Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-559fc8cf4f-xbbwl Total loading time: 2.77 Render date: 2021-02-25T05:10:09.995Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }

DOP and FCP in generic structures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

John T. Baldwin
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Statistics and Computer Science M/C 249, University of Illinoisat Chicago, 851 S. Morgan, Chicago, Illinois 60607, USA, E-mail: jbaldwin@uic.edu Department of Mathematics, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
Saharon Shelah
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08903, USA, E-mail: shelah@sunrise.huji.ac.il
Corresponding

Extract

We work throughout in a finite relational language L. This paper is built on [2] and [3]. We repeat some of the basic notions and results from these papers for the convenience of the reader but familiarity with the setup in the first few sections of [3] is needed to read this paper. Spencer and Shelah [6] constructed for each irrational α between 0 and 1 the theory Tα as the almost sure theory of random graphs with edge probability n−α. In [2] we proved that this was the same theory as the theory Tα built by constructing a generic model in [3]. In this paper we explore some of the more subtle model theoretic properties of this theory. We show that Tα has the dimensional order property and does not have the finite cover property.

We work in the framework of [3] so probability theory is not needed in this paper. This choice allows us to consider a wider class of theories than just the Tα. The basic facts cited from [3] were due to Hrushovski [4]; a full bibliography is in [3]. For general background in stability theory see [1] or [5].

We work at three levels of generality. The first is given by an axiomatic framework in Context 1.10. Section 2 is carried out in this generality. The main family of examples for this context is described in Example 1.3. Sections 3 and 4 depend on a function δ assigning a real number to each finite L-structure as in these examples. Some of the constructions in Section 3 (labeled at the time) use heavily the restriction of the class of examples to graphs. The first author acknowledges useful discussions on this paper with Sergei Starchenko.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

[1]Baldwin, J. T., Fundamentals of stability theory, Springer-Verlag, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Baldwin, J. T. and Shelah, S., Randomness and semigenericity, to appear in Transactions of the American Mathematical Sorefy.Google Scholar
[3]Baldwin, J. T. and Shi, Niandong, Stable generic structures, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 79 (1996), pp. 135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Hrushovski, E., A stable ℵ0-categoricalpseudoplane, preprint, 1988.Google Scholar
[5]Shelah, S., Classification theory and the number of nonisomorphic models, second ed., North-Holland, 1991.Google Scholar
[6]Shelah, S. and Spencer, J., Zero-one laws for sparse random graphs, Journal of American Mathematical Society, vol. 1 (1988), pp. 97115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 14 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 25th February 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

DOP and FCP in generic structures
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

DOP and FCP in generic structures
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

DOP and FCP in generic structures
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *