Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Varieties of Employment Subsidy Design: Theory and Evidence from Across Europe

  • AXEL CRONERT (a1)

Abstract

Employment subsidy programs have experienced considerable expansion across Europe in recent decades. To date, most studies analyzing this policy shift have assumed that these programs are largely equivalent in terms of their designs, effects, and explanations. In contrast, this article argues that employment subsidies are best understood as versatile multi-purpose tools that can be used as means to rather different distributional ends. Using Multiple Correspondence Analysis to explore novel data from hundreds of employment subsidy programs across Europe, this article develops a new typology based on two overarching trade-offs. The typology highlights that employment subsidies may be designed to counteract as well as to sustain insider/outsider divides in the labor market, and that they may be designed to tackle either structural or cyclical labor market problems. In a first empirical evaluation of the typology, programs with different designs are found to vary systematically in terms of distributional outcomes and starting conditions.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Varieties of Employment Subsidy Design: Theory and Evidence from Across Europe
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Varieties of Employment Subsidy Design: Theory and Evidence from Across Europe
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Varieties of Employment Subsidy Design: Theory and Evidence from Across Europe
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

References

Hide All
Benzécri, J. (1992), Correspondence analysis handbook. New York: Marcel Dekker.
Bishop, J. and Haveman, R. (1978), Targeted employment subsidies: issues of structure and design. Madison: Institute for Research and Poverty, Wisconsin University, Madison.
Bonoli, G. (2010), ‘The political economy of active labor-market policy’, Politics & Society, 38, 4, 435457.
Bonoli, G. (2013), The origins of active social policy: labour market and childcare policies in a comparative perspective, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1979), La Distinction. Critique Sociale du Jugement. Paris: EÉditions de Minuit.
Brown, A.J. and Koettl, J. (2015), ‘Active labor market programs– employment gain or fiscal drain?’, IZA Journal of Labor Economics, 4, 12, 136.
Card, D., Kluve, J. and Weber, A. (2015), What works? A meta analysis of recent active labor market program evaluations. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Clasen, J., Clegg, D. and Goerne, A. (2016), ‘Comparative social policy analysis and active labour market policy: Putting quality before quantity’, Journal of Social Policy, 45, 1, 2138.
Clausen, S.-E. (1998), Applied correspondence analysis: an introduction. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
Cronert, A. (forthcoming), ‘Unemployment reduction or labor force expansion? How partisanship matters for the design of active labor market policy in Europe’, Socio-Economic Review, doi: 10.1093/ser/mwx014.
Cronert, A. (2018), ‘Accommodation or extraction? Employers, the state, and the joint production of active labor market policy’, Politics & Society, 46, 4, 539569.
Eichhorst, W., Kaufmann, O., Konle-Seidl, R. and Reinhard, H.-J. (2008), ‘Bringing the jobless into work? An introduction to activation policies’, In: Eichhorst, W., Kaufmann, O., and Konle-Seidl, R. (Eds.), Bringing the jobless into work? (pp. 116), Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer.
Emmenegger, P., Häusermann, S., Palier, B. and Seeleib-Kaiser, M. (2012), The age of dualization: the changing face of inequality in deindustrializing societies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
European Commission (2014), Stimulating job demand: the design of effective hiring subsidies in Europe, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
European Commission (2015), Labour market policy (source: DG EMPL), http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/cache/metadata/en/lmp_esms.htm [accessed 16.10.2017].
European Commission (2017), The AMECO database. European Commission: DG ECFIN, http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/ameco [accessed 16.10.2017].
Eurostat (2013), Labour Market Policy Statistics. Methodology 2013. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
Ferragina, E., Seeleib-Kaiser, M. and Tomlinson, M. (2013), ‘Unemployment protection and family policy at the turn of the 21st century: a dynamic approach to welfare regime theory’, Social Policy & Administration, 47, 7, 783805.
Fossati, F. (2018), ‘How regimes shape preferences. A study of political actors’ labour market policy preferences in flexicurity and dualizing countries’, Socio-Economic Review, 16, 3, 523544.
Goertz, G. (2008), Concepts, theories, and numbers: a checklist for constructing, evaluating, and using concepts or quantitative measures. In: Box-Steffensmeier, J.M., Brady, H.E., and Collier, D. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political methodology (pp. 97118), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gore, T. (2005), ‘Extending employability or solving employers’ recruitment problems? demand-led approaches as an instrument of labour market policy’, Urban Studies, 42, 2, 341353.
Grammenos, S. (2018), European comparative data on Europe 2020 & people with disabilities, Brussels: Academic Network of European Disability Experts (ANED).
Graziano, P.R. (2012), ‘Converging worlds of activation? Activation policies and governance in Europe and the role of the EU’, International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 32, 5/6, 312326.
Ingold, J. and Stuart, M. (2015), ‘The demand-side of active labour market policies: a regional study of employer engagement in the work programme’, Journal of Social Policy, 44, 3, 443462.
Jessop, B. (1993), ‘Towards a Schumpeterian workfare state? Preliminary remarks on post-fordist political economy’, Studies in Political Economy, 40, 740.
Jessop, B. (1999), ‘The changing governance of welfare: recent trends in its primary functions, scale, and modes of coordination’, Social Policy & Administration, 33, 4, 348359.
Katz, L.F. (1998), Wage subsidies for the disadvantaged. In: Freeman, R.B. and Gottschalk, P. (Eds.), Generating jobs: how to increase demand for less-skilled workers (pp. 2153), New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Le Roux, B. and Rouanet, H. (2010), Multiple correspondence analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Lindbeck, A. and Snower, D.J. (2001), ‘Insiders versus outsiders’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15, 1, 165188.
Martin, C.J. (2004), ‘Reinventing welfare regimes employers and the implementation of active social policy’, World Politics, 57, 1, 3969.
Nelson, M. (2013), ‘Making markets with active labor market policies: the influence of political parties, welfare state regimes, and economic change on spending on different types of policies’, European Political Science Review, 5, 2, 255277.
Neumark, D. (2013), ‘Reconsidering hiring credits’, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 32, 1, 142171.
OECD. (2017), Dataset: public expenditure and participant stocks on LMP. Paris: OECD. http://stats.oecd.org/ [accessed 28.01.2017].
Ragazzi, F. (2014), ‘A comparative analysis of diaspora policies’, Political Geography, 41, 7489.
Rueda, D. (2006), ‘Social democracy and active labour-market policies: insiders, outsiders and the politics of employment promotion’, British Journal of Political Science, 36, 3, 385406.
van Oorschot, W. (2000), ‘Who should get what, and why? On deservingness criteria and the conditionality of solidarity among the public’, Policy & Politics, 28, 1, 3348.
Thelen, K. (2014), Varieties of liberalization and the new politics of social solidarity, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Van der Aa, P. and Van Berkel, R. (2014), ‘Innovating job activation by involving employers’, International Social Security Review, 67, 2, 1127.
Vlandas, T. (2013), ‘Mixing apples with oranges? Partisanship and active labour market policies in Europe’, Journal of European Social Policy, 23, 1, 320.
Weishaupt, T.J. (2011), From the manpower revolution to the activation paradigm: explaining institutional continuity and change in an integrating Europe, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO
Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary materials

Cronert supplementary material
Appendix

 Word (163 KB)
163 KB

Varieties of Employment Subsidy Design: Theory and Evidence from Across Europe

  • AXEL CRONERT (a1)

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.