative Research, DWP Research Report 350, London: The Stationery Office.
Shildrick, T., MacDonald, R., Webster, C. and Garthwaite, K. (2012), Poverty and Insecurity: Life in ‘Low-Pay, No-Pay’ Britain, Bristol: Policy Press.
Skivington, K., McCartney, G., Thomson, H. and Bond, L. (2010), ‘Challenges in evaluating welfare to work policy interventions: would an RCT design have been the answer to all our problems?’, BMC Public Health, 10: 254.
Strauss, A. (1969), Mirrors and Masks, Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Stone, D. A. (1986), The Disabled State, Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Taylor-Gooby, P. (1983), ‘Moralism, self-interest and attitudes to welfare’, Policy and Politics, 11: 2, 145–60.
Taylor-Gooby, P. (1985), Public Opinion, Ideology and State Welfare, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Warren, J. (2005), ‘Disabled people the state and employment’, in Roulstone, A. and Barnes, C. (eds.), Working Futures: Disabled People, Employment Policy and Social Inclusion, Bristol: Policy Press.
Warren, J., Bambra, C., Kasim, A., Garthwaite, K., Mason, J. and Booth, M. (2013), ‘Prospective pilot evaluation of the effectiveness and cost-utility of a “health first” case management service for long-term Incapacity Benefit recipients’, Journal of Public Health, 19.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Social Policy
  • ISSN: 0047-2794
  • EISSN: 1469-7823
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-social-policy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed