No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 April 2025
A first-order expansion of  $(\mathbb {R},+,<)$ is dp-minimal if and only if it is o-minimal. We prove analogous results for algebraic closures of finite fields, p-adic fields, ordered abelian groups with only finitely many convex subgroups (in particular archimedean ordered abelian groups), and abelian groups equipped with archimedean cyclic group orders. The latter allows us to describe unary definable sets in dp-minimal expansions of
$(\mathbb {R},+,<)$ is dp-minimal if and only if it is o-minimal. We prove analogous results for algebraic closures of finite fields, p-adic fields, ordered abelian groups with only finitely many convex subgroups (in particular archimedean ordered abelian groups), and abelian groups equipped with archimedean cyclic group orders. The latter allows us to describe unary definable sets in dp-minimal expansions of  $(\mathbb {Z},+,S)$, where S is a cyclic group order. Along the way we describe unary definable sets in dp-minimal expansions of ordered abelian groups. In the last section we give a canonical correspondence between dp-minimal expansions of
$(\mathbb {Z},+,S)$, where S is a cyclic group order. Along the way we describe unary definable sets in dp-minimal expansions of ordered abelian groups. In the last section we give a canonical correspondence between dp-minimal expansions of  $(\mathbb {Q},+,<)$ and o-minimal expansions
$(\mathbb {Q},+,<)$ and o-minimal expansions  ${\mathscr R}$ of
${\mathscr R}$ of  $(\mathbb {R},+,<)$ such that
$(\mathbb {R},+,<)$ such that  $({\mathscr R},\mathbb {Q})$ is a “dense pair.”.
$({\mathscr R},\mathbb {Q})$ is a “dense pair.”.
 $p$
-adic fields
. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 39 (1988), no. 1, pp. 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
$p$
-adic fields
. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 39 (1988), no. 1, pp. 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar $p$
-minimal fields
. Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 68 (2003), no. 1, pp. 153–162.10.2178/jsl/1045861509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
$p$
-minimal fields
. Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 68 (2003), no. 1, pp. 153–162.10.2178/jsl/1045861509CrossRefGoogle Scholar $\left(\mathbb{Z},+,0\right)$
. Fundamenta Mathematicae, vol. 242 (2018), no. 3, pp. 267–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
$\left(\mathbb{Z},+,0\right)$
. Fundamenta Mathematicae, vol. 242 (2018), no. 3, pp. 267–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar ${Q}_p$
et R. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 106 (1989), no. 1, pp. 193–198.Google Scholar
${Q}_p$
et R. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 106 (1989), no. 1, pp. 193–198.Google Scholar $p$
-adics
. Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 62 (1997), no. 4, pp. 1075–1092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
$p$
-adics
. Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 62 (1997), no. 4, pp. 1075–1092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar ${C}^{\infty }$
-functions
. Annales de la Faculté des Sciences de Toulouse: Mathématiques (6), vol. 19 (2010), nos. 3–4, pp. 479–492.Google Scholar
${C}^{\infty }$
-functions
. Annales de la Faculté des Sciences de Toulouse: Mathématiques (6), vol. 19 (2010), nos. 3–4, pp. 479–492.Google Scholar $\boldsymbol{p}$
-Adic Fields, volume 1050 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1984.Google Scholar
$\boldsymbol{p}$
-Adic Fields, volume 1050 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1984.Google Scholar $\left(\mathbb{Z};+\right)$
. Notre Dame J. Form. Log., vol. 64 (2023), no. 2, 225–238.Google Scholar
$\left(\mathbb{Z};+\right)$
. Notre Dame J. Form. Log., vol. 64 (2023), no. 2, 225–238.Google Scholar $NIP$
 structure which does not interpret an infinite group but whose shelah expansion interprets an infinite field, preprint, 2019, arXiv:1910.13504.Google Scholar
$NIP$
 structure which does not interpret an infinite group but whose shelah expansion interprets an infinite field, preprint, 2019, arXiv:1910.13504.Google Scholar