Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Who Wants Demanding Active Labour Market Policies? Public Attitudes towards Policies that put Pressure on the Unemployed

  • FLAVIA FOSSATI (a1)
Abstract
Abstract

The literature addressing attitudes about social policy and the welfare state has been telling us for decades that welfare interventions are supported by those individuals who benefit from a specific measure. The diffusion of ‘demanding’ active labour market policies (ALMPs), however, challenges this relationship. Using a novel dataset, I analyse which individual- and country-level factors explain public support for demanding ALMPs in five Western European countries. The results show that labour market risk and ideological orientation influence public attitudes towards these ALMPs. Thereby, unemployed individuals sympathising with the political right are more strongly opposed to demanding measures than employed individuals with the same political preferences. Moreover, aggregate support is found to be correlated with the country's ALMP legacy, varying from high levels in Germany and the UK to low levels in Denmark and France. The findings suggest that most ALMPs are in fact implemented despite the opposition of their beneficiaries.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Who Wants Demanding Active Labour Market Policies? Public Attitudes towards Policies that put Pressure on the Unemployed
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Who Wants Demanding Active Labour Market Policies? Public Attitudes towards Policies that put Pressure on the Unemployed
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Who Wants Demanding Active Labour Market Policies? Public Attitudes towards Policies that put Pressure on the Unemployed
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
References
Hide All
Andress H. and Heien T. (2001), ‘Four worlds of welfare state attitudes? A comparison of Germany, Norway, and the United States’, European Sociological Review, 17, 337356.
Arni P., Lalive R. and van Ours J.C. (2013), ‘How effective are unemployment benefit sanctions? Looking beyond unemployment exit’, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 28, 7, 1153–78.
Arts W. and Gelissen J. (2001), ‘Welfare states, solidarity and justice principles: Does the type really matter?’, Acta Sociologica, 44, 4, 283299.
Barbier J.-C. and Ludwig-Mayerhofer W. (2004), ‘Introduction: the many worlds of activation’, European Societies, 6, 4, 423–36.
Barbier J.-C. & Fargion V. (2004), ‘Continental inconsistencies on the path to activation’, European Societies, 6, 4, 437460.
Baslevent C. & Kirmanoglu H. (2011), ‘Discerning self-interested behaviour in attitudes towards welfare state responsibilities across Europe’, International Journal of Social Welfare, 20, 4, 344352.
Berrens R.P., Bohara A.K., Jenkins-Smith H., Silva C. and Weimer D.L. (2003), ‘The advent of internet surveys for political research: A comparison of telephone and internet samples’, Political Analysis, 11, 1, 122.
Blekesaune M. and Quadagno J. (2003), ‘Public attitudes toward welfare state politics: a comparative analysis of 24 nations’, European Sociological Review, 19, 5, 415–27.
Bonoli G. and Häusermann S. (2009), ‘Who wants what from the welfare state?’, European Societies, 11 (2): 211232.
Bonoli G. (2010), ‘The political economy of active labour-market policy’, Politics and Society, 38, 4, 435–57.
Bonoli G. (2013), The Origins of Active Social Policy. Labour Market and Child Care Policies in a Comparative Perspective, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bonoli G. and Natali D. (2012), The Politics of the “New” Welfare State: Analysing Reforms in Western Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brand J.E. (2015), ‘The Far-Reaching Impact of Job Loss and Unemployment’, Annual Review of Sociology, 41, 1, 359375.
Brooks C. and Manza J. (2006), ‘Social Policy Responsiveness in Developed Democracies’, American Sociological Review, 71, 3, 474–94.
Clasen J. and Clegg D. (2011), ‘The transformation of unemployment protection in Europe’, in Clasen J., and Clegg D. (eds.), Regulating the Risk of Unemployment. National Adaptations to Post-Industrial Labour Markets in Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Clasen J., Clegg D. and Goerne A. (2016), ‘Comparative Social Policy Analysis and Active Labour Market Policy: Putting Quality before Quantity’, Journal of Social Policy, 45, 1, 2138.
Daguerre A. (2007), Active Labour Market Policies and Welfare Reform. Europe and the US in Comparative Perspective, Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Daguerre A. and Taylor-Gooby P. (2004), ‘Neglecting Europe: explaining the predominance of American ideas in New Labour's welfare policies since 1997’, Journal of European Social Policy, 14,1, 2539
De Bell M. and Krosnick J.A. (2009), ‘Computing Weights for American National Election Study Survey Data’, ANES Technical Report Series, no. nes012427, Ann Arbor/Palo Alto: American National Election Studies.
Edlund J. (1999), ‘Trust in government and welfare regimes: Attitudes to redistribution and financial cheating in the USA and Norway’, European Journal of Political Research, 35, 3, 341370.
Eichhorst W. and Marx P. (2011), ‘Reforming German labour market institutions: A dual path to flexibility’, Journal of European Social Policy, 21, 1, 7387.
Eichhorst W. and Konle-Seidl R. (2008), ‘Contingent Convergence: A Comparative Analysis of Activation Policies’, IZA Discussion Paper Series, No. 3905.
Emmenegger P., Marx P. and Schraff D. (2015), ‘Labour market disadvantage, political orientations and voting: how adverse labour market experiences translate into electoral behaviour’, Socio-Economic Review, 2015, 125.
Esping-Andersen G. (1990), Three Worlds of Welfare State Capitalism, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
European Social Survey Round 4 Data (2008), ‘Data file edition 4.4. NSD’, Norwegian Centre for Research Data, Norway – Data Archive and distributor of ESS data for ESS ERIC.
Feldman S. and Steenbergen M.R. (2001), ‘The Humanitarian Foundation of Public Support for Social Welfare’, American Journal of Political Science, 45, 3, 658677.
Ferrera M. (1993), Modelli di solidarietà. Politica e riforme sociali nelle democrazie, Bologna: Mulino.
Fleckenstein T. (2012), ‘The politics of labour market reforms and Social citizenship in Germany’, West European Politics, 35, 4, 847–68.
Forma P. (1997), ‘The Rational Legitimacy of the Welfare State: Popular Support for ten income transfer schemes in Finland’, Policy and Politics, 25, 235249.
Giddens A. (2000), The Third Way. The Renewal of Social Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Gilbert N. (2002), Transformation of the Welfare State. The Silent Surrender of Public Responsibility, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Glass J., Bengtson V.L. and Dunham C.C. (1986), ‘Attitude Similarity in Three-Generation Families: Socialization, Status Inheritance, or Reciprocal Influence?’, American Sociological Review, 51, 5, 685698.
Handler J.F. (2003), ‘Social citizenship and workfare in the US and Western Europe: from status to contract’, Journal of European Social Policy, 13, 3, 229–43.
Hasenfeld Y. and Rafferty J.A. (1989), ‘The determinants of public attitudes toward the welfare state’, Social Forces, 67, 4, 1027–48.
Häusermann S., Kurer T. and Schwander H. (2014), ‘High-skilled outsiders? Labor market vulnerability, education and welfare state preferences’, Socio-Economic Review, 13, 2, 235258.
Hvinden B. and Johansson H. (2007), ‘Conclusion. Remaking social citizenship in the Nordic welfare states’, in Hvinden B., and Johansson H. (eds), Citizenship in Nordic Welfare States. Dynamics of choice, duties and participation in a changing Europe, Abingdon/New York: Routledge, 216225.
Jaeger M.M. (2009), ‘United but Divided: Welfare Regimes and the Level and Variance in Public Support for Redistribution’, European Sociological Review, 25, 6, 723727.
King D.S. (1995), Actively Seeking Work? The Politics of Unemployment and Welfare Policy in the United States and Great Britain, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Knotz C. (2014), ‘Any Job Is A Good Job? The Development of Conditions and Sanctions for the Unemployed in OECD Countries, 1980-2012’, presented at InGRID Expert Workshop On ‘Development and Dissemination of Social Policy Indicators’, Stockholm, November 19-21.
Korpi W. (1983), The Democratic Class Struggle, Boston: Routledge.
Kriesi H., Fossati F., Bernhard L. and Hänggli R. (2017), ‘The variety of national debates’, in Bernhard L., Kriesi H., Fossati F. and Hänggli R. (eds.), Shaping the Debate on how to Fight Unemployment. A Comparative Analysis of the Political Communication Strategies on Labour Market Policies in Western Europe, manuscript University of Zurich.
Krosnick J.A. (1991), ‘Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys’, Applied Cognitive Psychology, 5, 3, 213–36.
Kulin J. and Meuleman B. (2015), ‘Human Values and Welfare State Support in Europe: An East–. West Divide?’, European Sociological Review, 31, 5, 418432.
Kumlin S. (2004), The Personal and the Political: How Personal Welfare State Experiences Affect Political Trust and Ideology, New York: Palgrave McMillan.
Larsen C.A. (2007), ‘The institutional logic of welfare attitudes: how welfare regimes influence public support’, Comparative Political Studies, 41, 2, 145–68.
Lødemel I. and Trickey H. (2001), An Offer You Can't Refuse: Workfare in International Perspective, London: The Policy Press.
Margalit Y. (2013), ‘Explaining social policy preferences: evidence from the great recession’, American Political Science Review, 107, 1, 80103.
May M. and Schwanholz J. (2013), ‘Vom gerechten Weg abgekommen? Bewertungen von Hartz IV durch die Bevölkerung’, Zeitschrift für Sozialreform, 59, 2, 197226.
Naumann E., Buss C. and Bähr J. (2015), ‘How Unemployment Experience Affects Support for the Welfare State: A Real Panel Approach’, European Sociological Review, 32, 1, 8192.
Nelson M. (2013), ‘Making markets with active labor market policies: the influence of political parties, welfare state regimes, and economic change on spending on different types of policies’, European Political Science Review, 5, 2, 255–77.
Nicaise I., Bollens J. and Dawes L. (1995), ‘Pitfalls and Dilemmas in Labour Market Policies for Disadvantaged Groups - and how to Avoid them’, Journal of European Social Policy 5, 3, 199217.
Pierson P. (1996), ‘The New politics of the welfare state’, World Politics, 48, 2, 143–79.
Price R.H., Choi J.N. and Vinokur A.D. (2002), ‘Links in the chain of adversity following job loss: how financial strain and loss of personal control lead to depression, impaired functioning, and poor health’, Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 7, 4, 302–12.
Rehm P. (2011), ‘Social policy by Popular demand’, World Politics, 63, 2, 271–99.
Rueda D. (2007), Social democracy inside out. Partisanship and Labor Market Policy in Advanced Industrialized Democracies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sax L.J., Gilmartin S.K. and Bryant A.N. (2003), ‘Assessing response rates and nonresponse bias in web and paper surveys’, Research in Higher Education, 44, 4, 409–32.
Schemer C. and Wirth W. (2013), Methodological Issues, Manuscript, University of Zurich.
Scholzman K.L. and Verba S. (1979), Injury to insult. Unemployment, Class and and Political Response, Cambridge/London: Harvard University Press.
Schmidt V. A. (2002), ‘Does Discourse Matter in the Politics of Welfare State Adjustment?’, Comparative Political Studies, 35, 2, 168193.
Stegmueller D., Scheepers P., Rossteutscher S. and de Jong E. (2012), ‘Support for Redistribution in Western Europe: Assessing the role of religion’, European Sociological Review, 28, 4, 482497.
Stryker S. (1980), Symbolic Interactionism: A Social Structural Version, Menlo Park: Benjamin/Cummings Publishing.
Svallfors S. (1997), ‘Worlds of welfare and attitudes to redistribution: A comparison of eight western nations’, European Sociological Review, 13, 3, 283304.
Svarer M. (2011), ‘The effect of sanctions on exit from unemployment: evidence from Denmark’, Economica, 78, 312, 751–78.
Tepe M. and Vanhuysse P. (2013), ‘Parties, Unions and Activation Strategies: The Context-Dependent Politics of Active Labour Market Policy Spending’, Political Studies, 61, 3, 480504.
Torfing J. (1999), ‘Towards a Schumpeterian workfare post national regime: path-shaping and path-dependency in Danish welfare state reform’, Economy and Society, 28, 3, 369402.
van Oorschot W. (2006), ‘Making the difference in social Europe: deservingness perceptions among citizens of European welfare states’, Journal of European Social Policy, 16, 1, 2342.
Vlandas T. (2013), ‘Mixing apples with oranges? Partisanship and active labour market policies in Europe’, Journal of European Social Policy, 23, 1, 320.
Wanberg C.R. (2012), ‘The individual experience of unemployment’, Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 369–96.
Westholm A. (1991), The Political Heritage: Testing Theories of Family Socialization and Generational Change, Uppsala: Statsvetenskapliga institutionen.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Social Policy
  • ISSN: 0047-2794
  • EISSN: 1469-7823
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-social-policy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary materials

Fossati supplementary material S2
Supplementary Table

 Word (13 KB)
13 KB
WORD
Supplementary materials

Fossati supplementary material S1
Supplementary Figure

 Word (97 KB)
97 KB
WORD
Supplementary materials

Fossati supplementary material S4
Supplementary Table

 Word (16 KB)
16 KB
WORD
Supplementary materials

Fossati supplementary material S3
Supplementary Table

 Word (13 KB)
13 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 88
Total number of PDF views: 249 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 725 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 5th April 2017 - 22nd January 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.