Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Trap for Women or Freedom to Choose? The Struggle over Cash for Child Care Schemes in Finland and Sweden

  • HEIKKI HIILAMO (a1) and OLLI KANGAS (a2)

Abstract

Debates on welfare reforms have revolved around institutional inertias with the emphasis on institutions as structures. We argue that political discourses work in the same vein and create continuities constraining the array of possible policy options – political frames as carriers of institutional inertia and path dependence. The data are based on political debates on child home care in Finland and Sweden. The ‘trap for women’ frame became dominant in the Swedish discourse, while in Finland ‘freedom to choose’ has been hegemonic. According to the Swedish frame, public day care offers children the best preconditions for later development and enhances social equality, whereas in Finland care at home with all its positive characteristics was contrasted with bureaucratic institutional care. The article highlights how politicians have used these hegemonic discourses to maintain the legitimacy of certain policy options.

Copyright

References

Hide All
Anttonen, A. (1999), Lasten kotihoidon tuki suomalaisessa perhepolitiikassa, Helsinki: Kansaneläkelaitos.
Beland, D. (2005), Social Security: History and Politics from the New Deal to the Privatization Debate, Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
Bergqvist, C., Borchorst, A., Christensen, A.-D., Raaum, N. and Styrkasdotter, A. (eds.) (1999), Likestilte demokratier? Kjønn og politikk i Norden, Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
Björnberg, U. (2002), ‘Ideology and choice between work and care: Swedish family policy for working parents’, Critical Social Policy, 22: 3352.
Bourdieu, P. (2003), Language and Symbolic Power, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Burestam Linder, S. (1983), Den hjärtlösa välfärdsstaten, Lund: Timbrå.
Cambell, J. (1998), ‘Institutional analysis and the role of ideas in political economy’, Theory and Society, 27: 377409.
Duvander, A.-Z., Ferrarini, T. and Thalberg, S. (2008), ‘Sweden towards a new model of family policy?’, Future International, Framtider International Edition, Stockholm: Institute for Futures Studies, Future International, available from http://www.framtidsstudier.se/eng/redirect.asp?p=2663.
Ellingsæter, A. L. (2007), ‘“Old” and “new” politics of time to care: three Norwegian reforms’, Journal of European Social Policy, 17: 4960.
Elster, J. (1993), Political Psychology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Eriksson, N. (1964), Bara en hemmafru: Ett debattinlägg om kvinnan i familjen, Stockholm: Forum.
Ervasti, H. (1996), Kenen vastuu? Helsinki: Stakes.
Fairclough, N. (1989), Language and Power, Singapore: Longman.
Fairclough, N. (1992), Discourse and Social Change, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Ferrarini, T. (2006), Families, States and Labour Markets: Institutions, Causes and Consequences of Family Policy in Post-War Welfare States, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Foucault, M. (1986), The Archaeology of Knowledge, London: Tavistock.
Frazer, N. (2003), ‘Social justice in the age of identity politics’, in Frazer, N. and Honneth, A. (eds.), Redistribution or Recognition? London: Verso.
Gamson, W. A. and Modigliani, A. (1987), ‘The changing culture of affirmative action’, Research in Political Sociology, 3: 137–77.
Gamson, W. A. and Modigliani, A. (1989), ‘Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: a constructionist approach’, American Journal of Sociology, 92: 137.
Geerts, C. (1972), The Interpretation of Cultures, New York: Basic Books.
Giddens, A. (1991), Modernity and Self-Identity, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Gornick, J. and Meyers, M. (2003), Families that Work: Policies for Reconciling Parenthood and Employment, New York: The Russell Sage Foundation.
Gramsci, A. (1971), Selections from the Prison Notebooks, London: Lawrence & Wishart.
Haataja, A. and Nyberg, A. (2006), ‘Diverging paths? The dual-earner/dual-carer model in Finland and Sweden’, in Ellingsæter, A. L. and Leira, A. (eds.), Politicising Parenthood in Scandinavia: Gender Relations in Welfare States, Bristol: Policy Press.
Hatje, A.-K. (1974), Befolkningsfrågan och välfärden: Debatten om familjepolitik och nativitetsökning under 1930- och 1940-talen, Stockholm: Allmänna Förlaget.
Hiilamo, H. (2002), The Rise and Fall of Nordic Family Policy? Historical Development and Changes during the 1990s in Sweden and Finland, Helsinki: Stakes.
Hiilamo, H. (2003), ‘Perhetuet ja pienten lasten hoito – Porvari- ja vasemmistohallitusten perhepolitiikan vertailua 1990–2003’, in Ritakallio, V.-M. (ed.), Riskit, Instituutiot ja tuotokset, Helsinki: Sosiaalipoliittinen yhdistys.
Hinnfors, J. (1992), Familjepolitik. Samhällsförändringar och partistrategier 1960–1990, Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.
Hirdman, Y. (1988), ‘Alva Myrdal – en studie i feminism’, Kvinnovetenskaplig tidskrift, 9: 1531.
Hirdman, Y. (1989), Att lägga livet till rätta – studier i svensk folkhemspolitik, Stockholm: Carlssons.
Hirdman, Y. (1997), ‘Social planning under rational control: social engineering in Sweden in the 1930s and 1940s’, in Kettunen, P. and Eskola, H. (eds.), Models, Modernity and the Myrdals, Helsinki: Renvall Institute.
Hirdman, Y. (1998), ‘State policy and gender contracts: the Swedish experience’, in Drew, E., Emerek, R. and Mahon, E. (eds.), Women, Work and the Family in Europe, New York: Routledge.
Hirdman, Y. (2006), Det tänkande hjärtat: Boken om Alva Myrdal, Stockholm: Ordfront: Stockholm.
Kangas, O. (1986), Luokkaintressit ja hyvinvointivaltio, Helsinki: Helsingin kauppakorkeakoulun julkaisuja D-84.
Korpi, W. (1978), Working Class in Welfare Capitalism: Work, Unions and Politics in Sweden, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Korpi, W. and Palme, J. (2003), ‘New politics and class politics in the context of austerity and globalization: welfare state regress in 18 countries, 1975–95’, American Political Science Review, 90: 425–46.
Kosonen, P. (1993), Pohjoismaiset mallit murroksessa, Tampere: Vastapaino.
Laclau, E. and Mouffe, C. (1985), Hegemony and Socialist Strategy, London: Verso.
Lane, J.-E. and Ersson, S. (2002), ‘The Nordic countries: contention, compromise and corporatism’, in Colomer, J.. (ed.), Political Institutions in Europe, London: Routledge.
Larsson, M. and Hägglund, G. (2007), ‘Sahlins politik blir änny mer tvingande’, Aftonbladet, 2 May.
Leira, A. (2002), Working Parents and the Welfare State: Family Change and Policy Reform in Scandinavia, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lieberman, R. C. (2002), ‘Ideas, institutions, and political order: explaining political change’, American Political Science Review, 96: 697712.
Lundberg, U. (2003), Juvelen i kronan: Socialdemokraterna och den allmänna pensionen, Stockholm: Hjalmarson & Högberg.
Lundqvist, Å. (2007), Familjen i den svenska modellen, Umeå: Borea.
Lindberg, I. (2001), Den nya familjens tid, Stockholm: LO.
Mahoney, J. (2000), ‘Path dependence in historical sociology’, Theory and Society, 29: 507–48.
Majone, G. (1989), Evidence, Argument and Persuasion in the Policy Process, New Haven: Yale University Press.
Morgan, K. J. and Zippel, K. (2003), ‘Paid to care: the origins and effects of care leave in Western Europe’, International Studies in Gender, State and Society, 10: 4995.
Nygård, M. (2003), Välfärdsstaten, partierna och marknaden: den välfärdsideologiska förändringen inom fyra finländska partier under 1990-talet, Åbo: Åbo Akademis förlag.
Nätkin, R. (1997), Kamppailu suomalaisesta äitiydestä. Maternalismi, väestöpolitiikka ja naisten kertomukset, Tampere: Gaudeamus.
Pfau-Effinger, B. (2005), ‘Culture and welfare state policies: reflections on a complex interrelation’, Journal of Social Policy, 34: 320.
Sahlin, M. (2007), ‘Nej, det cementerar ojämställdheten!’, Aftonbladet 2, May.
Sainsbury, D. (ed.) (1999), Gender and Welfare State Regimes, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sakaranaho, T. (1992), ‘Lasten kotihoidon tuki’, Unpublished Masters thesis, Department of Social Policy, University of Tampere.
de Saussure, F. (1974), Course in General Linguistics, London: Fontana.
Schmidt, V. (2002), ‘Does discourse matter in the politics of welfare state adjustment?’, Comparative Political Studies, 35: 168–93.
Spector, M. and Kitsuse, I. (1989), Constructing Social Problems, New York: DeGruyter.
Steinmo, S., Thelen, K. and Longstreth, F. (eds.) (1992), Structuring Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Streeck, W. and Thelen, K. (eds.) (2004), Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Economies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sulkunen, I. (1989), Naisen kutsumus: Miina Sillanpää ja sukupuolten maailmojen erkaantuminen, Helsinki: Hanki ja Jää.
Thelen, K. (2004), How Institutions Evolve: The Political Economy of Skills in Germany, Britain, the United States, and Japan, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Timonen, V. (2003), Restructuring the Welfare State: Globalization and Social Policy Reforms in Finland and Sweden, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Tyyskä, V. (1995), The Politics of Caring and the Welfare State, Helsinki: Finnish Academy of Science, Series B.
Weber, M. 1989 [1904–05], The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, London: Allen & Unwin.
Financial motion 569/1981.
Petitionary motion no 288/1947.
Petitionary motion no 1493/1982.
Preliminary debate protocol 4 20/1; (1965).
Motion no 98/1997: Ub211.
Socialdepartmentet (2007), ‘En valfrihetsreform för familjer snart verklighet’, Pressmeddelande 7 March.
SOU (1966): 59, Remissyttranden över 1965 års långtidsutrednings huvudrapport Svensk ekonomi 1966–1970 med utblick mot 1980, Stockholm: Statens Offentliga Utredningar.
SOU (1972):34, Familjestöd, Stockholm: Statens Offentliga Utredningar.
SOU (1994):25, Report of the Social Committee 1993/1994, Stockholm: Statens Offentliga Utredningar.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Social Policy
  • ISSN: 0047-2794
  • EISSN: 1469-7823
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-social-policy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed