Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T19:32:36.170Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Malacca Fort

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

Get access

Extract

There was a stone fort at Malacca from 1512 to 1807. Only twice during the three centuries of its existence did this fort change hands, and it was taken by storm only once. Yet it was many times besieged, and nations which did not possess it regarded it with disfavour as a threat to the security of their communications and a hindrance, if not a barrier, to the freedom of their trade. In relation to the Malay Peninsula the fort at Malacca was of small account, for it was never used as a base for the furthering of territorial ambitions in the interior. Its importance lay rather in its. position on the flank of the main sea route between India and China. Beneath its guns fleets could be assembled and lie at anchor in security, and these fleets could be, and were, employed to attack the shipping of rival powers passing through Malacca Straits.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The National University of Singapore 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Cortesão, A. (Ed.), The Suma Oriental of Tomé Pires, I (London 1944), p. 286.Google Scholar

2. Ibid., p. 287.

* And see text, pp. 25–26.

3. ‘Berigt van Commissaris Justus [Joost] Schouten,’ in Leupe, P. A., ‘Stukkern betrekkelijk het beleg en de verovering van Malakka op de Portugezen in 1640–1641,’ Berigten van het Historisch Genootschap te Utrecht (1859), p. 287.Google Scholar

4. Macgregor, I. A., ‘Johore Lama in the sixteenth century,’ JRASMB, XXVIII, 2 (05 1955), pp. 65 and 70, n. 87.Google Scholar

5. Macgregor, , ‘Johore Lama,’ p. 9.Google ScholarCardon, R., ‘Portuguese Malacca,’ JRASMB XII, 2 (08 1934), pp. 1314.Google Scholar

6. Maxwell, W. G., ‘Gardinho de Eredia's Declaracam de Malaca,’ JRASSB, 60 (12 1911), p. 20.Google ScholarCardon, , op. cit., p. 16.Google ScholarBlagden, C. O. (Ed.), ‘Report of Governor Balthasar Bort on Malacca, 1678,’ JRASMB, V, 1 (08 1927), p. 39.Google Scholar

7. Wright, J. W., The development of the bastioned system of permanent fortification, 1500–1800 (Washington 1946), pp. iiiii.Google Scholar

8. Macgregor, I. A., ‘Notes on the Portuguese in Malaya,’ JRASMB, XXVIII, 2 (05 1955), p. 38.Google Scholar

9. Boxer, C. R. and de Azevedo, Carlos, Fort Jesus and the Portuguese in Mombasa 1593–1729 (London 1960), pp. 91 and 93–4.Google Scholar

10. Cardon, , op. cit., p. 21.Google Scholar

11. ‘Gardinho de Eredia's Declaracam de Malaca,’ pp. 20–1.Google Scholar

12. Wright, , op. cit., p. 7.Google Scholar

13. Reproduced in Macgregor, , ‘Notes on the Portuguese in Malaya,’ p. 40.Google Scholar

14. Albion, R. G., Introduction to military history (New York 1929), p. 79.Google Scholar

15. SirWinstedt, Richard, A history of Malaya (Singapore 1935), pp. 7882.Google Scholar

16. Stapel, F. W. (Ed.), Geschiedenis van Nederlandsch Indië, III (Amsterdam 1939), pp. 54–5.Google Scholar

17. Macleod, N., De Oost-lndische Compagnie als zeemogendheid in Azié, I (Rijswijk 1927), pp. 75 and 146–7.Google Scholar

18. Coolhaas, W.Ph. (Ed.), Jan Pietersz. Coen. Bescheiden omtrent zijn bedrijf in Indië, VII, 1 ('s-Gravenhage 1952), p. 65.Google Scholar

19. Ive, Paul, The practise of fortification: wherein is shewed the manner of fortifying in all sorts of scitualions (London 1589), p. 8.Google Scholar

20. Macgregor, , ‘Notes on the Portuguese in Malaya,’ pp. 33–4.Google Scholar

21. Leupe, , op. cit., pp. 144 and 147.Google Scholar

22. Maxwell, W. G., ‘Barretto de Resende's account of Malacca,’ JRASSB, 60 (12 1911), p. 3.Google ScholarLeupe, , op. cit., pp. 210 and 287–8.Google ScholarCoolhaas, , op. cit., pp. 45–6.Google Scholar

23. Coolhaas, , op. cit., p. 685.Google Scholar

24. Leupe, , op. cit., pp. 287–8.Google Scholar

25. ‘Barretto de Resende's account of Malacca,’ p. 6.Google Scholar

26. Cardon, , op. cit., pp. 1011.Google Scholar Dagh-Register, 28 September 1640. (Heeres, J. E. and others (Eds.), Dagh-Register gehouden int Casteel Batavia, 's-Gravenhage, 1896Google Scholar, etc. Throughout this paper citations to this source are given by indicating the date of each particular entry.)

27. Dagh-Register, 10 September 1640 and 24 January 1641.

28. Generale Missive, 30 November 1641.

29. Dagh-Register, 10 September 1640.

30. Dagh-Register, 28 September 1640.

31. Dagh-Register, 28 September, 22 October and 14 November 1640 and 15 January 1641.

32. Dagh-Register, 24 January 1641.

33. Generate Missive, 12 December 1641. Leupe, op. cit., p. 243.

34. Dagh-Register, 10 February 1641.

35. Leupe, , op. cit., pp. 248–9, 251 and 256.Google Scholar Apart from VICTORIA and AMSTERDAM all bastions, angles and half-angles of Malacca Fort were named after members of the House of Orange: EMILIA after Emilia (Amalia, Amelia) von Solms, wife of the Stadholder Frederick Henry; HENRICA LOUISA after Henriette Louise, daughter of the same prince and subsequently wife of the Elector Frederick William of Brandenburg; WILHELMUS after William the Silent; MAURITS after Maurice of Nassau; PRINS HENRIK after Stadholder Frederick Henry; and ERNESTUS after Ernest-Casimir, Count of Nassau. (See Overvoorde, J. C., ‘Hollandsche herinneringen te Malaka,’ Oudheidkundig Jaarboek (1923), pp. 168–9.)Google Scholar

36. Ive, , op. cit., p. 3.Google Scholar

37. Wright, , op. cit., pp. 36 and 68.Google Scholar

38. SirClarke, G. W., Fortification (London 1907), p. 7.Google Scholar

39. Leupe, , op. cit., p. 322.Google Scholar

40. Ibid., pp. 350–1.

41. Generate Missive, 4 December 1656.

42. Fage, J. D. (Ed.), ‘A new check list of the forts and castles of Ghana,’ Trans. Hist. Soc. Ghana, IV, 1 (1959), p. 61.Google Scholar

43. Varley, W. J., ‘The castles and forts of the Gold Coast’, Trans. Gold Coast and Togoland Hist. Soc, I, 1 (1952), p. 8.Google Scholar

44. Generale Missive, 16 December 1659.

45. van Resandt, W. Wijnaendts, De gezaghebbers der Oost-Indische Compagnie op hare buiten-comptoiren in Azië (Amsterdam 1944), pp. 55 and 203–4.Google Scholar

46. Dagh-Register, 22 May 1663.

47. Generate Resolutiën van het Kasteel Batavia, 11 October 1663.

48. Dagh-Register, 5 December 1663.

49. Generate Missive, 27 January 1664.

50. Generate Missive, 25 January 1667.

51. van Dam, Pieter, Beschryvinghe van de Oostindische Compagnie (Ed. Stapel, F. W.), II, 1 ('s-Gravenhage 1927), pp. 336–7.Google Scholar

52. van Resandt, Wijnaendts, op. cit., p. 205.Google Scholar

53. Blagden, C. O. (Ed.), ‘Report of Governor Balthasar Bort on Malacca, 1678,’ JRASMB, á, 1 (08 1927), pp. 9205.Google Scholar

54. Ibid., pp. 16–17.

55. Generate Missive, 31 January 1675. ‘Report of Governor Balthasar Bort,’ pp. 1819.Google Scholar

56. Cited in Boulger, D. C., The life of Sir Stamford Raffles, (London 1897), p. 60.Google Scholar

57. Hill, A. H. (Ed. and Trans.), ‘The Hikayat Abdullah,’ JRASMB, XXVIII, 3 (06 1955), pp. 62–3.Google Scholar

page 44 note 1. Rijport.

page 44 note 2. Boompagter.