Hostname: page-component-76c49bb84f-l6pkv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-03T18:23:51.601Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Regular ultrafilters and finite square principles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Juliette Kennedy ,
Saharon Shelah  and
Jouko Väänänen
Juliette Kennedy
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Utrecht University, Netherlands Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Helsinki, Finland, E-mail: jkennedy@cc.helsinki.fi
Saharon Shelah
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Utrecht University, Netherlands Institute of Mathematics, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel, E-mail: shelah@math.huji.ac.il
Jouko Väänänen
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Utrecht University, Netherlands Institute for Logic, Language and Computation, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands, E-mail: jouko.vaananen@helsinki.fi
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We show that many singular cardinals λ above a strongly compact cardinal have regular ultrafilters D that violate the finite square principle introduced in [3]. For such ultrafilters D and cardinals λ there are models of size λ for which Mλ/D is not λ++-universal and elementarily equivalent models M and N of size λ for which Mλ/D and Nλ/D are non-isomorphic. The question of the existence of such ultrafilters and models was raised in [1].

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Symbolic Logic , Volume 73 , Issue 3 , September 2008 , pp. 817 - 823
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

[1]Chang, C. C. and Keisler, J., Model theory, North-Holland, 1990.Google Scholar
[2]Jensen, R., The fine structure of the constructible hierarchy, Annals of Mathematical Logic, vol. 4 (1972), pp. 229–308, erratum, R. Jensen, The fine structure of the constructible hierarchy, Annals of Mathematical Logic, vol. 4 (1972), p. 443, with a section by Jack Silver.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Kennedy, J. and Sheiah, S., On regular reduced products, this Journal, vol. 67 (2002), no. 3, pp. 1169–1177.Google Scholar
[4]Kennedy, J. and Sheiah, S., More on regular reduced products, this Journal, vol. 69 (2004), no. 4, pp. 1261–1266.Google Scholar
[5]Magidor, M. and Shelah, S., The tree property at successors of singular cardinals, Archive for Mathematical Logic, vol. 35 (1996), no. 5-6, pp. 385–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Shelah, S., “Gap 1” two-cardinal principles and the omitting types theorem for L(Q), Israel Journal of Mathematics, vol. 65 (1989), no. 2, pp. 133–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar