Altreiter, C. and Leibetseder, B. (2015), ‘Constructing inequality: deserving and undeserving clients in Austrian social assistance offices’, Journal of Social Policy, 44, 1, 127–145
Bennett, H. (2017), ‘Re-examining British welfare-to-work contracting using a transaction cost perspective’, Journal of Social Policy, 46, 1, 129–148
Blaxland, M. (2013), ‘Street-level interpellation: how government addresses mothers claiming income support’, Journal of Social Policy, 42, 4, 783–797
Brady, M. A. (2011a), Governing single mothers through personalized planning programs. PhD Thesis, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta.
Brady, M. (2011b). Researching governmentalities through ethnography: the case of Australian welfare reforms and programs for single parents. Critical Policy Studies, 5 (3), 264–282.
Brodkin, E.Z. (1997), ‘Inside the welfare contract: discretion and accountability in state welfare administration’, Social Service Review 71, 1, 1–33
Brodkin, E.Z. (2013), ‘Street-level organisations and the welfare state’, in Brodkin, E.Z. and Marston, G. (eds.), Work and the Welfare State: Street-level Organisations and Workfare Politics, Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 17–34
Carter, E. and Whitworth, A. (2015), ‘Creaming and parking in quasi-marketised welfare-to-work schemes: designed out of or designed into the UK Work Programme?’, Journal of Social Policy, 44, 2, 277–296
Cowling, S. and Mitchell, W.F. (2003), ‘False promise or false premise? Evaluating the job network’, Australian Journal of Labour Economics, 6, 2, 207–226
Considine, M., Lewis, J.M. and O'Sullivan, S. (2011), ‘Quasi-markets and service delivery flexibility following a decade of employment assistance reform in Australia’, Journal of Social Policy, 40, 4, 811–833
Department of Social Security. (1998), New ambitions for our country: A new contract for welfare. UK: London: House of Commons, Cm 3805
Dubois, V. (2010), The Bureaucrat and the Poor: Encounters in French Welfare Offices, Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.
Finn, D. (2011), Job Services Australia: Design and Implementation Lessons for the British Context, Research Report No. 752, Sheffield: Department for Work and Pensions
Forsey, M., (2010), Ethnography as participant listening. Ethnography, 11 (4), pp. 558–572.
Grahame, T. and Marston, G. (2012), ‘Welfare-to-work policies and the experience of employed single mothers on income support in Australia: Where are the benefits?’, Australian Social Work, 65,1, 73–86
Hacking, I. (1986), ‘Making up people’, in (Ed) Biagiolo, Mario The Science Studies Reader, New York, New York: Routledge, pp. 161–171
Haux, T. (2012), ‘Activating lone parents: An evidence-based policy appraisal of welfare-to-work reform in Britain’, Social Policy and Society, 11, 1, 1–14
Henman, P. (2004), ‘Targeted! Population segmentation, electronic surveillance and governing the unemployed in Australia’, International Sociology, 19, 2, 173–191
Henman, P. and Dean, M. (2010), ‘E-government and the production of standardized individuality’, in Higgins, V. and Larner, W. (eds.), Calculating the Social Standards and the Reconfiguration of Governing, Basingstoke, Hampshire; New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 77–93
Ingram, H. and Schneider, A.L. (2015), ‘Making distinctions: the social construction of target populations’, in Fischer, F., Torgerson, D., Durnová, A. and Orsini, M. (eds.), Handbook of Critical Policy Studies, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 259–273
Jordon, J.D. (2017), Evidence from the ‘Frontline’? An Ethnographic Problematisation of Welfare-to-Work Administrator Opinions. Work, Employment and Society, p. 0950017017741238.
Korteweg, A.C. (2003), ‘Welfare reform and the subject of the working mother: “Get a job, a better job, then a career”’, Theory and Society, 32, 4, 445–480
Korteweg, A.C. (2006), ‘The construction of gendered citizenship at the welfare office: an ethnographic comparison of welfare-to-work workshops in the United States and the Netherlands’, Social Politics, 13, 3, 313–340
Lewis, J.E. (1997), ‘Lone mothers: The British case’, in Lewis, J. (ed.), Lone Mothers in European Welfare Regimes: Shifting Policy Logics, London and Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 50–75
Lippert, R. and Brady, M. (2016), ‘Governmentalities, the ethnographic imaginary and beyond’, in Brady, M. and Lippert, R. K. (eds.), Governing Practices: Neoliberalism, Governmentality, and the Ethnographic Imaginary, University of Toronto Press.
McArthur, M., Thomson, L. and Winkworth, G. (2013), ‘Jumping through hoops: the cost of compliance on sole parents’, Child & Family Social Work, 18, 2, 159–167
McDonald, C. and Marston, G. (2008), ‘Re-visiting the quasi-market in employment services: Australia's job network’, Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 30, 2, 101–117
Raffass, T. (2017), ‘Demanding activation’, Journal of Social Policy, 46, 2, 349–365
Schneider, A. and Ingram, H. (1993), ‘Social construction of target populations: implications for politics and policy’, American Political Science Review, 87, 2, 334–347
Struyven, L. and Steurs, G. (2005), ‘Design and redesign of a quasi-market for the reintegration of jobseekers: empirical evidence from Australia and the Netherlands’, Journal of European Social Policy, 15, 3, 211–229
Thomas, M. (2007), A review of developments in the Job Network, Parliamentary Library, Department of Parliamentary Services, Canberra
Whitworth, A. (2016), ‘Neoliberal paternalism and paradoxical subjects: confusion and contradiction in UK activation policy’, Critical Social Policy, 36, 3, 412–431