Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-7f7b94f6bd-8mfwn Total loading time: 0.227 Render date: 2022-06-29T04:49:37.713Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true
  • English
The Journal of Symbolic Logic The Journal of Symbolic Logic

Article contents

Cardinal preserving ideals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Moti Gitik  and
Saharon Shelah
Moti Gitik
Affiliation:
School of Mathematical Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
Saharon Shelah
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem. Israel, E-mail: shelah@math.huji.ac.il
Get access Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We give some general criteria, when κ-complete forcing preserves largeness properties—like κ-presaturation of normal ideals on λ (even when they concentrate on small cofinalities). Then we quite accurately obtain the consistency strength “NSλ is αi-preserving”, for λ > α2.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Symbolic Logic , Volume 64 , Issue 4 , December 1999 , pp. 1527 - 1551
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Avraham, U., Isomorphism of Aronszajn trees, Ph.D. thesis, Jerusalem, 1979.Google Scholar
[2]Baumgartner, J., Independence results in set theory, Notices of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 25 (1978), pp. A 248–249.Google Scholar
[3]Baumgartner, J. and Taylor, A., Ideals in generic extensions, II, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 271 (1982), pp. 587–609.Google Scholar
[4]Galvin, F., Jech, T., and Magidor, M., An ideal game, this Journal, vol. 43 (1978), pp. 284–292.Google Scholar
[5]Gitik, M., The nonstationary ideal on α2, Israel Journal of Mathematics, vol. 48 (1984), pp. 257–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Gitik, M., Changing cofinalities and the nonstationary ideal, Israel Journal of Mathematics, vol. 56 (1986), pp. 280–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Gitik, M., ¬SCH from O(κ) = κ++, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 43 (1989), pp. 209–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Gitik, M., On generic elementary embeddings, this Journal, vol. 54 (1989), no. 3, pp. 700–707.Google Scholar
[9]Gitik, M., Some results on the nonstationary ideal, Israel Journal of Mathematics, vol. 92 (1995), pp. 61–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Gitik, M., Some results on the nonstationary ideal II, Israel Journal of Mathematics, vol. 99 (1997), pp. 175–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Gitik, M., On clubs consisting of former regulars, this Journal, vol. 64 (1999), pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
[12]Harrington, L. and Shelah, S., Equiconsistency results in set theory, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, vol. 26 (1985), no. 2, pp. 178–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Jech, T., Magidor, M., Mitchell, W., and Prikry, K., Precipitous ideals, this Journal, vol. 45 (1980), pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
[14]Mitchell, W., The core model for sequence of measures II, preprint.Google Scholar
[15]Mitchell, W., The core model for sequences of measures I, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philisophical Society, vol. 95 (1984), pp. 229–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Mitchell, W., Indiscernibles, skies and ideals, Contemporary Mathematics, vol. 31 (1984), pp. 161–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17]Shelah, S., Proper forcing, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, no. 940, Springer-Verlag, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18]Shelah, S., Some notes on iterated forcing with 2α0 > α2, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, vol. 29 (1988), pp. 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Cardinal preserving ideals
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Cardinal preserving ideals
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Cardinal preserving ideals
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *