Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 June 2020
There is a Turing computable embedding $\Phi $ of directed graphs
$\mathcal {A}$ in undirected graphs (see [15]). Moreover, there is a fixed tuple of formulas that give a uniform effective interpretation; i.e., for all directed graphs
$\mathcal {A}$, these formulas interpret
$\mathcal {A}$ in
$\Phi (\mathcal {A})$. It follows that
$\mathcal {A}$ is Medvedev reducible to
$\Phi (\mathcal {A})$ uniformly; i.e.,
$\mathcal {A}\leq _s\Phi (\mathcal {A})$ with a fixed Turing operator that serves for all
$\mathcal {A}$. We observe that there is a graph G that is not Medvedev reducible to any linear ordering. Hence, G is not effectively interpreted in any linear ordering. Similarly, there is a graph that is not interpreted in any linear ordering using computable
$\Sigma _2$ formulas. Any graph can be interpreted in a linear ordering using computable
$\Sigma _3$ formulas. Friedman and Stanley [4] gave a Turing computable embedding L of directed graphs in linear orderings. We show that there is no fixed tuple of
$L_{\omega _1\omega }$-formulas that, for all G, interpret the input graph G in the output linear ordering
$L(G)$. Harrison-Trainor and Montalbán [7] have also shown this, by a quite different proof.