Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T21:28:19.565Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tipping the Balance: The Problematic Nature of Work–Life Balance in a Low-Income Neighbourhood

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 August 2007

HARTLEY DEAN
HARTLEY DEAN*
Affiliation:
Reader in Social Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE email: h.dean@lse.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The article attempts to locate the contested notion of work–life balance within the context of global trends and recent policy developments. It describes a small-scale qualitative study of work–life balance as it is experienced within a low-income neighbourhood in the UK. The study findings are used to inform reflections on the powerlessness experienced by many working parents seeking to accommodate family life with paid employment; and on the nature of the calculative responsibilities that are imposed upon working parents by recent shifts in social and labour market policy. It is contended that policy makers should tip the balance of the work–life equation from the current preoccupation with business interests in favour of wider social responsibility concerns.

Type
Article
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 36 , Issue 4 , October 2007 , pp. 519 - 537
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bloom, N., Kretschmer, T. and van Reenen, J. 2006, Work–Life Balance, Management Practices and Productivity, London: Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bond, S., Hyman, J., Summers, J. and Wise, S. 2002, Family Friendly Working? Putting Policy into Practice? Bristol: The Policy Press/Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
Bonoli, J. and Powell, M. 2002, ‘Third ways in Europe’, Social Policy and Society, 1: 1, 59–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burchell, G. 1996, ‘Liberal government and techniques of the self’, in Barry, A., Osborne, T. and Rose, N. (eds), Foucault and Political Reason: Liberalism, Neo-Liberalism and Rationalities of Government, London: UCL Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, K. 2006, ‘Childhood, parenting and early intervention: a critical examination of the Sure Start national programme’, Critical Social Policy, 26: 4, 699–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daycare Trust 2005, Daycare Trust Annual Review, London: Daycare Trust.Google Scholar
de Schweinitz, K. 1961, England's Road to Social Security, Perpetua: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Deacon, B. 2003, ‘Global social governance reform’, Global Social Policy, 3: 1, 6–17.Google Scholar
Dean, H. 2002a ‘Business versus families: whose side is New Labour on?’, Social Policy and Society, 1: 1, 3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dean, H. 2002b, Welfare Rights and Social Policy, Harlow: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Dean, H. 2003, ‘Reconceptualising welfare-to-work for people with multiple problems and needs’, Journal of Social Policy, 32: 3, 441–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dean, H. and Coulter, A. 2006, Work–Life Balance in a Low-Income Neighbourhood, CASEpaper 114, London: STICERD/CASE, London School of Economics.Google Scholar
Dean, H. and Shah, A. 2002, ‘Insecure families and low-paying labour markets: comments on the British experience’, Journal of Social Policy, 31: 1, 61–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department for Education and Employment 1998, Meeting the Childcare Challenge, London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Department for Trade and Industry 2000, Work and Parents: Competitiveness and Choice, London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Department for Trade and Industry 2001, The Essential Guide to Work–Life Balance, London: Department for Trade and Industry.Google Scholar
Department for Trade and Industry 2005, Families: Choice and Flexibility, London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Department for Trade and Industry 2006, National Minimum Wage: Low Pay Commission Report 2006, London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Department for Work and Pensions 2006, A New Deal for Welfare: Empowering People to Work, London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Department of Social Security 1998, New Ambitions for our Country: A New Contract for Welfare, London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Dermott, E. 2006, ‘The effect of fatherhood on men's patterns of employment: end of award report’, Economic and Social Research Council, Swindon.Google Scholar
Dex, S. 2003, Families and Work in the Twenty-first Century, Bristol: The Policy Press/JRF.Google Scholar
Dex, S. and Smith, C. 2002, The Nature and Pattern of Family-friendly Employment Policy in Britain, Bristol: The Policy Press/JRF.Google Scholar
Duncan, S. and Edwards, R. 1999, Lone Mothers, Paid Work and Gendered Moral Rationalities, Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, S. and Irwin, S. 2004, ‘The social patterning of values and rationalities: mothers' choices in combining caring and employment’, Social Policy and Society, 3: 4, 391–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dwyer, P. 2004, ‘Creeping conditionality in the UK’, Canadian Journal of Sociology, 25: 2, 261–83.Google Scholar
Eekelaar, J. 2003, ‘The end of an era?’, Journal of Family History, 28: 1, 102–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Employers for Work–Life Balance 2006, ‘Business case: the business benefits', retrieved Nov. 2006, from http://www.employersforwork-lifebalance.org.uk/business/benefits.htmGoogle Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. 1999 The Social Foundations of Post-Industrial Economies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. 2002, Why We Need a New Welfare State, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Commission 1997, The Way Forward: The European Employment Strategy, Brussels: EU.Google Scholar
European Commission 2002, Taking Stock of Five Years of the European Strategy, Brussels: EU.Google Scholar
European Commission 2006, Time to Move Up a Gear: The New Partnership for Growth and Jobs, Brussels: EU.Google Scholar
Exell, R. 2001, ‘Employment and poverty’, in Fimister, G. (ed.), Tackling Child Poverty in the UK: An End in Sight? London: Child Poverty Action Group.Google Scholar
Finch, J. 1989, Family Obligations and Social Change, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. 1994, Beyond Left and Right, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. 1998, The Third Way, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Hakim, C. 1991, Grateful slaves and self-made women: fact and fantasy in women's work orientations, European Sociological Review, 7: 2, 101–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, P. 1993, ‘Policy paradigms, social learning and the state: the case of economic policy-making in Britain’, Comparative Politics, 25: 3, 275–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamnett, C. 2002, Unequal City: London in the Global Arena, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Harkness, S. 2003, ‘The household division of labour: changes in families' allocation of paid and unpaid work, 1992–2002’, in Dickens, R., Gregg, P. and Wadsworth, J. (eds), The Labour Market under New Labour: The State of Working Britain, Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Hills, J. and Stewart, K. (eds) 2005, A More Equal Society: New Labour, Poverty, Inequality and Exclusion, Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
Himmelfarb, G. 1995, The De-Moralisation of Society, London: Institute of Economic Affairs.Google Scholar
HM Treasury 2002, Child and Working Tax Credits, Modernisation of Britain's Tax and Benefit System, London: HMT.Google Scholar
Hogarth, T., Hasluck, C. and Pierre, G. 2003, Work–Life Balance 2000: Baseline Study of Work–Life Balance Practices in Great Britain, London: Department for Education and Employment.Google Scholar
Home Office 1998, Supporting Families, London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Hooker, H., Neathey, F., Casebourne, J. and Munro, M. 2006, The Third Work–Life Balance Employees' Survey, London: Department of Trade and Industry.Google Scholar
Huston, A. 2004, ‘Childcare for low-income families: problems and promises’, in Crouter, A. and Booth, A. (eds), Work–Family Challenges for Low-Income Parents and their Children, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Hyman, J., Scholarios, D. and Baldry, C. 2005, ‘Getting on or getting by? Employee flexibility and coping strategies for home and work’, Work, Employment and Society, 19: 4, 705–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Grand, J. 2003, Motivation, Agency and Public Policy: Of Knights, Knaves, Pawns and Queens, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, J. 2002, ‘Gender and welfare state change’, European Societies, 4: 4, 331–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lødemel, I. and Trickey, H. (eds) 2000, ‘An Offer You Can't Refuse’: Workfare in International Perspective, Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
Marx, K. 1844, ‘Economic and philosophical manuscripts’, reprinted in 1975, Early Writings, Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Mead, L. (ed.) 1997, The New Paternalism: Supervisory Approaches to Poverty, Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Moss, P. 2000, ‘Uncertain start: a critical look at some of New Labour's “early years” policies’, in Dean, H., Sykes, R. and Woods, R. (eds), Social Policy Review, 12, Newcastle: Social Policy Association.Google Scholar
National Evaluation of Sure Start 2005, Implementing Local Sure Start Programmes: An In-Depth Study, London: DfES Sure Start Unit.Google Scholar
Pascall, G. 1986, Social Policy: A Feminist Analysis, London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Pierson, P. 1996, ‘The new politics of the welfare state’, World Politics, 48: 2, 143–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Presser, H. 2004, ‘Employment in a 24/7 economy: challenges for the family’, in Crouter, A. and Booth, A. (eds), Work–Family Challenges for Low-Income Parents and Their Children, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Ridge, T. and Millar, J. 2006, ‘A fine balance: managing work and family life’, Poverty, 25: 15–18.Google Scholar
Rose, N. 1999, Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scharpf, F. and Schmidt, V. (eds) 2000, Welfare and Work in the Open Economy, Vols. I and II, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sennett, R. 1998, The Corrosion of Character: The Personal Consequences of Work in the New Capitalism, New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Sevenhuijssen, S. 2000, ‘Caring in the Third Way: the relation between obligation, responsibility and care in Third Way discourse’, Critical Social Policy, 20: 1, 5–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, C. 2005, ‘Co-ordination points? A hidden factor in reconciling work and family life’, Journal of Social Policy, 34: 1, 99–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheelock, J. and Jones, K. 2002, ‘“Grandparents are the next best thing”: informal childcare for working parents in urban Britain’, Journal of Social Policy, 31: 3, 441–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, F. 2001, ‘In and beyond New Labour: towards a new political ethics of care’, Critical Social Policy, 21: 4, 467–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeandle, S., Crompton, R., Wigfield, A. and Dennett, J. 2002, Employed Carers and Family-Friendly Employment Policies, Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar