Hostname: page-component-857557d7f7-ms8jb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-12-11T05:52:09.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

DECOMPOSITION OF GÖDEL NUMBERINGS INTO MINIMAL NUMBERINGS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2025

MARAT FAIZRAHMANOV*
Affiliation:
KAZAN FEDERAL UNIVERSITY RUSSIA

Abstract

This article studies the question of which classes of numberings can be generated by the direct sums of computable uniformly minimal sequences of numberings (in particular, Friedberg and positive numberings). For the class of Friedberg numberings, this question was initiated by Britta Schinzel in her 1982 paper. In this article, we show that the class of Gödel numberings is generated by the direct sums of computable uniformly positive sequences of universal numberings and that there exists a conull class of oracles computing sequences of Friedberg numberings with programmable direct sums. We further show that all computable numberings of a fairly wide class of families of total recursive functions (containing, for example, the family of all primitive recursion functions) are generated by the direct sums of computable sequences of their incomparable Friedberg numberings. On the other hand we prove that no family of partial recursive functions has a computable sequence of Friedberg numberings whose direct sum is acceptable.

Information

Type
Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Association for Symbolic Logic

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Badaev, S. A., On minimal enumerations . Siberian Advances in Mathematics, vol. 2 (1992), no. 1, pp. 130.Google Scholar
Badaev, S. A. and Goncharov, S. S., Generalized computable universal numberings . Algebra and Logic, vol. 53 (2014), no. 5, pp. 355364.Google Scholar
Ershov, Y. L., On computable enumerations . Algebra and Logic, vol. 7 (1968), no. 5, pp. 330346.Google Scholar
Ershov, Y. L., Theory of Numberings, Nauka, Moscow, 1977. (Russian)Google Scholar
Ershov, Y. L., Theory of numberings , Handbook of Computability Theory, vol. 140 (Griffor, E. R., editor), Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, Elsevier, New York, 1999, pp. 473503.Google Scholar
Friedberg, R. M., Three theorems on recursive enumeration. I. Decomposition. II. Maximal set. III. Enumeration without duplication . The Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 23 (1958), no. 3, pp. 309316.Google Scholar
Harris, K. $\eta$ -representation of sets and degrees . The Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 73 (2008), no. 4, pp. 10971121.Google Scholar
Jain, S. and Nessel, J., Some independence results for control structures in complete numberings . Theory of Numberings, vol. 66 (2001), no. 1, pp. 357382.Google Scholar
Kalimullin, I., Khoussainov, B., and Melnikov, A., Limitwise monotonic sequences and degree spectra of structures . Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 141 (2013), no. 9, pp. 32753289.Google Scholar
Kautz, S. M., Degrees of random sets, Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University, 1991.Google Scholar
Khisamiev, N. G., Constructive abelian groups , Handbook of Recursive Mathematics, vol. 139 , (Ershov, Y. L., Goncharov, S. S., Nerode, A., Remmel, J. B., and Marek, V. W., editors), Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, Elsevier, New York, 1998, pp. 11771231.Google Scholar
Khoussainov, B., Nies, A., and Shore, R. A., Computable models of theories with few models . Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, vol. 38 (1997), no. 2, pp. 165178.Google Scholar
Khutoretskii, A. B., On the reducibility of computable numerations . Algebra and Logic, vol. 8 (1969), no. 2, pp. 145151.Google Scholar
Kummer, M., A note on direct sums of Friedbergnumberings . Theory of Numberings, vol. 54 (1989), no. 3, pp. 10091010.Google Scholar
Kummer, M., An easy priority-free proof of a theorem of Friedberg . Theoretical Computer Science, vol. 74 (1990), no. 2, pp. 249251.Google Scholar
Machtey, M. and Young, P., An Introduction to the General Theory of Algorithms, second ed., Elsevier Science Inc., New York, 1978.Google Scholar
Martin, D. A., Measure, category, and degrees of unsolvability , Unpublished manuscript, 1967.Google Scholar
Miller, W. and Martin, D. A., The degrees of hyperimmune sets . Mathematical Logic Quarterly, vol. 14 (1968), pp. 159166.Google Scholar
Pour-El, M. B., Gödel numberings versus Friedberg numberings . Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 15 (1964), no. 2, pp. 252256.Google Scholar
Riccardi, G. A., The independence of control structures in absract programming systems, Ph.D. dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo, 1980.Google Scholar
Riccardi, G. A., The independence of control structures in abstract programming systems . Journal of Computer and System Sciences, vol. 22 (1981), no. 2, pp. 107143.Google Scholar
Riccardi, G. A., The independence of control structures in programmable numberings of the partial recursive functions . Mathematical Logic Quarterly, vol. 28 (1982), nos. 20–21, pp. 285296.Google Scholar
Rogers, H., Gödel numberings of partial recursive functions . Theory of Numberings, vol. 23 (1958), no. 3, pp. 331341.Google Scholar
Rogers, H., Theory of Recursive Functions and Effective Computability, The MIT Press, Cambridge, 1987.Google Scholar
Schinzel, B., On decomposition of Gödelnumberings into Friedbergnumberings . Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 47 (1982), no. 2, pp. 267274.Google Scholar
Soare, R. I., Turing Computability. Theory and Applications of Computability, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2016.Google Scholar